Discussion
Seems like there was a thumping great big 4 litre version of "our little 2.9s" used in some American Fords. I imagine extra capacity gained by longer stroke rather than bigger bore ( maybe bit of both ) ? Wouldn't exactly make it a high revving screamer !
Anyone know of one of these finding its way into an S ?
Anyone know of one of these finding its way into an S ?
I think the sump has to be modified, and a few other bits. Plus the hassle in finding one, and may be harder to get bits for. That's why I never followed this route, but don't let that put you off.
I think they are rated at over 200bhp in stock form (well with the S induction and exhaust system) but the torque is fantastic, thus giving a good tuning potential with a cam change and head-work.
I'm sure somebody has made an engine using a 4.0 block with 24v Cosworth heads before.
What you really need is a supercharger
I think they are rated at over 200bhp in stock form (well with the S induction and exhaust system) but the torque is fantastic, thus giving a good tuning potential with a cam change and head-work.
I'm sure somebody has made an engine using a 4.0 block with 24v Cosworth heads before.

What you really need is a supercharger

Bit of info for you, could'nt find anything TVR though.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Cologne_V6_engin...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Cologne_V6_engin...
johnnywgk said:
Bit of info for you, could'nt find anything TVR though.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Cologne_V6_engin...
It lead me to this on Wickihttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Cologne_V6_engin...
"Capacity increases
In 1991 increased capacities for the 2.8 and 2.9 engines (3.5 and 3.7 liters, respectively), were first developed and introduced by D.P. Davies and sold by his company, VeeTech Engineering, in the UK. Two companies still produce large capacity conversions on the 2.8 & 2.9: Power Engineering and Specialised Engines.."
I'm pretty sure the 4.0 V6 is also in the current Ford Mustang.. get an engine and box shipped from the states..
Also there are some pretty good looking SC kits for that engine too.. oops just spent the best part of £10K lol..
I'm going for 24V as it was v cheep.. still need the Mustang gearbox though..
Damian
Also there are some pretty good looking SC kits for that engine too.. oops just spent the best part of £10K lol..
I'm going for 24V as it was v cheep.. still need the Mustang gearbox though..
Damian
hi i went to pick up a petrol tank from a guy in amersham he was building an engine using the 4 litre explorer block and the 24v cosworth heads i saw the flywheel he had made up and seeing his other mint and very detailed tvr,s and his fully equipped workshop i would imagine he completed it this guy is a serious engineer problem is i cant remember his name
The 4.0 does have a slightly wider block so you have to modify the sump and you also have to make sure you get a 4.0 with the right crankshaft as the rear needs to be compatible with your flywheel iirc. It's not a great performer but there are a number of very serious 4.0 24v conversions under way at the moment. They would be very expensive but the individuals doing them have engineering facilities and are doing it for their own pleasure. Forced induction on a 2.9 would probably be a better bet be it 12 or 24 valves.
kenpage said:
hi i went to pick up a petrol tank from a guy in amersham he was building an engine using the 4 litre explorer block and the 24v cosworth heads i saw the flywheel he had made up and seeing his other mint and very detailed tvr,s and his fully equipped workshop i would imagine he completed it this guy is a serious engineer problem is i cant remember his name
Mike Pearsall?Lots of information here:
http://www.fordpower.org.uk/forum/index.php?showto...
It'll get good towards the end.
http://www.fordpower.org.uk/forum/index.php?showto...
It'll get good towards the end.
Gassing Station | S Series | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



? ?