Full frame vs cropped sensor
Full frame vs cropped sensor
Author
Discussion

rottie102

Original Poster:

4,033 posts

214 months

Monday 10th May 2010
quotequote all
Is it worth it?
I'm pretty happy with my 450D, I mainly shoot fashion, portraits etc with 50MM 1.4 Sigma but I also have a Canon 85mm 1.8 to stay within 50mm on a full frame.

I was thinking to replace my 450D with 5D MKI... Anyone made that move?

itsnotarace

4,685 posts

239 months

Monday 10th May 2010
quotequote all
You're going back a generation (and 3 years tech) on the the image processing. I'd say get better glass tbh

rottie102

Original Poster:

4,033 posts

214 months

Monday 10th May 2010
quotequote all
Well, from what I've read the only better glass there is, is 50mm 1.2L. And with difference in price I could get a 5D MKII...
So no point in side-grading smile to 5D MKI?

Muska

1,174 posts

212 months

Monday 10th May 2010
quotequote all
A 5Dmk1 will be leagues ahead of a 450D in terms of IQ i'd put money on.

I can't comment directly as i'm a Nikon user but I know of more than a few wedding photographers who choose to use a 5D still.


itsnotarace

4,685 posts

239 months

Monday 10th May 2010
quotequote all
Considering you said you're happy with the 450D already, unless the 5D has a particular feature you can't live without it just seems like change for the sake of change. As for glass, I was thinking more along the lines of 70-200 2.8 L IS which is an awesome bit of kit.

Ed_P

701 posts

299 months

Monday 10th May 2010
quotequote all
If you're doing mainly fashion and portraits, then you are likely to see some improvement in image quality with the 5DMk1. Don't expect a "massive" improvement though, because what you're using produces decent IQ already.

I often shoot at events with another photographer. Between us we have a 350D, 40D, 5DMk1 and a 1DMk3. I get to process all the images (in Lightroom) so have the opportunity to compare quality side-by-side. I have to say that I'm often hard-pressed to know what cameras the images are from. The main differences are in high-ISO situations or when significant cropping is required prior to printing. Even then, the 350D performs pretty well. All cameras though have L-quality lenses though or the Canon 17-55mm F2.8 (which is reckoned to have L-quality for IQ).

OK, this doesn't help much! If it makes a difference though, I did notice that once I upgraded to the 5D and 40D (and later to the 5D and 1D), other "ordinary" photographers assumed that I must be good because I had the "pro" gear (I am good of course!). That's probably the biggest difference you'll notice at first!




LongQ

13,864 posts

263 months

Monday 10th May 2010
quotequote all
Ed_P said:
If you're doing mainly fashion and portraits, then you are likely to see some improvement in image quality with the 5DMk1. Don't expect a "massive" improvement though, because what you're using produces decent IQ already.
For portraits and fashion in particular a better control of Depth of Field may be another big gain. It certainly should be but there is a chance that individual styles may not require what a shallower DoF offers.

itsnotarace

4,685 posts

239 months

Monday 10th May 2010
quotequote all
Ed_P said:
I have to say that I'm often hard-pressed to know what cameras the images are from. The main differences are in high-ISO situations or when significant cropping is required prior to printing.
Precisely

d1d215

266 posts

205 months

Monday 10th May 2010
quotequote all
rottie102 said:
Well, from what I've read the only better glass there is, is 50mm 1.2L. And with difference in price I could get a 5D MKII...
So no point in side-grading smile to 5D MKI?
there is no need for a 1.2 ! smile . get the 85mm 1.4 would be my advice + some more light .