2500 engine problems / sought

2500 engine problems / sought

Author
Discussion

Warwick67

Original Poster:

418 posts

221 months

Thursday 16th February 2012
quotequote all
I've got my Triumph 2.5 in bits, from a TVR 2500 M. Just been told by the engineering firm that the crank shaft is too far gone, also needs a re-bore and the head needs rebuilding. So, I find myself wondering has anyone out there got an engine for sale? It's not running the original engine, its an MM so should be that someone has dropped a 2500 saloon engine in there....

Cheers.
Warwick

Stedman

7,286 posts

199 months

Thursday 16th February 2012
quotequote all
Can't help you but i'd love to see pictures!

My dad has got a 2500 mk1 p.i automatic saloon.....I think it's a 1968...?

Warwick67

Original Poster:

418 posts

221 months

Thursday 16th February 2012
quotequote all
Stedman

Some pics of the car at the link below... hope it works

http://s871.photobucket.com/albums/ab275/wjgsports...

Cheers
Warwick

Warwick67

Original Poster:

418 posts

221 months

Friday 17th February 2012
quotequote all
Now I'm getting into it, another question: whats the difference between a long back and a short back crank shaft - obviously the length of the back...laugh But are they interchangeable? Why are there 2 standards?

Cheers

garagewidow

1,502 posts

177 months

Saturday 18th February 2012
quotequote all
don't quote me on it but i think the later 2500 engines had the long back crank with corresponding f/wheel,probably for extra refinement and maybe auto g/boxes.you have to use the correct f/wheel with the appropriate crank otherwise there will be clutch issues.for a bit more pep a shortback with a moderatly lightened gt6 fly wheel is ok unless you want to weigh out on a steel billet or ally oneeek

VitesseEFI

11 posts

187 months

Saturday 17th March 2012
quotequote all
May be a bit late now but:

The long back crank was used in TR5, possibly earlier TR6s and Mk1 2.5 PI. The tail of the crank, where the flywheel bolts on, is 1/2" longer than the short back crank.

Purpose was to allow a thinner, (lighter) flywheel and still place the friction surface in the same place as the thicker, heavier flywheel.

Bottom line is that you can use either, provided you use the correct matching flywheel.

I feel your pain as I also have a garage full of 2.5 engines (well 3 of them), all of which are poorly and in need of serious investment. My advice on the second-hand engine front would be don't, unless you can actually drive the donor car first (and not just up and down someones drive either) or it comes with an endorsement from someone you trust, who does know where it came from and how good it is.

Nick

Stevo302

395 posts

145 months

Thursday 27th December 2012
quotequote all
What carbs were on the TVR? Look bigger than standard.

Warwick67

Original Poster:

418 posts

221 months

Thursday 17th January 2013
quotequote all
Adrian,

Sorry I missed this one... now answered oer on the TVR Classics Forum

Cheers