The Misery Continues - A322 Speed Limit Proposal
The Misery Continues - A322 Speed Limit Proposal
Author
Discussion

Mr Tidy

Original Poster:

27,166 posts

143 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
I got a link on the BBC News Homepage today saying that a 60mph limit is being considered for the dual-carriageway section South of the M3 - basically the Lightwater by-pass - to reduce accidents.

I'm not aware of there being any accidents, but based on recent experience of these proposals it's just a matter of time. banghead

I suppose the only good news is it's 60, not 50!

Big_Dog

991 posts

201 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
The only accident I remember from my 10 years living in Lightwater was the junction of the A322 with the Guildford Road. A chap on a motorbike died. They fixed the visibility problem some 5 years ago. Nothing since.

Tymb

194 posts

111 months

Tuesday
quotequote all
I’d gladly swap a lower speed limit (no matter how pointless) if they actually sorted the traffic management out on junction 3 so you could get off it. Even when the traffic is light the queue is ridiculous, coming from the Bisley direction I normally end up cutting across to Mychett and going up the A331 to the M3.

bigdom

2,211 posts

161 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Mr Tidy said:
I got a link on the BBC News Homepage today saying that a 60mph limit is being considered for the dual-carriageway section South of the M3 - basically the Lightwater by-pass - to reduce accidents.

I'm not aware of there being any accidents, but based on recent experience of these proposals it's just a matter of time. banghead

I suppose the only good news is it's 60, not 50!
I'm not sure it would have helped in this one, but i'm sure it's in their numbers: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/crgmg4883r7o

Or this one, an early hours crash: https://www.getreading.co.uk/news/reading-berkshir...

I'm aware speed makes up 29% of fatal crahes, but 50% of them are on 30mph! At this rate, we will go back to having someone waving a red flag.

TheRainMaker

7,091 posts

258 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
Again, zero information in the statement-of-reasons.

It highlights four fatalities in the last 10 years, but two are covered above and have nothing to do with the speed limit banghead


Mr Tidy

Original Poster:

27,166 posts

143 months

Wednesday
quotequote all
That seems about par for the course.

No proper reason given backed by facts, they just want to reduce limits everywhere. They may have a consultation, but regardless of the responses they'll just impose it anyway. redface

edc

9,437 posts

267 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Tymb said:
I’d gladly swap a lower speed limit (no matter how pointless) if they actually sorted the traffic management out on junction 3 so you could get off it. Even when the traffic is light the queue is ridiculous, coming from the Bisley direction I normally end up cutting across to Mychett and going up the A331 to the M3.
If you are coming via Bisley the best shortcut is via Light water to Windlesham and gets you the other side of the roundabout.

Mr Tidy

Original Poster:

27,166 posts

143 months

Thursday
quotequote all
edc said:
Tymb said:
I’d gladly swap a lower speed limit (no matter how pointless) if they actually sorted the traffic management out on junction 3 so you could get off it. Even when the traffic is light the queue is ridiculous, coming from the Bisley direction I normally end up cutting across to Mychett and going up the A331 to the M3.
If you are coming via Bisley the best shortcut is via Light water to Windlesham and gets you the other side of the roundabout.
Why did you have to mention that? Now the queues in New Road, Windlesham will just get longer. frown

Curlyvizsla

14 posts

32 months

Thursday
quotequote all
Surrey County Council issued a County wide policy document for consultation on speed limits around 18 months ago. The bottom line was the intention to reduce speed limits by 10MPH from existing limits on all roads in Surrey to reduce pollution. Very few people responded …perhaps because few knew about it…. It was not well publicised. The document focused on pollution, and road safety rather than speed. . The Policy now appears to be being implemented across the whole County. If it hasn't happened on a road near you it may well be coming. Your description of events is very similar to the reduction in Speed limit on a section of the A217 known as the ‘Mad Mile’ near Banstead, which gradually dropped from National Speed limit down to 60 and now to 40MPH. From memory the proposal was also to include 20mph ( rather than 30mph ) through some villages.

Terminator X

17,928 posts

220 months

Yesterday (01:14)
quotequote all
Seems silly but a great excuse to use for eco reasons I guess. No doubt the massive queues at rush hour on the M3 roundabout give no pollution at all.

TX.

Bathroom_Security

3,607 posts

133 months

Yesterday (10:43)
quotequote all
Tymb said:
I’d gladly swap a lower speed limit (no matter how pointless) if they actually sorted the traffic management out on junction 3 so you could get off it. Even when the traffic is light the queue is ridiculous, coming from the Bisley direction I normally end up cutting across to Mychett and going up the A331 to the M3.
I remember queuing for hours trying to join the M3 there once, I'd only just moved to Surrey at the time and decided to go back up north to see family. Nightmare.

I live elsewhere in Surrey and rarely go down the bypass now but its pretty disheartening to see another road face reduced limits. During quiet times it was a nice stretch of clear road to open the car up to the 70mph limit and definately not exceed it without causing anyone any harm.

Ive seen a couple of crashes over the years where absolute morons had somehow managed to lose control on the straight sections of road and crash into the trees (how?!), plus people hoon up that road like its the autobahn, I bet you some people travel at over 150mph on that road.

Hate living in this county at times I really do, just want to get out on an evening and enjoy driving a little and blow the depression out the window without being penalised by these s all the time, are they bored? There must be some anti motoring Karens in control here determined to reduce speed limits across the entire county to 20mph. fking miserable s.



Mr Tidy

Original Poster:

27,166 posts

143 months

Yesterday (20:22)
quotequote all
Curlyvizsla said:
Surrey County Council issued a County wide policy document for consultation on speed limits around 18 months ago. The bottom line was the intention to reduce speed limits by 10MPH from existing limits on all roads in Surrey to reduce pollution. Very few people responded …perhaps because few knew about it…. It was not well publicised. The document focused on pollution, and road safety rather than speed. . The Policy now appears to be being implemented across the whole County. If it hasn't happened on a road near you it may well be coming. Your description of events is very similar to the reduction in Speed limit on a section of the A217 known as the ‘Mad Mile’ near Banstead, which gradually dropped from National Speed limit down to 60 and now to 40MPH. From memory the proposal was also to include 20mph ( rather than 30mph ) through some villages.
Yes I remember that fiasco. More than 50% of respondents to the consultation wanted to keep the 60 limit but Surrey CC ignored them and reduced it to 40 anyway. Because the sanctimonious tts think they know better than the people who elected them. banghead

Not far off the A217 Cheam village did get a stretch of 20 mph a couple of years ago, but it's part of a London Borough.