Should TVR scrap some models??

Should TVR scrap some models??

Author
Discussion

flasher

Original Poster:

9,240 posts

299 months

Sunday 13th January 2002
quotequote all
At present TVR has Ten different specs of car...
I think that TVR should scrap building the Chimaera and possibly the Cerbera. This would allow them to concerntrate on the Tamora, Tuscan and Tuscan R.

Maybe this would increase build quality and improve the reputation of the speed-six engines.

My only thought is that the Cerbera should probably be replaced at some point because TVR do need to have 2+2 in their range IMO.

What does everyone else think??

ATG

22,112 posts

287 months

Sunday 13th January 2002
quotequote all
I imagine the Chimaera is approaching the end already, but they'll have to wait until the Tamora's sales are well and truly established. But I can't see them dropping the Cerbera if it is still selling well. Tamora and Chim overlap a lot, so dropping one makes good sense, but why drop the Cerbera?

flasher

Original Poster:

9,240 posts

299 months

Sunday 13th January 2002
quotequote all
I don't really want them to drop the cerbie as I love the Cerbie, I had one!!.
Firstly they probably don't build that many Cerbies and secondly as I said before,they need to have a 2+2 in their range.

The point I'm making is that IMO they have too many different models and derivatives to get their quality control right. Dropping some of them may help that AND at the same time simplify the production line a bit and shorten the waiting times.

Edited by flasher on Sunday 13th January 20:18

Ston

634 posts

284 months

Sunday 13th January 2002
quotequote all
Wasn't 2001 the last year for the Griff?

and did the Chimaera have a facelift lastyear? covers on the headlights etc...

Edited by Ston on Sunday 13th January 20:47

flasher

Original Poster:

9,240 posts

299 months

Sunday 13th January 2002
quotequote all
1. There are still some Griff 100's left.
2. I know they changed the healight cowls of the Chim, but should they scrap it or not??? I think they should.

griffchris

166 posts

285 months

Sunday 13th January 2002
quotequote all
I personally can't see any sense in continuing production of the Chim. It seems to be in direct competition with the Tamora, except I think I'm right in saying the latter is cheaper, a fair bit faster, handles much better and is for the time being more exclusive. I suppose the Chim has got a bigger boot but if you want practicality then don't get a TVR fullstop.
Some may complain the Tamora doesn't have a V8, and its looks are "acquired", but IMO the Chim isn't exactly the looker of the bunch either. (Incoming, take cover!)
Alternatively, as long as customers continue to order and pay for them, maybe TVR should just continue to make them.

McNab

1,627 posts

289 months

Sunday 13th January 2002
quotequote all
flasher, agree with that 100%. Although not a TVR owner, I would shed a big tear if they quit - they're the last of the true Brits (no offense to ultra-low-volume folk), and they defy the PC brigade totally.

Worry about their multi-model policy bringing them down though, and they would have to quit if they overcooked it. Tamora/Tuscan/New Cerb seems a good recipe. Incidentally, why do so many TVR diehards have reservations re Tamora? Surely it will do well.


WalterU

470 posts

292 months

Sunday 13th January 2002
quotequote all
I personally think they should keep the Chim, make a Tuscan 2+2 and scrap the Cerbera.

OR reduce the model palette, i.e. Chim only 500, Cerbera only speed 6, etc. etc.

If only they didn't have the (perceived) speed 6 problems and the general quality problems, TVR could be a world-class player.

I've said it before and say it again. If they came clean with facts and figures on the speed 6 rebuilds (which I am sure are harmless) I think they would be swamped with orders.

That their sales have gone downhill so much are IMHO almost exclusively a result of the speed 6 problems.

I think they should keep the Chim, which has a "classic" feel and look to it, which many prefer to the Tamora.

Rgds, WalterU

Edited by WalterU on Sunday 13th January 21:40

steveab

1,143 posts

292 months

Sunday 13th January 2002
quotequote all
As a Chim owner I would be sad to see production end. But at the end of the day Flashers right, too many models.

I think the Rover V8 would be missed rather than the actual car (Griff and Chim).

However, I would be totally supportive if TVR utilized the AJP8 in a new model.

Personnally, I hope they drop the Cerbera SS and just keep the AJP8 versions. Leave the SS to the Tuscan and Tamora.

I guess the fact that the AJP8 is only in the Cerbera means that TVR are probably scrapping that V8 also.

christof

930 posts

299 months

Sunday 13th January 2002
quotequote all
Believe me fellow TVRiders, the AJP8 especially with the RedRose Spec is the best engine TVR ever made and its also the best V8 I've ever driven, incl. Ferraris V8. Pleeeease MR. Wheeler we want more TVRs with the AJP8 in it !!!!

