From the dark side
From the dark side
Author
Discussion

chiefyo

Original Poster:

279 posts

194 months

Sunday 24th March 2013
quotequote all
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/1996-TVR-CHIMAERA-BLUE-/...

Check out the wording in the listing lol !!!!

mikel003003

1,084 posts

195 months

Sunday 24th March 2013
quotequote all
Is that an 'in' joke ? either way I laughed out load . Nice car mind, I like the speed six front.

Alan Whitaker

2,054 posts

211 months

Sunday 24th March 2013
quotequote all
Hi All,
How do you think Speed 6 lights would look on a S ???

Alan

phillpot

17,509 posts

212 months

Sunday 24th March 2013
quotequote all
Alan Whitaker said:
Hi All,
How do you think Speed 6 lights would look on a S ???

Alan
Dreadful !

totally out of keeping with the almost "retro" look of the car, wouldn't match the rear lights or front indicators so only way would be change everything and while tou're at it loose the rubber bumper strips and .......... (imho) wink

mycroft

1,545 posts

276 months

Sunday 24th March 2013
quotequote all
Must be missing something all looks ok to me .

Speed six lights ? Six cars with a speed six engine but many not with lights like that , Chim just looks wrong to me S would to .

TurboTony

908 posts

200 months

Sunday 24th March 2013
quotequote all
Proof at last!

Ragtop

592 posts

230 months

Sunday 24th March 2013
quotequote all
Alan Whitaker said:
Hi All,
How do you think Speed 6 lights would look on a S ???

Alan
Something like this..?



Not quite as bad as I expected... wink

Graham

Alan Whitaker

2,054 posts

211 months

Sunday 24th March 2013
quotequote all
Hi All
Not bad with the touch up , so here is the real thing.

http://www.carstyleplus.co.uk/TVR_Cerbera/tvr_cerb...

mikel003003

1,084 posts

195 months

Sunday 24th March 2013
quotequote all
I quite like it, I think it would look better with the v8 bonnet, however I don't think the big retro fog lights would work also maybe you would have to have the shotgun style rear lights? Might make it look quite modern ? Or to much of a mish mash ?

AutoAndy

2,270 posts

244 months

Sunday 24th March 2013
quotequote all
!!!! Forget speed six lights on an S. they don't need it.
Yes they help the Chim golf buggies, but that because they look like mgb's, and speaking as a former Triumph owner, looking like an MG is not a good thing.

An S is an S! It doesn't need to change!

A Chim is just confused and boring, so they have to play with them.

Balls out guys and accept the fact that our cars are great as they are.

BountyHunter

1,050 posts

223 months

Sunday 24th March 2013
quotequote all
AutoAndy said:
!!!! Forget speed six lights on an S. they don't need it.
Yes they help the Chim golf buggies, but that because they look like mgb's, and speaking as a former Triumph owner, looking like an MG is not a good thing.

An S is an S! It doesn't need to change!

A Chim is just confused and boring, so they have to play with them.

Balls out guys and accept the fact that our cars are great as they are.
AutoAndy said:
!!!! Forget speed six lights on an S. they don't need it.
Yes they help the Chim golf buggies, but that because they look like mgb's, and speaking as a former Triumph owner, looking like an MG is not a good thing.

An S is an S! It doesn't need to change!

A Chim is just confused and boring, so they have to play with them.

Balls out guys and accept the fact that our cars are great as they are.
ok i'll bite (though im sure your comments were a little tongue in cheek)
ive now owned both a 24v S and a Chim 450 so am in a good place to comment

the S was ace if somewhat uncomfy
far quicker than a standard one too
handled great.
looked lovely
boot useless when roof down

the Chim is a whole different ball game.
massively quicker
much much more comfy
handles just as well if not better
useable boot
id say a better looking car too oh and FA like an MG imo

oh yeah one other thing - boring it is not tongue out

S2Mike

3,065 posts

179 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
So anyone thought about a swoopy perspex aerodynamic headlamp cover, on an S, sort of E-Type Jag / Griffith thing. Or would this just make poor lighting even worse? and not really improve looks. ??
Just a thought I have enough other jobs to do without changing these.

