BTCC - Knockhill (Sunday)

[flat-planedCrank]

Hi all


A few shots from race day on Sunday...

1.


2.


3.


4.


5.


6.


7.


8.


9.


10.


Comments and crits welcome'd.

I'll post another batch tomorrow, and more to my gallery - http://www.motionimages.co.uk/gallery/Knockhill-17...


Cheers.

[flat-planedCrank]

bump

[ThatPhilBrettGuy]

flat-planedCrank said:

Comments and crits welcome'd.

Tom Chilton can be a right cock at times.

[4hero]

ThatPhilBrettGuy said:

Tom Chilton can be a right cock at times.

Nice shots fp and some great panning going on there! What lens were you using for the panning shots?

Edited by 4hero on Monday 18th August 18:51

[ThatPhilBrettGuy]

4hero said:

Ok then, they're executed fine but not as interesting as these :-

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

or some of these

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

And that's the rub. A load of good photographers all go to the same event, take the same shots then want comments.

So they're fine. Be happy

[flat-planedCrank]

4hero said:

Nice shots fp and some great panning going on there! What lens were you using for the panning shots?

Thanks got some more shots to post - just processing them at the mo..


Just the o'l 70-300mm. No 50mm panning im afraid

Was looking at the 70-200L to replace it but now I'm wondering if I could really do without the 300mm reach.... might have to look at the 100-400L instead.


Cheers.

[4hero]

ThatPhilBrettGuy said:

Ok then, they're executed fine but not as interesting as these :-

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

or some of these

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

And that's the rub. A load of good photographers all go to the same event, take the same shots then want comments.

So they're fine. Be happy

The guy was looking for comments/criticism, you know, to progress his skills. He wasn't looking for advice on what driver is a tit.

[ThatPhilBrettGuy]

flat-planedCrank said:

Was looking at the 70-200L to replace it but now I'm wondering if I could really do without the 300mm reach.... might have to look at the 100-400L instead.

70-200L 2.8? 2x tele and it's the same quality as the 100-400L. I found that 100-400L wasn't always wide enough at times. Ok it'll be a fair bit of swapping around, but I bet that quite often you'll be using the 70-200 as is.

[4hero]

flat-planedCrank said:

Was looking at the 70-200L to replace it but now I'm wondering if I could really do without the 300mm reach.... might have to look at the 100-400L instead.

Let me know when you are heading up next, I'll bring the 100-400 and 70-200f2.8 for you to have a go.

[ThatPhilBrettGuy]

Oh and they're all fine bar number 10 in reflection. The roof being cropped off just doesn't work for me. The rest are fine. Honest!

[flat-planedCrank]

4hero said:

Let me know when you are heading up next, I'll bring the 100-400 and 70-200f2.8 for you to have a go.

Thanks, appreciated

ThatPhilBrettGuy said:

The roof being cropped off just doesn't work for me

Was in two minds over that shot also.
Thanks for the crits.


Cheers.

[john185k]

excellent automotive work as usual - your shots are consistently good

[flat-planedCrank]

Some more shots...

11.


12.


13.


14.


15.


16.


17.


18.


19.


20.


21.


22.


More pics in my gallery - http://www.motionimages.co.uk/gallery/Knockhill-17...


Cheers.

Edited by flat-planedCrank on Monday 18th August 22:33

[Neek]

13 and 21 are brilliant IMO

although all of them are really

George

[kojak]

Some good shots.

[flat-planedCrank]

Thanks guys, appreciated



Cheers.

[sstein]

I really like Motorsport, but the BTCC is a bit pants isn't it.

-

Stuart

[y2blade]

all very good tbh