A14 speed cameras?

Author
Discussion

cj_eds

Original Poster:

1,567 posts

228 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2007
quotequote all
Don't know if anyone else heard this last night on the traffic reports. Was pretty sure there was a report saying the roadworks on the A14 involve the installation of average speed cameras between Huntingdon and Cambridge.

Will be interesting to see if it helps the 0->70->0->70->crash rush hour traffic.

simpo two

87,097 posts

272 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2007
quotequote all
Ironically it probably will. There's not much you can do except stare at the speedo (or engage cruise control if you have it). Mind you, 0-70-0-70 averages out at 35 (arguably, as I'm not a mathematician) so that would work too

danger mouse

3,828 posts

268 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2007
quotequote all
You'd be bloody lucky to even get up 70 on that stretch half the time.

Waste of money, they will achieve nothing.

They should invest in a proper third lane so people can actually get to work on time instead of hindering them further.

I don't know any official figures but in the ten years or so since the original GATSO's went up, the road has become a traffic ridden death trap, and the scameras have greatly contributed to the problem rather than knip it in the bud.

Saftey Partnership.... whatever.rolleyes

Wicker Man

824 posts

250 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2007
quotequote all
danger mouse said:
You'd be bloody lucky to even get up 70 on that stretch half the time.

Waste of money, they will achieve nothing.

They should invest in a proper third lane so people can actually get to work on time instead of hindering them further.

yes But a third lane would require our leaders to take a long term view. Don't hold your breath!

simpo two

87,097 posts

272 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2007
quotequote all
Wicker Man said:
yes But a third lane would require our leaders to take a long term view.

It would encourage the use of those nasty car things; far better to make it a single carriageway with humps and bollards!

MTv Dave

2,101 posts

263 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2007
quotequote all
If you did do 0->70->0->70 then you would average a lot less than 35.

I hate the average cameras, like you say, there's not much to do but stare at the speedo and ignore the road, just hoping for the best mad

V8 EOL

2,781 posts

229 months

Tuesday 23rd January 2007
quotequote all
The CHUMMS study has done it to death. Check out this.

The latest plans involve a Huntingdon relief road around Swavesey coming out near Grafton Water.

cj_eds

Original Poster:

1,567 posts

228 months

Wednesday 24th January 2007
quotequote all
V8 EOL said:
The CHUMMS study has done it to death. Check out this.

The latest plans involve a Huntingdon relief road around Swavesey coming out near Grafton Water.


Short term solution (within 5 years): "A14 signing, marking , safety enhancements"


cdp

7,541 posts

261 months

Friday 26th January 2007
quotequote all
danger mouse said:
You'd be bloody lucky to even get up 70 on that stretch half the time.

Waste of money, they will achieve nothing.

They should invest in a proper third lane so people can actually get to work on time instead of hindering them further.

I don't know any official figures but in the ten years or so since the original GATSO's went up, the road has become a traffic ridden death trap, and the scameras have greatly contributed to the problem rather than knip it in the bud.

Saftey Partnership.... whatever.rolleyes


But the other half of the time the camera partnerships are quids in.

What really annoyed me was the in the TV interviews EVERYBODY said it was a good idea. Not one voice against it. Or at least not one broadcast.

simpo two

87,097 posts

272 months

Friday 26th January 2007
quotequote all
cdp said:
What really annoyed me was the in the TV interviews EVERYBODY said it was a good idea. Not one voice against it. Or at least not one broadcast.

Such is the power of the media, unfortunately. However I think people have a remarkable tendency to trot out the 'proper' line on camera, when privately they hate speed cameras as much as the rest of us.

Think of this - let's say you follow a car at 40mph through a 30mph limit. Afterwards, you pull the driver over, point a TV camera at him and say 'Do you think speeding is bad?' and he will say 'Oh yes, definitely'.

BC007

40 posts

231 months

Friday 26th January 2007
quotequote all
Absolutely outrageous. Instead of upgrading the A14 which is desperately needed they waste 2.5 million on a system that will have little effect. The average speed is less than 30 mph at the best of times due to volume of traffic!

Thanks to speed cameras, traffic calming and speed humps it will soon be impossible to enjoy your cars. Make the most of them now.

