TVRs avoided by thieves
TVRs avoided by thieves
Author
Discussion

simon@63

Original Poster:

148 posts

285 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
http://money.msn.co.uk/insurance/Insight/Journals/Ta

Cars thieves avoid

Ford Ka post-1998
Nissan Micra post-1998
Honda Civic CRX pre-1991
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
Toyota Yaris
Citroen Xsara 1995-2003
Peugeot 307 post-2001
Subaru Legacy post-2001
VW Passat
Renault Clio
Volvo S40/V40
Audi Coupé 2001-2003
Mercedes 500 2001-2003
Skoda Superb
Subaru Legacy post-2001
BMW Z4
Jaguar XK8
Lotus Elan/Elite
TVR
Skoda Superb
Rolls Royce


So as most cars only do 2k a year and no-one steals them, why are they so expensive to insure???


mrmaggit

10,146 posts

277 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
Because they suffer highly from single vehicle crashes, especially in the first year of ownership. And even a minor bump is expensive to repair.

Don

28,378 posts

313 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
mrmaggit said:
Because they suffer highly from single vehicle crashes


Sadly. Although they are not alone in this. Ferraris, Porsches, etc have the same problem. Its been said before - having the money to pay for one is no indication as to the ability to drive it.

The upside is that if you make a few years of ownership incident free then the "good" insurance companies do appear to take this into account. Insuring the stable has got a good deal cheaper over the years...

alloypearltam

9,586 posts

272 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
I have always thought our TVR wasn't to bad on insurance. We paid far more money for our M3 and Boxster, plus those cars had to have trackers, even though they cost less than the Tamora.

thearb

446 posts

276 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
I lived in Fulham for seven years, kept a Griffith on the street. In all that time every other single porsche and beemer got either keyed or roof slashed.

Griffith wasn't touched once. The only trouble I had was when I went to the States for 2 weeks in February and I came back to find it had filled with water as it had rained incessantly while I was away.

cheeky

2,104 posts

293 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
Don said:
mrmaggit said:
Because they suffer highly from single vehicle crashes


Sadly. Although they are not alone in this. Ferraris, Porsches, etc have the same problem. Its been said before - having the money to pay for one is no indication as to the ability to drive it.

The upside is that if you make a few years of ownership incident free then the "good" insurance companies do appear to take this into account. Insuring the stable has got a good deal cheaper over the years...


My insurance has never gone down despite now being 17 years free of bangs and claims and 4 of those in a Tuscan (+2 in an M3)! V. annoying.

grahamw48

9,944 posts

267 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
thearb said:
I lived in Fulham for seven years, kept a Griffith on the street. In all that time every other single porsche and beemer got either keyed or roof slashed.

Griffith wasn't touched once. The only trouble I had was when I went to the States for 2 weeks in February and I came back to find it had filled with water as it had rained incessantly while I was away.


That's RESPECT.

cirks

2,544 posts

312 months

Thursday 12th January 2006
quotequote all
I see the Subaru Legacy post-2001 is ignored twice by thieves according to that list

tallbloke

10,376 posts

312 months

Friday 13th January 2006
quotequote all
thearb said:
I lived in Fulham for seven years, kept a Griffith on the street. In all that time every other single porsche and beemer got either keyed or roof slashed.

Griffith wasn't touched once.


And you never got caught?

tallbloke

10,376 posts

312 months

Friday 13th January 2006
quotequote all
cirks said:
I see the Subaru Legacy post-2001 is ignored twice by thieves according to that list

A mate of mine has just had one imported from Japan. Twin sequential turbo.

rev-erend

21,619 posts

313 months

Friday 13th January 2006
quotequote all
I've never found TVR's expensive to insure..

450 SEAC 5K mile <£300
T350C unlimited miles £700

To put this in perspective - 17 year old in a 1.4 gold £1500 TPTF..

Yes I know about age difference blah blah .. but I still think TVR's are not peanalised my Focus ST170 (previous car) was £550..

A £150 jump for a T350 is no heavy preminum.

TheArb

446 posts

276 months

Friday 13th January 2006
quotequote all
tallbloke said:
thearb said:
I lived in Fulham for seven years, kept a Griffith on the street. In all that time every other single porsche and beemer got either keyed or roof slashed.

Griffith wasn't touched once.


And you never got caught?


you would have thought they'd have worked it out eventually wouldn't you?

grahamw48

9,944 posts

267 months

Saturday 14th January 2006
quotequote all
rev-erend said:
I've never found TVR's expensive to insure..

450 SEAC 5K mile <£300
T350C unlimited miles £700

To put this in perspective - 17 year old in a 1.4 gold £1500 TPTF..

Yes I know about age difference blah blah .. but I still think TVR's are not peanalised my Focus ST170 (previous car) was £550..

A £150 jump for a T350 is no heavy preminum.


Yes, but it's naughty of you to describe it to Saga Ins. as an 'Invalid Carriage'.

rev-erend

21,619 posts

313 months

Sunday 15th January 2006
quotequote all
grahamw48 said:
rev-erend said:
I've never found TVR's expensive to insure..

450 SEAC 5K mile <£300
T350C unlimited miles £700

To put this in perspective - 17 year old in a 1.4 gold £1500 TPTF..

Yes I know about age difference blah blah .. but I still think TVR's are not peanalised my Focus ST170 (previous car) was £550..

A £150 jump for a T350 is no heavy preminum.


Yes, but it's naughty of you to describe it to Saga Ins. as an 'Invalid Carriage'.


I'm way too young for Saga

carl_w

10,741 posts

287 months

Monday 16th January 2006
quotequote all
What's a "Mercedes 500"? Which class of "500"?
Equally, what's an "Audi Coupe 2001-2003"? Do they mean a TT?