Pirbright Bends

Author
Discussion

ARHarh

4,716 posts

122 months

Thursday 27th July 2023
quotequote all
COLONEL_SMITH said:
Its been a while since the cameras went live but a few of us at work who use that road are starting to question if they are actually working. I am often caught up quickly despite being bang on 40mph and have even seen overtakes. Has anyone had a ticket from these cameras?
Its not really making it safer as cars are still driving into the trees
You are probably up against the average person not understanding average smile And the great belief that is is fine to drive at the limit +10% +2mph (46 mph).

People have been crashing into trees there since cars were invented that is never going to change. I remember as a kid in the 60's seeing a ford Anglia wedged a foot off the ground between to 2 trees.

Dan_The_Man

1,124 posts

254 months

Monday 31st July 2023
quotequote all
There were police in the trees at the Pirbright end of Cemetery Pales doing speed checks on Friday !

bigothunter

12,493 posts

75 months

Monday 31st July 2023
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Speed cameras are intended to reduce speed not accidents.

So logically they should be placed at the least hazardous locations where motorists are most likely to exceed speed limits. Even more effective when speed limits are inappropriately low.

bigothunter

12,493 posts

75 months

Monday 31st July 2023
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Only if their purpose is to reduce accidents, injuries and deaths. At best, that's only a partial objective.

Speed cameras are intended to reduce speed not accidents. This has already been explained by an ex-police contributor.

Mr Tidy

26,769 posts

142 months

Monday 31st July 2023
quotequote all
And there I was thinking the primary purpose was to generate revenue. laugh

bigothunter

12,493 posts

75 months

Tuesday 1st August 2023
quotequote all
Interpret at will.

Ex police officer said:
Ver batim:

If your job is to enforce the speed limit there's little point having a camera van where few people are speeding because topography already limits the possibility to.

Better placed to enforce where lots are speeding.

_____________________________

It's about enforcing compliance.

The revenue stream is not within the power of the enforcers, it lays with drivers as they are supposedly in control of the vehicle they are driving & it's speed (or they are demonstrating a lack of the required control in it).

You don't speed, you don't pay.

Frimley111R

17,035 posts

249 months

Friday 11th August 2023
quotequote all
I used to go to Pirbright reasonably often, to the pubs there or as a nice shortcut to Guildford. I haven't been since they put in the cameras and probably won't ever go that way again unless I really have to.

Mr Tidy

26,769 posts

142 months

Friday 11th August 2023
quotequote all
TBH the speed bumps by the pond put me off going there years ago!