January 2009 Photo Competition - Winners!
January 2009 Photo Competition - Winners!
Author
Discussion

theRossatron

Original Poster:

1,032 posts

262 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
It's been fun watching the images roll in, some really great ones, some interesting ones and two of a cat(?) smile

anyway the winners are:

3rd Place - I really liked that someone managed to get a light-hearted image in from a seemingly dark topic. This made me laugh, it's a fun image!
From Viggen114



2nd Place - this really caught my eye, the blacks are so black and it's interesting that the irregular shapes of the broken glass still form an eerie pattern!
From 9.3


1st Place - Although I never usually feel heavily photoshopped images fit within the Photo competition, this composition of two images really work together and best fits the theme. Really portrays some pain, well done!
From Stigmundfreud


Congrats to all the winners! And thanks to everyone who submitted.

DKMsport

1,970 posts

219 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
Honestly not the three I was expecting to win (no I wasnt expecting a result in my favour lol)
But well done to all 3 of you...looking forward to this months competition now!

staceyb

7,107 posts

254 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
That’s not a photo, it's a computer generated image. But each to their own. The other 2 are lovely.

Dogsey

4,301 posts

260 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
Well done Stiggy, can't wait to see what you going to think up for Febuary!

beer

stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

240 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
Excellent! I didnt think, based on the other shots, how it was going to do but I felt it fitted scarred nicely! Chuffed for this but will now have to think of a topic PDQ as I wasn't expecting to win this month.

Stacey, its still a photo just 2 photos cleverly blended together wink

staceyb

7,107 posts

254 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
stigmundfreud said:
Stacey, its still a photo just 2 photos cleverly blended together wink
If you didn’t have a computer you wouldn't have been able to produce the image. Don’t get me wrong, I love the end product but it isn't a photograph.

miniman

30,104 posts

292 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
staceyb said:
stigmundfreud said:
Stacey, its still a photo just 2 photos cleverly blended together wink
If you didn’t have a computer you wouldn't have been able to produce the image. Don’t get me wrong, I love the end product but it isn't a photograph.
That's like saying to a film photographer, if you didn't have that mix of chemicals you wouldn't be able to produce the image, though, isn't it.

Jack Blag

941 posts

243 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
The face could have been projected onto the cracked texture and then photographed... it was just easier and quicker to do it in Photoshop!

9.3

1,212 posts

222 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
Thanks for the 2nd place, (much appreciated!), but I have to admit that having photographed it, I too used a computer to enhance the image........

miniman

30,104 posts

292 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
9.3 said:
Thanks for the 2nd place, (much appreciated!), but I have to admit that having photographed it, I too used a computer to enhance the image........
Of course you did, we all do. It's no different to changing the developing process slightly for film. The JPG or RAW file is no different to a negative. Uploading your JPG straight to Flickr is akin to using Snappy Snaps to develop and print your negatives - they just stick them through a machine with no skill involved. Post processing in Photoshop is just like having a professional develop your film, or doing it yourself in a darkroom.

toasty

8,412 posts

250 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
I side with Stacey on this one, great image but not a photograph IMHO.

Tweaking the levels, cropping et al are a long way from splicing two separate images together.

Had the cracked mud been projected onto the model and the photograph been taken then it'd be fine in my book.

But of course it's not down to me, it's down to Rossatron who won the right to judge last month as he sees fit.

A bit of controversy always spices things up a touch, so congrats to Stigmund and I look forward to the competition this month.

stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

240 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
Ah I tend to agree that what I did makes it more art than photograph but the rules dont state you can't be creative wink

If you let grapes sour they turn from wine into vinegar hehe

Nurburgsingh

5,550 posts

268 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
you'll be asking for a "polaroids competition" next. Scanned images of polaroids only.

CivicMan

2,211 posts

231 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
I've got some Polaroids......rofl

stigmundfreud

22,454 posts

240 months

Sunday 1st February 2009
quotequote all
CivicMan said:
I've got some Polaroids......rofl
you can get a cream for them

EmmaP

11,758 posts

269 months

Monday 2nd February 2009
quotequote all
staceyb said:
That’s not a photo, it's a computer generated image. But each to their own. The other 2 are lovely.
Photographers now use a computer to do what they used to do with a knife, glue and an airbrush. Less messy and arguably less fun. I miss the smell of chemicals hehe

theRossatron

Original Poster:

1,032 posts

262 months

Monday 2nd February 2009
quotequote all
As I said I usually don't think heavily shopped photos have a place in the competition but this one looked like just two images overlayed - I'm sure it would have been possible in the olden days of ye film?

Perhaps not - still I thought it was the most fitting picture for the theme. Quite a few other entries had some form of photoshopping, selective colour and the like - where would you draw the line? (something to discuss i suppose smile )

EmmaP

11,758 posts

269 months

Monday 2nd February 2009
quotequote all
theRossatron said:
As I said I usually don't think heavily shopped photos have a place in the competition but this one looked like just two images overlayed - I'm sure it would have been possible in the olden days of ye film?

Perhaps not - still I thought it was the most fitting picture for the theme. Quite a few other entries had some form of photoshopping, selective colour and the like - where would you draw the line? (something to discuss i suppose smile )
Yes, stig's photograph would have been possible in the olden days of film. I'd have thought a simple double exposure in he darkroom or sandwiching of film would have achieved a similar result.

As someone who was a film photographer for about 15 years I have no qualms about the use of image manipulation software in these competitions. I think that the visual and technical quality will shine through regardless as will the concept. Image manipulation is just a tool to achieve ends that could be done in the darkroom and its use is a skill in its own right. It isn't cheating. And let's not forget that you can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear.

EmmaP

11,758 posts

269 months

Monday 2nd February 2009
quotequote all
stigmundfreud said:
Ah I tend to agree that what I did makes it more art than photograph but the rules dont state you can't be creative wink

If you let grapes sour they turn from wine into vinegar hehe
Lets' face it, we're not doing reportage here or social documentary where manipulation would bring ethics of manipulation into question. And we all know how images can be manipulated through cropping, by being taken out of context, use of text with image to imply a specific meaning. Photography is an art form.


EmmaP

11,758 posts

269 months

Monday 2nd February 2009
quotequote all
staceyb said:
stigmundfreud said:
Stacey, its still a photo just 2 photos cleverly blended together wink
If you didn’t have a computer you wouldn't have been able to produce the image. Don’t get me wrong, I love the end product but it isn't a photograph.
Oh yes it could have Stacey in many different ways. I would be very interested to know what your definition of a photograph is.