Dallas Buyers Club action - speculative

Dallas Buyers Club action - speculative

Author
Discussion

Pommygranite

Original Poster:

14,327 posts

223 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
So what are the chances of anyone actually getting sued? Surely anyone who gets a letter from the lawyer is just going to ignore it?

Not involved myself but reckon a few people I know will be getting letters.


Bibbs

3,733 posts

217 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
I got a letter about an episode of Dexter a while back (missed the series link on FoxTel), nothing seemed to come of it.

Can see there being quite a few people being caught.

Time to swap to TOR?

Lambchopski

469 posts

194 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
I can't help but feel a bit worried now :'(

Is the best option just to use a VPN?

Pommygranite

Original Poster:

14,327 posts

223 months

Tuesday 7th April 2015
quotequote all
Bibbs - what did the letter say you received, who from and what did it threaten? Interested to know what these look like.

Apparently the company who supplied the search bot thing stated in an interview with CNET that they ran their search from April to May 2014 so if you downloaded either side then I would think its outside of this action.

Also, the bush lawyer sentiments seem to be that Australia Consumer Law stops frivolous damages so most some people will be up for is the cost of the DVD and the lawyer charges - so perhaps a few $ hundred at a guess.

In addition DBC cant release the identity of who they think is downloading so by protecting the privacy i'm guessing they cant accuse an individual and if so can they therefore pursue action? I dont know.

What is known as this is going to be a given moving forward (being tracked).

For $4-7 a month a VPN is surely De-rigeur now. Stops adverts and avoids geoblocks so a few benefits.

Bibbs

3,733 posts

217 months

Wednesday 8th April 2015
quotequote all
I've just had a look, and I must have deleted it.

It basically said that I was sharing a file which had a copyright claim (it gave me the file name).

"Please stop, or they'll investigate further."

It was a full season of Dexter (I couldn't find the episode on it's own), was a fairly 'new' release, and I'd been away for a week or two and it was just sharing in the background.

I'll have another look later.

Lambchopski

469 posts

194 months

Wednesday 8th April 2015
quotequote all
From the article I jut read, it's the IP addresses of the seeders that have been handed over. Mine is only seeding while downloading and at a miserable 10k LOL

200bhp

5,681 posts

226 months

Sunday 12th April 2015
quotequote all
I've just signed up with Torguard as a result of this. Obviously I dont ever download anything illegal, it's only for the old out-of-copyright films I'm so fond of wink After lots of research it seems to be one of the better options and a minimal cost per month.

If these letters are based only on the IP address, how can they prove your neighbour hasnt been using your unsecured wireless network to download illegal content? I'm guessing that as a civil matter they have no right to inspect your hard drive so "my wifi has no password" would be a reasonable comeback?