Discussion
Killwilly said:
Nothing wrong with the Canon 450D and kit lens for starters, you can always add better lenses as you progress.
Taken with my 450D and 18-55IS kit lens

I don't think that's doing the 450D any justice - it's a nice shot but it looks like a massive amount of compression has been applied and the image quality has been lost.Taken with my 450D and 18-55IS kit lens
Edited by Killwilly on Sunday 10th October 07:39
horacethefrog said:
Killwilly said:
I don't think that's doing the 450D any justice - it's a nice shot but it looks like a massive amount of compression has been applied and the image quality has been lost.Gad-Westy said:
Was in a similar predicament a few weeks back and ended up going for a nikon d5000. Typing this on my phone so I'll not waffle on about but it's well worth looking it up.
A side-by-side comparison at the site below.[url]http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/compare_post.asp[url]
Just picked up one of these the other week.
Very impressed with it so far!
http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-pentax-k-x-dig...
Very impressed with it so far!
http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-pentax-k-x-dig...
Sixpackpert said:
Just picked up one of these the other week.
Very impressed with it so far!
http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-pentax-k-x-dig...
It looks a nice little DSLR but ..... the deal breaker for ME (according to the reviews Very impressed with it so far!
http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-pentax-k-x-dig...
) is that there are no visible AF points in viewfinder.Elderly said:
Sixpackpert said:
Just picked up one of these the other week.
Very impressed with it so far!
http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-pentax-k-x-dig...
It looks a nice little DSLR but ..... the deal breaker for ME (according to the reviews Very impressed with it so far!
http://www.warehouseexpress.com/buy-pentax-k-x-dig...
) is that there are no visible AF points in viewfinder.
I found moving from both film (and compact digi) the selection of your AF points/patterns can be one of the easily "assumed" factors in making a real mess of things when learning to use a dslr, one of those skills you learn during the vertical learning curve.
I'm getting the hang of it though (I think) LOL.
The Astro stuff is however a completely different game focus wise.
dtmpower said:
A 500D is in budget (can't stretch to 5D or 7D)
Is there any comparable camera from Sony/Nikon to the 500D ?
I don't have any lenses - complete SLR novice.
Comparatively, Nikon is usually more expensive for the same spec. It's like the Jap four superbikes - you can't go wrong whatever you choose.Is there any comparable camera from Sony/Nikon to the 500D ?
I don't have any lenses - complete SLR novice.
I chose the 500d because I like white lenses

Let me know if you would like to buy mine.
There isnt a huge amount in it between brands now at the entry level , nikon still have a black mark for no body motor so older screw drive lenses wont autofocus, but theres so many nice new ones out there that do its nto that big a deal.
IMO historicaly canons have (for the money) been better sports cameras than any other, not sure thats 100% true anymore, sony seem to be poor on the whole sport shooting side of things (slower af slower fps longer blackouts etc).
IMO historicaly canons have (for the money) been better sports cameras than any other, not sure thats 100% true anymore, sony seem to be poor on the whole sport shooting side of things (slower af slower fps longer blackouts etc).
dtmpower said:
A 500D is in budget (can't stretch to 5D or 7D)
Is there any comparable camera from Sony/Nikon to the 500D ?
The 500D does video. Sony only offer video on their SLT cameras (a33, a55) and not the SLRs as yet so no direct equivalent. Do you want video?Is there any comparable camera from Sony/Nikon to the 500D ?
Video aside, the Sony a450/500/550 seem to be broadly similar. Advantages - you get image stabilisation in the body, so all lenses the camera can detect will be stabilised; in addition to Sony's own lenses and the 3rd parties (Sigma, Tamron, Tokina) you can get lovely autofocus Zeiss lenses (not available on Canon or Nikon); much s/h Minolta glass is available which works as it is the same mount, some of it is excellent (sony bought the DSLR business from Minolta).
Disadvantages - you can't get the £5k+ behemoths of lenses that you can for Canikon - 400/2.8, 200/2 etc - I point this out as people often say "no glass" for Sony and those are the lenses you can't get in that mount, there are fewer Chinese knock-off copy accessories available for Sony than there are for Canon or Nikon, the hotshoe mount is different, meaning you would need to buy a £8 adapter on ebay to use the 'traditional' hotshoe flashes that can be fitted to Canon & Nikon bodies rather than flashes designed to fit the Sony mount.
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff





