Suffolk murders cost £5,000,000

Suffolk murders cost £5,000,000

Author
Discussion

Racingdude009

Original Poster:

5,303 posts

254 months

Wednesday 3rd January 2007
quotequote all
Just seen a piece on BBC Look East saying that the Suffolk Murders cost the force £5m

eccles

13,813 posts

229 months

Wednesday 3rd January 2007
quotequote all
that doesn't suprise me in the slightest.

you don't expect all those extra coppers from other forces to come for free...then they all have to stay somwhere, at suffolk plods cost.....then you add the exta hours all the coppers were doing in overtime....then add on all the civilian staff shipped in....then the forensics bill...etc. etc.

it all adds up.

simpo two

87,090 posts

272 months

Wednesday 3rd January 2007
quotequote all
And then they'll put the culprit in prison for 20+ years which probably costs the taxpayer another £30K a year... another £600K, index linked...

RReflections

39 posts

215 months

Wednesday 3rd January 2007
quotequote all
Better to spend £5+m than to let him roam the streets killing women

V8 EOL

2,781 posts

229 months

Wednesday 3rd January 2007
quotequote all
Ian Huntley cost my local force (Cambridgeshire) millions and millions. Imagine the top quality service we are getting now as a result.

IT10

602 posts

222 months

Wednesday 3rd January 2007
quotequote all
There was something in the Times the other day saying the anti-terrorist search of the woods in High Wycombe after the fun in the summer (which ended just before xmas ) cost about £10 million.

yikes
Craziness

simpo two

87,090 posts

272 months

Thursday 4th January 2007
quotequote all
RReflections said:
Better to spend £5+m than to let him roam the streets killing women

That wasn't the idea; I'm just thinking that surely there must be a cheaper way to deal with these things. The police must be very grateful to him as they've got big bonuses out of it.

Wicker Man

824 posts

250 months

Thursday 4th January 2007
quotequote all
I know a policeman who refers to his house extension as the Scargill Extension as it was paid for by all the overtime he got.

I expect these *murders will cost us taxpayers a lot more yet. There is the trial and the associated lawyer feeding frenzy. Then the appeal and possible compensation for the miscarriage of justice. The public enquiry and finally compensation for the stress and 'trauma' suffered by the police officers doing their jobs.

Bring back the dark ages! A quick breaking on the wheel and everybody was happy.

*Oops, nearly forgot to use the word prostitute.

crankedup

25,764 posts

250 months

Thursday 4th January 2007
quotequote all
I thought that central Goverment coughed up some cash to help meet 'one off' extra costs such as this?

eccles

13,813 posts

229 months

Thursday 4th January 2007
quotequote all
going from reports of previous big investigations, i seem to recall the force has to go cap in hand and ask for extra funding.

simpo two

87,090 posts

272 months

Thursday 4th January 2007
quotequote all
crankedup said:
I thought that central Goverment coughed up some cash to help meet 'one off' extra costs such as this?

'Central Government' gets its money from the same place - you and me.

Tris.E

78 posts

219 months

Friday 5th January 2007
quotequote all
simpo two said:
And then they'll put the culprit in prison for 20+ years which probably costs the taxpayer another £30K a year... another £600K, index linked...

Shame a shotgun cartridge only cost 50p and it would cost at max £1000 to get rid of the body why should we keep killers alive they dont deserve it.
Am i the only one that thinks this way?

crankedup

25,764 posts

250 months

Friday 5th January 2007
quotequote all
Tris.E said:
simpo two said:
And then they'll put the culprit in prison for 20+ years which probably costs the taxpayer another £30K a year... another £600K, index linked...

Shame a shotgun cartridge only cost 50p and it would cost at max £1000 to get rid of the body why should we keep killers alive they dont deserve it.
Am i the only one that thinks this way?


The big fear was that the wrong person may have hanged, but with DNA evidence now so strong this argument may be null and void.

V8 EOL

2,781 posts

229 months

Friday 5th January 2007
quotequote all
Los Angeles said:
crankedup said:
The big fear was that the wrong person may have hanged, but with DNA evidence now so strong this argument may be null and void.
Hi, Crankedup - hope you're well.

I agree in part with your statement, but in many states in the USA DNA tests are conducted by private companies. In one State it was discovered rogue staff regularly caused specimens to be adulterated and spoiled yet still drew conclusions, made their report to law officers, and named names ... in order to protect the reputation of their company and keep the fees rolling in.
Agreed...

A recent documentary programme I watched debunked fingerprint evidence and there are recent examples of cases being thrown out in spite of ‘cast iron’ prints. It is no longer enough to rely on that evidence alone.

I wonder how long it will take for DNA to be found to have the same types of flaws… (human error)

V8 EOL

2,781 posts

229 months

Friday 5th January 2007
quotequote all
I forgot to say... anyone who thinks people should be hanged should watched a inspired film called In the name of the father. Simply brilliant.

simpo two

87,090 posts

272 months

Friday 5th January 2007
quotequote all
Tris.E said:
Shame a shotgun cartridge only cost 50p and it would cost at max £1000 to get rid of the body why should we keep killers alive they dont deserve it.

Save £1,000.50; chuck 'em in the sea evil