Thinking of downgrading
Author
Discussion

Stu247

Original Poster:

815 posts

275 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Hi all, as the title suggests I'm thinking of downgrading from a DSLR to a compact.
Currently have a Canon 40D but in the last year or so have found myself not taking it out as much as I should.
I think about it then say to myself "nah can't be arsed, too big to lug around"
To cut a long story short, I'm considering bunging all my stuff on ebay and buying a decent compact.
Currently have,
Canon 40D & Grip
EF24-105mm F4L
EF400mm F5.6L
EF50mm F1.8
Sigma 10-20
Tamron SP90

Really want something as close to a DSLR as I can without it being a chore to carry around.
Full manual, remote shutter release capability etc.
I know I would take more photos as a result, oh and I maybe want to buy an old Honda dominator or transalp with the funds.
Looking at the usual suspects, G12 / Lumix et...any suggestions...am I mad ????

Nick Grant

5,497 posts

264 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
If I were doing this, I'd be looking at the Fuji x100.

clk55pete

868 posts

235 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
How about a Micro four thirds camera - eg GF1 or GF2?

Bungleaio

6,587 posts

231 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
I've recently done this and bought a Sony NEX 5, I'm very pleased with it.

Kermit power

29,622 posts

242 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Have you considered selling off just the lenses in favour of something the Sigma 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM?

It's tiny, ways next to nothing and gives you that very long zoom range. OK, that plus a 40D body is still going to be bigger than a compact, but it still gives you most of the convenience, and could you really handle going back to just a compact alone?

dblack1

230 posts

190 months

Saturday 1st January 2011
quotequote all
Just buy a second camera

scottishDiva

5 posts

188 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
Like what?

Deluded

4,968 posts

220 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
Lumix lx-3 or lx-5?

Vipers

33,502 posts

257 months

Sunday 2nd January 2011
quotequote all
Canon G11




smile

Stu247

Original Poster:

815 posts

275 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
I have to say the LX5 does look a good option!

CVP

2,799 posts

304 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
clk55pete said:
How about a Micro four thirds camera - eg GF1 or GF2?
This would be where my cash would go, slightly used GF1 with the 20mm f1.7 lens.

toasty

8,405 posts

249 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
Leica M9

CVP

2,799 posts

304 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
toasty said:
Leica M9
Whilst a wonderful idea, in general it would also mean downgrade to the number of kidneys he has. Just how eye watering are the Leica prices ! It's easy to be 10k deep just for the body and juts one or two lenses - ouch

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
toasty said:
Leica M9
I like your style. Shame leica charge so much!

Would love a ff rangefinder with no AA filter, guess it wont happen this side of a lottery win.

OP - If your not using the gear sell it on and buy an S95 or G12 , LX5 etc.

pernod

434 posts

217 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
CVP said:
toasty said:
Leica M9
Whilst a wonderful idea, in general it would also mean downgrade to the number of kidneys he has.
Woah, stop the boat! You're saying all I have to do is sell a kidney?!?!? Now that is surprisingly tempting.

Simpo Two

92,747 posts

294 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
This should get you a spare Leica as well:


pernod

434 posts

217 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
When I want something light and portable, I throw a 50mm lens on and ditch the battery grip - it makes a world of difference.

When I want something really light and portable I use the LX3 however I must admit I've never quite been satisfied with the shots it takes. They are perfectly good but the loss of DoF and increased noise always seems to spoil some of the magic.

It really does depend what you are after though... if it's just to get snaps of the family and friends then a portable is great. If it's to get creative then an SLR or EVIL are the best options by far.

toasty

8,405 posts

249 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
pernod said:
CVP said:
toasty said:
Leica M9
Whilst a wonderful idea, in general it would also mean downgrade to the number of kidneys he has.
Woah, stop the boat! You're saying all I have to do is sell a kidney?!?!? Now that is surprisingly tempting.
Or appear in a Chanel No 5 advert, wasn't Audrey Tatou using one in the latest ad? OK a kidney may be easier.

Seriously, I was thinking the OP would have the budget if he sold the current equipment.

Edit - well a deposit anyway biggrin

Edited by toasty on Tuesday 4th January 23:08

Nick Grant

5,497 posts

264 months

Tuesday 4th January 2011
quotequote all
Those of you saying M9 without the cost have you looked at the Fuji I mentioned in the second post?

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Wednesday 5th January 2011
quotequote all
Nick Grant said:
Those of you saying M9 without the cost have you looked at the Fuji I mentioned in the second post?
Hard to recomend a camera thats not realy out yet? it looks funky but could be a bad mix of quaint and modern.