Starting point for filters
Starting point for filters
Author
Discussion

muppetdave

Original Poster:

2,118 posts

254 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
Along with getting a wider lens soon, I'd like to start using some decent filters and trying my hand at a few more landscapes. Constantly frustrated with getting the balance of the sky and land, can anyone suggest a good starting point (I see Cokin do a 'P-Series' Starter kit with the filter holder etc) for the world of 'proper' filters - obviously an ND grad (but to what level initially) and perhaps a warm-up? (Circ Polarizer goes without saying if my existing one doesn't fit the new lens).

SamHH

5,078 posts

245 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
If you want to use graduated filters, then obviously you'll need a filter holder and square filters. The two most popular choices are Cokin P series (cheap) and Lee (expensive). I bought some P series ones but now I think it'd have been better to go for the Lee ones in the first place. You may find the P series are good enough though; depends how picky you are. If you're using a digital camera, then I personally don't see the point in warm-up filters.

muppetdave

Original Poster:

2,118 posts

254 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
Thanks for that. To be fair I'd rather 'buy once' and if the difference is noticeable I'd rather start off at the right end of the scale smile

GetCarter

31,256 posts

308 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
I went from Cokin to Lee and Lee are very silly money, but optically they are far better.

I use ND grads .9 and .6 hard (sometimes both together). The 'hard' bit denotes that the grad is more defined - which I find better for landscapes.

muppetdave

Original Poster:

2,118 posts

254 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
Thanks Steve, was hoping you'd pipe up wink

ian in lancs

3,853 posts

227 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
Cokin scratch very easily frown Especially when two are kept in the same box......

GetCarter

31,256 posts

308 months

Friday 8th October 2010
quotequote all
So do Lee I'm afraid... but Lee do come with sexy pouches.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
I've had cokin for a while. The CPL is fine.

The ND and grads stink, horrid colour cast I'm hating more and more.

Probably be buying some Lee ones soon.

markmullen

15,877 posts

263 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
I've got hitech grads, price wise between Cokin and Lee and no apparent colour cast.

In terms of storage I bought a CD case, it works a treat, I can label the sleeves and it only cost £2.

muppetdave

Original Poster:

2,118 posts

254 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
Lee digital SLR foundation kit by the sounds of it then (hadn't found it before for some odd reason) - on the Xmas list!

Toyless

25,721 posts

250 months

Saturday 9th October 2010
quotequote all
Agree wholeheartedly on the cokon colour cast.

Very irritating.

Jez64

2,193 posts

214 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
I've been looking at getting some filters myself, looks like
Lee are the way to go.

omohat

361 posts

259 months

Sunday 10th October 2010
quotequote all
markmullen said:
I've got hitech grads, price wise between Cokin and Lee and no apparent colour cast.
I too went for hitech grads and can recommend them. While I'd love Lee or Singh Ray filters I'm glad I didn't spend that much because I hardly ever use the filters. The hitechs are fine for occasional use and I've never noticed a color cast.

I bought mine from teamwork photo as I lived in London at the time:

http://www.teamworkphoto.com/index.php?main_page=p...