AJP V8 into a S?
Discussion
clive f said:
not sure if a v8s chassis would be up to coping with up to 450 bhp, a v6 s definately not, I`m pretty sure the race car version was only an s body on a shortened cerb chassis.
Pretty sure you're right. Derek brought it to SCH at Newark, I'm sure someone will have pictures.Dave_M said:
clive f said:
not sure if a v8s chassis would be up to coping with up to 450 bhp, a v6 s definately not, I`m pretty sure the race car version was only an s body on a shortened cerb chassis.
Pretty sure you're right. Derek brought it to SCH at Newark, I'm sure someone will have pictures.
I`d me gob smacked if anyone has done a full stess analysis on an S chassis to determine the maximum loads which could be applied. I would agee that at some point some compenets wold have to be reinforced, aswell as spring rates and damping.
My car has a dyno`d 240hp and does not show any signs of being over stressed, despite numerous trackdays over the last 4 years witht he current engine.
I also thought that one contributor had supercharged a V8 and had 390hp or so on the dyno?...would be a far more cost effective solution.
I will agree however that these cars are not suitable for anything other than drag racing with bigger power outputs, unless you are willing to spend a lot of time and money developing the suspension etc to cope properly.
My car has a dyno`d 240hp and does not show any signs of being over stressed, despite numerous trackdays over the last 4 years witht he current engine.
I also thought that one contributor had supercharged a V8 and had 390hp or so on the dyno?...would be a far more cost effective solution.
I will agree however that these cars are not suitable for anything other than drag racing with bigger power outputs, unless you are willing to spend a lot of time and money developing the suspension etc to cope properly.
CTE said:
I`d me gob smacked if anyone has done a full stess analysis on an S chassis to determine the maximum loads which could be applied. I would agee that at some point some compenets wold have to be reinforced, aswell as spring rates and damping.
My car has a dyno`d 240hp and does not show any signs of being over stressed, despite numerous trackdays over the last 4 years witht he current engine.
I also thought that one contributor had supercharged a V8 and had 390hp or so on the dyno?...would be a far more cost effective solution.
I will agree however that these cars are not suitable for anything other than drag racing with bigger power outputs, unless you are willing to spend a lot of time and money developing the suspension etc to cope properly.
Not sure about others but I was referring more to the suspension, I know the semi trailing arm isn't going to be as suitable for that kind of power as the rear end of the Cerb. I'm not sure about stress testing and I don't know anywhere enough about the engineering involved in the chassis but I think from memory the chassis in the Cerb had more strengthening compared to the S, I'm sure the S chassis wouldn't fall apart with the power but I'd be happier knowing it was over engineered than under.My car has a dyno`d 240hp and does not show any signs of being over stressed, despite numerous trackdays over the last 4 years witht he current engine.
I also thought that one contributor had supercharged a V8 and had 390hp or so on the dyno?...would be a far more cost effective solution.
I will agree however that these cars are not suitable for anything other than drag racing with bigger power outputs, unless you are willing to spend a lot of time and money developing the suspension etc to cope properly.
Gassing Station | S Series | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





