Ark Royal Liverpool
Author
Discussion

bulb763

Original Poster:

870 posts

264 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Thought I may as well start a thread to show these since there's a few (rather than stick them in random photos). Would like opinions on the processing - I've been trying a few things in LR2 and I'm not sure if they're a waste of time.

1


2


3


4


5


6


7



Scho

2,479 posts

233 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
personally i think the first three are brilliant! you can tell they are quite heavily processed but it doesn't look too over the top.

would you mind explaining what processing you did to shot 3?



SamHH

5,078 posts

246 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
I think they're all good; the special effects add to the photos without becoming their sole focus. 4 is my favourite. The only weak one IMO is 7, which looks a bit 'generic HDRey'.

Fetchez la vache

5,907 posts

244 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Great work. I'd be happy with any of them tbh, but for me 1,2 & the B&W one stand out. B&W especially

Simpo Two

92,891 posts

295 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
I like them a lot but by the time I got to the last one I was getting HDR fatigue. HDR is the HP sauce of digital photography - nice now and again but not on every meal.

bulb763

Original Poster:

870 posts

264 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
They aren't all HDR (as you probably noticed) wink Since moving from D200 to D700 I've noticed that there are fewer circumstances where I would use HDR, since there is just so much virtually noise-free detail hiding away in the sliders.
shot 3, erm HDR, then bring back some contrast, filters for sky and FG and I think there is split-toning there too.
I thought that 7 was one of the less extreme of the HDR shots :shrug: should I be using it more liberally then?

Chris71

21,549 posts

272 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Agree with the above - first three look superb. The others very good technically, but look a little bit too artificial for my liking. Just personal opinion though and they're very impressive pieces of work nonetheless.

Pixel-Snapper

5,321 posts

222 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Fantastic images Bulb

number 2 blows me way with the amount of detail everytime i see it.

bulb763

Original Poster:

870 posts

264 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
Pixel-Snapper said:
Fantastic images Bulb

number 2 blows me way with the amount of detail everytime i see it.
It's a beast of a machine!

Andy Mac

73,668 posts

285 months

Friday 23rd January 2009
quotequote all
They would make stunning wallpapers!

mikee boy

967 posts

281 months

Saturday 24th January 2009
quotequote all
For me number 3 is difficult to look at because the colours don't look natural. I'm really into minimal processing at the moment and I love the candid B+W shot.

pikey

7,704 posts

314 months

Saturday 24th January 2009
quotequote all
Think number 2 is fantastic!