Another what DSLR camera question...
Another what DSLR camera question...
Author
Discussion

Bing o

Original Poster:

15,184 posts

248 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
OK so I'm going to scratch my DSLR itch. The thing is, I know nothing about them. I've had a play with a few, but apart from that, as a Spanish waiter used to say, I know nothing!

So, what I need are your recommendations, key features I need are:

Good for sports (want to capture golf swings so 10fps would be good, also F1, and a bit of footy and cricket)

Landscapes (again, I want to be able to bring depth to golf courses, as well as tropical islands, the Lake District etc)

Low light pictures, especially city scapes.

HD video.

Not massive.

Am also after some lens recommendations based on the above - a decent zoom would be one of the requirements for sports.

TIA

GetCarter

31,250 posts

308 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Most (including me) recommend Canon or Nikon, because there are SO many more new and secondhand lenses available.

Low light is a problem unless you spend big.

18-55 is a good walk around lens. 70-300 good for sport, wildlife.

I take most of my landscapes at about 50mm (Many others prefer much wider - i.e. 20mm ish)



Edited by GetCarter on Sunday 13th March 15:18

Bing o

Original Poster:

15,184 posts

248 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Thanks. What particular models would do what I need?

By low light, I mean restaurants, and taking pictures of people in the nearground, without blacking out the background, or the near ground.

Can someone also explain to me in dummy's language how the mm thing works?!

GetCarter

31,250 posts

308 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Others will be able to recommend models (they will be along). As for mm - the lower the number the wider the shot. 20mm very wide, 300mm very tight.

Below a 300



..and a 24



Edited by GetCarter on Sunday 13th March 16:07

Bing o

Original Poster:

15,184 posts

248 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
I see! I've always been reasonable at composition etc (so I've been told), but never into the techy side before!

I like the look of the Sony a55, and the price, but not sure how wide a choice of lenses there are out there.

SamHH

5,078 posts

245 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Beware that the A55 has limited functionality in 10fps mode. I think you can only use it in automatic exposure. I wouldn't get too hung up on 10fps. Really only the top-of-the-range Canon and Nikon models do it properly and they cost about £3,500. For something like a golf swing, unless you absolutely must photograph a particular swing in a particular position, you can always just photograph the next one.

If you think you're only ever going want a camera and, say, two or three ordinary lenses then any make will do. From what I've read they're all much-of-a-muchness in terms of performance. If you think you'll get seriously into it, then I would agree that Canon or Nikon are best for their range of lenses and accessories. What exact model to get depends on how much you want to spend and whether you fancy the idea of buying second-hand.

tinman0

18,231 posts

269 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Real question is how much money do you have to spend?

BiL scratched a similar itch (but was moving up from Canon xxxDs) and went for the 7d (8fps) + 28-300mm Canon L something or other. Cost him $4k, but it does rock!

sgrimshaw

7,587 posts

279 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
I'm a great fan of the Sony Alpha range, you get great features for a good price.

I would offer a word of caution over the A33 & A55 though. There is a compatibility issue with some Sigma lenses, so it can limit the choice of secondhand lenses.

If you're thinking of the A55, take a look at the A580.

I added an A580 to my collection before Christmas, and it's an impressive piece of kit.


markmullen

15,877 posts

263 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
If you didn't mind the bulk I'd go for a Canon 1D series, probably a !D Mk3 but if you want fast frame rate in a smaller body then a 7D is pretty damn good.

HedgehogFromHell

2,072 posts

208 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
I'm might seem out of my depth here, but I've got a Sony Alpha 200 with 18-55 and 75-300mm lens' and that's served me mightily fine at DTM, Super trucks, Trackdays, BTCC, Local meets, Iraq, Afghanistan, Kenya, France.. Virtually everything

ETA: I'm a mong, didn't read HD Video.. But i use a separate HD HDD/SD camcorder

Edited by HedgehogFromHell on Sunday 13th March 19:16


Edited by HedgehogFromHell on Sunday 13th March 19:17

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Theres only 2 SLR's that realy do 10fps, canons 1D3 and canons 1D4.

Nikons D300, D300s, D700, D3 all do 8fps, canons 7D does 8fps too.

A more realistic option would be a canon 50D at 6.5fps, but that doesnt do video.

Canons 7D does video at up to 60fps (720p) which may be a better option for golf swings, as you dont realy need 18mp to study them I suspect.

Not sure I would bother looking at the sony mirrorless bodies.

tinman0

18,231 posts

269 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Not sure I would bother looking at the sony mirrorless bodies.
Never realised some of the Sony kit was mirror less. What's the point of a DSLR without a proper pentaprism and mirror?

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
tinman0 said:
Never realised some of the Sony kit was mirror less. What's the point of a DSLR without a proper pentaprism and mirror?
Only the a33 and a55 are mirrorless, it has advantages (i.e. phase focusing in live view, easy 10fps etc) but has some big disadvantages too.

Sonys real SLR's (ones with mirrors) arnt great for sports typicaly.

Simpo Two

92,730 posts

294 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
SamHH said:
For something like a golf swing, unless you absolutely must photograph a particular swing in a particular position, you can always just photograph the next one.
The bulk of a golf swing is so fast you're unlikely to get a particular position anyway; in fact you could probably do as well using single shot and good reflexes. If capturing golf swings is your prime aim you'd be better looking at video cameras - which start at 25fps smile

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Golf swing takes about what 2 seconds total. But the fast part is 100-140mph or so , it will require a very fast shutter speed, thus fast lens and lots of light or flash (and a decent one to fire multiple shots).


IMO better to set up for One shot during a swing with a couple of flashes and a fast lens and have multiple swings, or video it (which will still need plenty of light for fast shutter).

14-7

6,233 posts

220 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
tinman0 said:
Real question is how much money do you have to spend?
Best question yet!

Simpo Two

92,730 posts

294 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Do it in the dark and set the flash to strobe...

Or buy lots of cameras: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eadweard_Muybridge

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Do it in the dark and set the flash to strobe...
And one exposure? That could work well ...

Simpo Two

92,730 posts

294 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
And one exposure? That could work well ...
Yep, shutter open all the way.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Sunday 13th March 2011
quotequote all
Can you synch more than 1 flash strobing? Or even do that off camera, canon wont do wireless strobing I dont think so would need remote triggers & I assume a powerfull flash as you would want quite a few flashes during the exposure over 1 sec or so.