Flash Gun advice pelase
Author
Discussion

paddy27

Original Poster:

1,745 posts

264 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
Am looking tog et a SB-800 to go with my Nikon D200. Keep seeing Nissin & Sunpak flash guns advertised saying as good as Nikon & canon own flashes. Have only had Nikon own brand flashes before.
Has anyone got any experiance or adice about these other brands please?
Yes i know the sb-800 is only avliable second hand but i can't really afford the sb-900.

Thanks

Simpo Two

92,838 posts

295 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
paddy27 said:
Am looking tog et a SB-800 to go with my Nikon D200. Keep seeing Nissin & Sunpak flash guns advertised saying as good as Nikon & canon own flashes. Have only had Nikon own brand flashes before.
Has anyone got any experiance or adice about these other brands please?
Yes i know the sb-800 is only avliable second hand but i can't really afford the sb-900.

Thanks
I can't help with the other brands, but can recommend the SB-800. I bought the first one a few years ago when faced with my first wedding, and later bought another as backup. I didn't get the SB-900 as it was much bulkier but not significantly more powerful, and I'd heard stories about it overheating (it has a very fast recycle time). Personally I would always stay with Nikon - peace of mind and guaranteed compatibility is more important to me than a few £ saved.

The SB-800 is a very complex beast - the manual is tougher than the D200 - but unless you want to do any clever stuff like off-camera work and CLS (I don't) then you can work very well with just a few favourite settings.

In about 30,000 shots an SB-800 has only failed me once - it simply stopped working and seemed to need a 'reboot'. The battery hatch can get a bit loose with time and is probably the weakest link - a good reason for not taking it on and off to fit the fifth battery option (which I don't use because AAs and chargers seem to come in multiples of 4!)

jon-

16,534 posts

246 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
I didn't get the SB-900 as it was much bulkier but not significantly more powerful
200mm zoom though. Mmmm, something us Canon strobists can only dream of.

paddy27

Original Poster:

1,745 posts

264 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
Cheers Simpo. I think your right, i'll probably stay with Nikon anyway, just thought i would see what others thought.
I dont do anything complex with flashes so think i'll be alright.

Thanks for the help.

Simpo Two

92,838 posts

295 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
jon- said:
200mm zoom though. Mmmm, something us Canon strobists can only dream of.
In fact I often use mine with a 70-200mm lens - although I agree the light will overspill the field of view and therefore be a little less bright, it seems that the rest of the system allows for this (TTL metering I suspect, but once you put a Speedlight onto a Nikon quite what they talk about between them is still a mystery to me... as long as they reach an amicable agreement I'm happy!)

jon-

16,534 posts

246 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
You suspect correctly. The only advantage the 200mm zoom will bring you is a touch more reach.

I want a 200mm zoom as it's like an inbuilt snoot smile

Simpo Two

92,838 posts

295 months

Thursday 10th December 2009
quotequote all
You can buy them - I think they're called flash extenders.

For myself I slap the lens on f2.8, increase ISO as much as I dare and crank up the EV until the pips squeak. If that's still not enough (large church for example) then I fix the rest in RAW processing smile