I consider myself to be a safe, responsible driver so why should I be penalised by the idiots on the road?

Everyone moans about the restrictions being placed on motorists. We are all guilty of sitting back and allowing this crap to be heaped on us. We need to protest in mass before it's too late. There has to be power in numbers.

A thoroughly disillusioned PistonHead!

niva441

2,023 posts

238 months

Friday 26th January 2007
quotequote all
Interestingly the local free papers differ in their opinions. One tows the standard line claimed they are wonderful. The other says they are going to create problems as drivers will be changing lanes to exploit the SPECS flaw.

speedyman

1,560 posts

241 months

Friday 26th January 2007
quotequote all
I moved to this area sixteen years ago, guess what dominated the local papers then, A14 needs widening...
Now wasting more money, The road does not have enough capacity. It needs a third maybe even a fourth lane.

Why does it take so long to get the bleeding obvious done in this country ???

Speedyman furious

simpo two

87,097 posts

272 months

Friday 26th January 2007
quotequote all
speedyman said:
Why does it take so long to get the bleeding obvious done in this country ???

A decision that's politically correct is, by definition, a wrong decision. They won't build extra lanes because they think it will encourage the use of nasty cars (and the greenies, who don't use cars, will scream blue murder), and the underlying purpose of limits, humps, cameras etc is to make driving as unpleasant and expensive as possible.

The more cynical I get, the more cynical I find I need to be. There are some very clever and devious people pulling the strings in this country. Dig down far enough, and the agenda is easy to spot. What bugs me is that they keep covering it up with fake agendas which patently don't hold water.

BC007

40 posts

231 months

Friday 26th January 2007
quotequote all
What annoys me the most is that the people who moan will go out and put a cross on the ballot paper at the next election without thinking about the consequences. It doesn't matter who's in power - they're all going to hammer the motorist. Will they listen to the public? Like hell they will. It's time people took a long hard look at the way they are represented. Remember the fuel blockade? If it was pushed just that bit further it would have been castastrophic for the government. People need to stand up and be counted.

Howitzer

2,857 posts

223 months

Saturday 27th January 2007
quotequote all
The A14 is a perfectly fine road imo.

The problem is that every 10 seconds a lorry decides to overtake another lorry going up a slight incline around the outside of a curve.

Dave!

BC007

40 posts

231 months

Monday 29th January 2007
quotequote all
I regularly commute from Peterborough to Cambridge in the mornings. Almost every day there is either a broken down vehicle, an accident or congestion. The bottom line is there's too much traffic and not enough carriageway.

It is 11.05 on Monday 29th January 2007 and I have just arrived at work. I left Perterborough at 08.30. Over 2.5 hours to cover 40 miles. Reason for the delay? - you've guessed it - another accident at Spittals interchange.

Surprised no-one has set up some comfy sofa's and tv's on the roadside for us to enjoy while we wait.

V8 EOL

2,781 posts

229 months

Monday 29th January 2007
quotequote all
BC007 said:
I regularly commute from Peterborough to Cambridge in the mornings. Almost every day there is either a broken down vehicle, an accident or congestion. The bottom line is there's too much traffic and not enough carriageway.
Agreed.

BC007 said:
It is 11.05 on Monday 29th January 2007 and I have just arrived at work. I left Perterborough at 08.30. Over 2.5 hours to cover 40 miles. Reason for the delay? - you've guessed it - another accident at Spittals interchange.

I agree the road is sh1t. It is no surprise to me that it has taken so long on a Monday morning to get into Cambridge. I cant tell from your post if you are just resigned to the fact or surprised it took so long...? anyway...

Why not use a different route? Peterborough > Whittlesley > Benwick > Chatteris > Haddenham > 20 pence road > Cambridge looks like a good bet... I bet it will take you about an hour and much more fun to boot.

BC007

40 posts

231 months

Monday 29th January 2007
quotequote all
Thanks V8 EOL,

I am looking at alternative routes. I will give that one a try.

simpo two

87,097 posts

272 months

Monday 29th January 2007
quotequote all
You could always follow the example set by the Scottish Environmnt Minister - catch a plane and bill the taxpayer...?