14mp+ Digital Camera?
Author
Discussion

mhthegoblin

Original Poster:

2 posts

196 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
Hi all,

Newbie here smile

I'm after a digital camera. Doesn't have to be too special beyond a) a high resolution (12MP minimum) and b) reliable and likely to last a while. I'm looking into this - http://ubuyhardware.com/p~p-1848567000~b-402~Olymp... - do you guys think it'd be appropriate? Any suggestions of an alternative?

Thanks in advance!

Davi

17,153 posts

250 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
wot he said ^^

high MP are just a good marketing gimmick with little (or no!) relevance to picture quality.

Scott330ci

18,294 posts

231 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
Mega Pixels aren't everything.

As far as I know the higher the megapixels or a smaller sensor can actually make the image worse.


Goochie

5,797 posts

249 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
I was looking at similar cameras 6 months back and settled on the Canon SX200 IS. It came down to a choice between that and the Panasonic TZ7 at the time but the Panasonic had reliability issues according to numerous reports on the web.

The SX200IS has recently been replaced with a new version so is now a bargain.

It will shoot in full-auto, full manual or anywhere in between.


Davi

17,153 posts

250 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
wife has the Pan Lumix TZ8, fantastic pictures but one of the most annoying cameras I've ever come across. You press the shutter, pop it down, go make a cuppa, drink it, have some lunch, come back, pick up the camera and hope everything has stayed in place the last hour or so before it decides to fire the shot.

clonmult

10,529 posts

239 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
Scott330ci said:
Mega Pixels aren't everything.

As far as I know the higher the megapixels or a smaller sensor can actually make the image worse.
Especially in smaller cameras.

These compacts are tending to have the same size sensors as the pixel counts creep up. That means that each little pixel is even smaller, which results in less light getting to it.

If you're after a waterproof though, unsure about that Olympus, but the equivalents from Canon (D10) and Panasonic (FT1) can be had for around £200. Both very good cameras, the Canon better if you want to do something slightly more serious underwater, the Panasonic having the edge in video recording.

GetCarter

31,263 posts

309 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
There is a simple answer to this MP thing... SENSOR SIZE [divided by] MP

Then you'll have a fairly good idea how it will perform.

14mp on a sensor half the size of a postage stamp will be a car crash in anything other than good light.

With digital cameras, you generally get what you pay for.

TuxRacer

13,933 posts

221 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
Budget?

Oily Nails

2,932 posts

230 months

Wednesday 14th July 2010
quotequote all
Thank god this thread came along, recently been pondering getting a new point and shoot, rather liking the reviews of this...

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/B0036WN2K4/ref=...

Nikon S8000



Whats the PH opinion?

mhthegoblin

Original Poster:

2 posts

196 months

Tuesday 20th July 2010
quotequote all
Thanks for all the insight, guys.

Budget's about $400. Underwater capability is crucial.

I'll have a look at the Canon and Panasonic models suggested smile

Goochie

5,797 posts

249 months

Tuesday 20th July 2010
quotequote all
mhthegoblin said:
Thanks for all the insight, guys.

Budget's about $400. Underwater capability is crucial.

I'll have a look at the Canon and Panasonic models suggested smile
You wont get an underwater camera with that spec at that price point. Underwater photographers usually use an additional case for a normal SLR type camera, so have a look for cases for the Canon and Panasonic.