Monitor choices.....
Author
Discussion

fathomfive

Original Poster:

11,237 posts

220 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

278 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
Personally I could never go back to working on a single monitor now, for photo editing (and most other stuff) multiple monitors is indispensable! I'd be after two of these - a bit more money than your most expensive one above but loads more screen real estate:

http://www.ebuyer.com/product/143047

Otherwise, in the 24" category I'd consider this:

http://www.ebuyer.com/product/148860

I didn't search for prices, just used ebuyer for comparative purposes



fathomfive

Original Poster:

11,237 posts

220 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
_dobbo_ said:
Personally I could never go back to working on a single monitor now, for photo editing (and most other stuff) multiple monitors is indispensable! I'd be after two of these - a bit more money than your most expensive one above but loads more screen real estate:

http://www.ebuyer.com/product/143047

Otherwise, in the 24" category I'd consider this:

http://www.ebuyer.com/product/148860

I didn't search for prices, just used ebuyer for comparative purposes
Cheers, I like the idea of the two 20" screens, and fantastic value by the looks of it.

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

278 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
The LG screens are very highly rated, one decent review here:

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/labs/206856/lg-l206wu.html

As long as you have a modern graphics card (ie any remotely recent nVidia or ATI one) with two outputs, running two monitors is very simple!

smile

Dogsey

4,301 posts

260 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
I bought a 24" Samsung (can't remember the exact model) earlier this year, absolutely cracking monitor, highly recommended. Only problem is that every other monitor now looks so small! hehe

jazzybee

3,056 posts

279 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
A rather cracking deal on at Dell at the moment:

http://accessories.euro.dell.com/sna/productdetail...

24" HD for £202

Ledaig

1,809 posts

292 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
Which ever you choose, make sure you use some method of colour calibration. I purchased three flat-screen lcd's a while ago, two were the same make and model and the third completely different. The variation in the colours displayed was quit astonishing. Whist the two 'same make' monitors were different, but not far off each other, they were very cool (blue), whereas the third monitor was very green in its output.

This was quickly corrected by using the Huey Pro which had them all looking the same. A failure on my part to do this would have resulted in prints coming back from Photobox etc looking nothing like that displayed.

All three monitors were e-buyer cheap models and have all performed flawlessly for over a year now.

smile

fathomfive

Original Poster:

11,237 posts

220 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
I currently have a 21" Phillips widescreen monitor, so if I go for the Dell and - sure I already do - have a suitable graphics card, I could run those side by side, and use the Dell, when correctly calibrated, for processing my photographs, and my existing Phillips screen purely for menus and the like?

I'm probably being a bit dense, but work is testing at the moment and mind is elsewhere. (He says, staring at his 24" Dell monitor on his desk, that he works on....)

Dogsey

4,301 posts

260 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
fathomfive said:
... sure I already do have a suitable graphics card
Most cards don't support multiple monitors, make sure you check.

V-spec

779 posts

281 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
I have a Dell 30" and the best thing is the memory card slots on the side, no more connecting via USB I just take the card out of the camera and stick it in the screen.
The downside is that photos which look amazing and really 'pop' at home, just look normal or even dull when I look at work or on other people's monitors

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

278 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
Dogsey said:
fathomfive said:
... sure I already do have a suitable graphics card
Most cards don't support multiple monitors, make sure you check.
Every ATI or nVidia card I've seen in the last 5 years supports multiple monitors.

Poverty spec DVI or on board graphics wont be any good, but if it's a 3D card you should be fine.

fathomfive

Original Poster:

11,237 posts

220 months

Monday 29th September 2008
quotequote all
Am liking the Dell one, but going to go for this one: http://www.ebuyer.com/product/148860

A third as much again, but has a better resolution, and I can have it tomorrow instead of 5-7 days time.

The joys of a new hobby smile

fathomfive

Original Poster:

11,237 posts

220 months

Friday 3rd October 2008
quotequote all
Just thought I'd update where I am on this...

Got one of these delivered today: http://www.ebuyer.com/product/130991

Very impressed so far, good quality, crisp image, good price. Well recommended.

Now all I have to do is improve my own output.....

Simpo Two

92,934 posts

295 months

Friday 3rd October 2008
quotequote all
I have twin Sonys. Despite being identical models (albeit bought at different times) I can only get one screen calibrated properly. At least, I can't get them looking exactly the same. So I keep the best as my editing screen and the other is for folders, toolbars, e-mail and other stuff that's not colour-critical. It doesn't seem like much of a difference until you whisk an image from one to the other!

Edited by Simpo Two on Friday 3rd October 15:10

fathomfive

Original Poster:

11,237 posts

220 months

Friday 3rd October 2008
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
I have twin Sonys. Despite being identical models (albeit bought at different times) I can only get one screen calibrated properly. At least, I can't get them looking exactly the same. So I keep the best as my editing screen and the other is for folders, toolbars, e-mail and other stuff that's not colour-critical. It doesn't seem like much of a difference until you whisk an image from one to the other!

Edited by Simpo Two on Friday 3rd October 15:10
I'm running a smaller, 21" Phillips LCD as my desktop, and the 24" Samsung will be calibrated correctly over the next few days - I've just run through the basic settings the monitor came with, but the image quality is way, way better than the Phillips already.

4hero

4,505 posts

241 months

Friday 3rd October 2008
quotequote all
What's the best way to fix dead pixels, I've read so many methods on the interweb and am not sure which to go with..

2 of my 2280000 no worky weeping

AlfaFoxtrot

407 posts

228 months

Friday 3rd October 2008
quotequote all
4hero said:
What's the best way to fix dead pixels, I've read so many methods on the interweb and am not sure which to go with..

2 of my 2280000 no worky weeping
There's nothing 'you' as a user can do is there? I thought once a pixel died, that was kind of it.

Taita

8,005 posts

233 months

Friday 3rd October 2008
quotequote all
You could try rubbing it, daft I know but it works. Also, I think Lifehacker mentioned a utility that tries to get it to display lots of different colours, in the hope to unstick it.

4hero

4,505 posts

241 months

Friday 3rd October 2008
quotequote all
Taita said:
You could try rubbing it, daft I know but it works. Also, I think Lifehacker mentioned a utility that tries to get it to display lots of different colours, in the hope to unstick it.
Yeah, I saw the stuff about rubbing but wasn't sure, will give it a bash though. I'll also take a look for that utility you mention, thanks!

Simpo Two

92,934 posts

295 months

Friday 3rd October 2008
quotequote all
Both my Sonys are pixel-perfect, but maybe I was lucky. By contrast (no pun intended) the cheapo LCD TV I bought for upstairs has two red ones...