Discussion
After the help I received on here recently I jumped in at the deepend and bought a D700 today with 8gb extreme card, an 14-24 f2.8 and a 24-70 f2.8 and the battery grip to get the 8 fps.
Only had a chance to play with it indoors in dim light......1st impressions ..... it is a well built beast weighty with it, even heavier with the battery grip on. It's also so well balanced and very easy to hold steady and OMG does it produce some crisp sharp images in a low light environment even with the iso as low as 250.....I am completely blown away by the quality. I was a bit daunted about moving from Canon as I am so comfortable with it's operating system, but the Nikon is soooo much easier and faster to use.
Can't wait for daylight .........
Only had a chance to play with it indoors in dim light......1st impressions ..... it is a well built beast weighty with it, even heavier with the battery grip on. It's also so well balanced and very easy to hold steady and OMG does it produce some crisp sharp images in a low light environment even with the iso as low as 250.....I am completely blown away by the quality. I was a bit daunted about moving from Canon as I am so comfortable with it's operating system, but the Nikon is soooo much easier and faster to use.
Can't wait for daylight .........
Just messing around in the house this evening and with only two soft light table lamps on I had crisp images at iso 200 .......was curious about how much light I could shoot in and still get a result so I switched off both lamps and was in near darkness......upped the iso to 600 and shutter down to 1/30 at 20mm and had a clear image with a bit of noise but an acceptable result .....with only one light on and iso at 250 the image was almost perfect......very impressive.
taaffy said:
Yes it is........but tonight in near darkness I had very acceptable results at 600 not having to go anywhere near 1600.....so in normal low light situations with the ability to keep the iso lower will provide near perfect results.
Hm, either your perception of near darkness is different from mine or you had auto-iso on... I have had a D700 for almost a year and it's fantastic, but ISO 600 and 1/30 at 2.8 will not get me decent results in near-darkness... Good quality at that ISO-level was also easily attainable with my D200, the difference between a D200, D300 or D700 with those parameters would not be very big (forgetting DOF for a moment).Edited by taaffy on Friday 2nd October 21:12
Anyway, have fun, it's a great camera and I still discover new possibilities after a year of ownership.
Maarten
mmertens said:
taaffy said:
Yes it is........but tonight in near darkness I had very acceptable results at 600 not having to go anywhere near 1600.....so in normal low light situations with the ability to keep the iso lower will provide near perfect results.
Hm, either your perception of near darkness is different from mine or you had auto-iso on... I have had a D700 for almost a year and it's fantastic, but ISO 600 and 1/30 at 2.8 will not get me decent results in near-darkness... Good quality at that ISO-level was also easily attainable with my D200, the difference between a D200, D300 or D700 with those parameters would not be very big (forgetting DOF for a moment).Edited by taaffy on Friday 2nd October 21:12
Anyway, have fun, it's a great camera and I still discover new possibilities after a year of ownership.
Maarten
paul911 said:
Hey Taffy, how’s the kids mate, must be growing up fairly fast now? You still in contact with Greg (sp) and the others from Porschaforum?
Sorry for the OT guys!
Kids are doing just fine,still alive lol.......Chat with grieg now and again but he is so busy jetting around.....been out to Ali's pad in Lake como for a boys weekend been a scot too long in Wales as I could not keep up with the beer consumption....Porschaforum now folded so we keep up in facebook.Sorry for the OT guys!
I'd also be surprised at being able to use those settings at ISO600.
And bearing in mind the giant leap from the EOS you had, I would expect you'd have been gutted had you not seen massive results (the camera's 10x the price nearly!)...the 1D range, for example, would have shown something of a leap. As would, in all probability, a 5D/7D etc...
If you can get solid results, I may have made a mistake sticking with Canon
Post up some pics - a new toy's always worth some posts!!
And bearing in mind the giant leap from the EOS you had, I would expect you'd have been gutted had you not seen massive results (the camera's 10x the price nearly!)...the 1D range, for example, would have shown something of a leap. As would, in all probability, a 5D/7D etc...
If you can get solid results, I may have made a mistake sticking with Canon
Post up some pics - a new toy's always worth some posts!!mmertens said:
taaffy said:
Yes it is........but tonight in near darkness I had very acceptable results at 600 not having to go anywhere near 1600.....so in normal low light situations with the ability to keep the iso lower will provide near perfect results.
Hm, either your perception of near darkness is different from mine or you had auto-iso on... I have had a D700 for almost a year and it's fantastic, but ISO 600 and 1/30 at 2.8 will not get me decent results in near-darkness... Good quality at that ISO-level was also easily attainable with my D200, the difference between a D200, D300 or D700 with those parameters would not be very big (forgetting DOF for a moment).Edited by taaffy on Friday 2nd October 21:12
Anyway, have fun, it's a great camera and I still discover new possibilities after a year of ownership.
Maarten
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



contrats on a very nice setup, i look forward to some nice images