Griffinr

1,017 posts

203 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
S2Mike said:
So anyone thought about a swoopy perspex aerodynamic headlamp cover, on an S, sort of E-Type Jag / Griffith thing. Or would this just make poor lighting even worse? and not really improve looks. ??
Just a thought I have enough other jobs to do without changing these.
There was a thread on perspex covers a while ago, I think someone even made some. Would be a nightmare to seal and still be removable for bulb changes.

poor lighting?
Nowt wrong with mine, got cheap glass fronted free forms with Osram +90 bulbs and they're fine.
Rob

S2Mike

3,065 posts

179 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
Some racing MGB's had them that just hook under a tag at the top and screw fixed at the lower front, not air or water tight but without the chrome trim ring I think they may fit similarly.

BountyHunter

1,050 posts

223 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
S2Mike said:
So anyone thought about a swoopy perspex aerodynamic headlamp cover, on an S, sort of E-Type Jag / Griffith thing. Or would this just make poor lighting even worse? and not really improve looks. ??
Just a thought I have enough other jobs to do without changing these.
i did consider it yes
would it improve the looks, well imo yes it would - also the aerodynamics would be slightly improved too.

but yeah i reckon it would affect the lighting to a small degree (though there are ways of improving that)

Alan Whitaker

2,054 posts

211 months

Monday 25th March 2013
quotequote all
Hi All
I do think it looks ok, how mutch cash and time, quite a bit of both I would think.

Alan

swimmer27

482 posts

211 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
BountyHunter said:
ok i'll bite (though im sure your comments were a little tongue in cheek)
ive now owned both a 24v S and a Chim 450 so am in a good place to comment

the S was ace if somewhat uncomfy
far quicker than a standard one too
handled great.
looked lovely
boot useless when roof down

the Chim is a whole different ball game.
massively quicker
much much more comfy
handles just as well if not better
useable boot
id say a better looking car too oh and FA like an MG imo

oh yeah one other thing - boring it is not tongue out
Hi have to agree BountyHunter
Last year I had an invite from a PH member local to me who owns a 4.5 Chimaera.
He took me for a 30 minute blast on very damp country roads, not only does the Chim have so much pulling power it was so planted, I couldn't belive the corner speeds we were achieving also the acceleration from 50pmh onwards was incredible and very comfortable too.
If I had the finances then I would love to own a Chim but with the value of my S2 around £3-3500 and no money left after my divorce I will continue to enjoy my S2 for what it is, and that's a wonderful small British sports car.

Griffinr

1,017 posts

203 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
swimmer27 said:
Hi have to agree BountyHunter
Last year I had an invite from a PH member local to me who owns a 4.5 Chimaera.
He took me for a 30 minute blast on very damp country roads, not only does the Chim have so much pulling power it was so planted, I couldn't belive the corner speeds we were achieving also the acceleration from 50pmh onwards was incredible and very comfortable too.
If I had the finances then I would love to own a Chim but with the value of my S2 around £3-3500 and no money left after my divorce I will continue to enjoy my S2 for what it is, and that's a wonderful small British sports car.
Have driven my sons Chimera a bit recently and I can understand what your saying but it was a joy getting back in the S, a far more raw and engaging driving experience.
Rob.

Longers

4,505 posts

257 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
I've owned both and they are totally different cars. Yes, Chim is more refined/comfortable, better as a practical choice as an everyday TVR and more powerful but...
Griffinr hit the nail on the head when he said:
... it was a joy getting back in the S, a far more raw and engaging driving experience.

BountyHunter

1,050 posts

223 months

Tuesday 26th March 2013
quotequote all
Griffinr said:
but it was a joy getting back in the S, a far more raw and engaging driving experience.
Rob.
ive heard this arguement before - but tbh in this case i feel raw simply = a lack of refinement and this perhaps fools you into finding it more engaging

I certainly dont find the S has any extra feel (either seat of the pants or steering) over a Chim. I find both of them to be a delight to hustle with decent feel over what the car is doing.