EdT

5,175 posts

299 months

Monday 14th January 2002
quotequote all
quote:

Believe me fellow TVRiders, the AJP8 especially with the RedRose Spec is the best engine TVR ever



..and he should know!
Ed

flasher

Original Poster:

9,240 posts

299 months

Monday 14th January 2002
quotequote all
I'm with you there Christof.

I always wanted a Griff with an AJP 8 engine. I think that should have gone in the Tuscan and the S6 should have never been built.But it's here to stay.
My main point here is that TVR most successful period was when they just had the Chimaera and Griffith. Anyone who has been to Blackpool can see why.

I would go with this:-

TVR Cerbera 4.5 red rose
TVR Tuscan S
TVR Tuscan R
TVR Tamora

At the moment they have :-

Chimaera 450
Chimaera 500
Griffith 500 (only a couple left)
Tamora
Cerbera 4.2
Cerbera S6
Cerbera 4.5
Tuscan
Tuscan S
Tuscan R

It's too much for such a small company.



jamesc

2,820 posts

299 months

Monday 14th January 2002
quotequote all
I don't think the cars should be dropped; however I do believe the TVR engines should go and I would replace them with either BMW, Jaguar, Rover or Ford units. The TVR engines were developed on budget and are not as refined as mainstream units.

flasher

Original Poster:

9,240 posts

299 months

Monday 14th January 2002
quotequote all
quote:

The TVR engines were developed on budget and are not as refined as mainstream units.


You can't have owned a TVR then. The day they stick a bloody BMW lump in one is the day I buy something else . If you knew anything about Peter Wheeler you would know this will never happen.

The beauty of TVR is it's engines aren,t "refined" It's like driving a racing car. That's the whole point... The cars are totally different and individual and absolutely nothing like anything else on the road. Long may it continue . I say cut the range and the quality of the cars AND the engines will improve.

Edited by flasher on Monday 14th January 06:40

jamesc

2,820 posts

299 months

Monday 14th January 2002
quotequote all
I owned an AJP8 engined Tuscan race car, the car now owned by Grant of Thames Valley fame. I have also owned S3 (Ford) and Griffith (Rover).

James

flasher

Original Poster:

9,240 posts

299 months

Monday 14th January 2002
quotequote all
OK mate sorry!!! However, if you want a refined engine you buy a Porsche or something really, not a TVR.

I personally wouldn't be interested in a TVR with a Ford/Bmw engine... It wouldn't make the hoise I like so much..

RobM

392 posts

299 months

Monday 14th January 2002
quotequote all
quote:

You can't have owned a TVR then. The day they stick a bloody BMW lump in one is the day I buy something else . If you knew anything about Peter Wheeler you would know this will never happen.



They did it with the rover lump, so I dont see why they cant employ the same strategy again. It'd not put me off in the slightest, infact the chance of (potentialy) cheaper servicing & reliability issues seems like an decent incentive to me.

jazz

65 posts

287 months

Monday 14th January 2002
quotequote all
How about the Bridgend built Jaguar V8?

Jazz

Terminator

2,421 posts

299 months

Monday 14th January 2002
quotequote all
quote:

I personally wouldn't be interested in a TVR with a Ford/Bmw engine... It wouldn't make the hoise I like so much..



You obviously never heard my 4.7 litre Ford-engined Tuscan V8 (1970 vintage) at Brands at the 1997 Golden Jubilee weekend

DIGGA

43,453 posts

298 months

Monday 14th January 2002
quotequote all
They'll eventually need to phase the Rover V8 out, so that means they should scrap the Chim.

The Tamora with the 'cooking' Speed 6 is a good enrty level. With the Tuscan and Tuscan S following on, in a fairly logical way. The 6 is a lovely engine (provided it's functioning), and must surely be sorted by now?

The Cerbera 6, 4.2 & 4.5 also fit well and serve a purpose in the range, though perhaps a minor styling re-work wouldn't hurt. The AJP V8 should be kept since, as already pointed out, it is one of the most exciting road car engines ever.

This leaves the confusion at the top of the range - i.e. Tuscan R (2+2), and the Cerbera Speed 12. There's no doubt a flagship, TVR supercar in there somewhere, but I'm bu66ered if I can understand how or what is going on there.

Marcus
& Ocean Haze Griff 500