Put me off the D80 & 16-85 lens
Put me off the D80 & 16-85 lens
Author
Discussion

bdx

Original Poster:

75 posts

219 months

Thursday 24th July 2008
quotequote all
First time posting here so go easy.
Have extensive experience of 35mm slr's. Now want to go digital.
Considering the above combination. D80 meets needs and in budget. Have about £400 to spend on lens. 16-85mm focal length is ok. Does the lens have any downfalls? What others should be considered?

Thanks

106 gti

843 posts

235 months

Thursday 24th July 2008
quotequote all
Im using a D50 with a 18-55 lens and a 70-300 lens for track work and i cant fault it .

Simpo Two

92,942 posts

295 months

Thursday 24th July 2008
quotequote all
You can get a pretty good idea of the quality of a lens by its price. You can however get more lens for your money by looking at good s/h lenses on eBay etc. The combo that worked well for me on my D70 was 18-70 and 70-300, but of course your needs may be different.

AndWhy

2,359 posts

229 months

Friday 25th July 2008
quotequote all
Got my D80 new 11 months ago as my first DSLR. Enjoyed it, and generally impressed with its performance in my hands. Biggest downside for me is its poor performance on long exposures - 2 min + at night - where it suffers from horrendous amp noise (ie interference within the photo). I've found that to get the best out of the body I need to constantly tweak settings such as auto-ISO and in-camera optimisation/ processing. I was disappointed with anything other than ISO100 performance until I started using auto-ISO. Most of the time I shoot RAW to help overcome this but be aware your in-camera optimisation settings (contrast, saturation and sharpening) are not retained in RAW format unless you use Nikon's Capture NX software (c£45 or Capture NX 2 c£120). Don't let this put you off - just accept there's learning and tweaking to do, as I'm sure there would be for any other set up.

As for the lens, I'm unfamiliar with the 16-85. I use almost entirely a Sigma 10-20 and a Nikon 50mm f/1.8. I did have the good fortune to borrow a 18-200 this last weekend which, like the 16-85, has Nikon's VR built in. Fantastic. I don't know how much you'll benefit from the extra width between 18 & 16 mm but the zoom to 200 on the lens I borrowed was superb for discreet shots at the party I was covering. Depends what you're looking for out of your lens really but unless you're convinced you'll never need the extra length I'd suggest you seriously consider the 18-200 w/ VR.

GravelBen

16,526 posts

260 months

Friday 25th July 2008
quotequote all
As said above, the amp noise is an issue for long exposures so if you're into night shots, astro stuff etc then it isn't the best for that.

I'm pretty happy with mine other than that, using 18-70(cheap all-rounder), 50mm f/1.8 and 80-200 f/2.8.

Edited by GravelBen on Friday 25th July 02:05

_dobbo_

14,619 posts

278 months

Friday 25th July 2008
quotequote all
AndWhy said:
I was disappointed with anything other than ISO100 performance until I started using auto-ISO.
Auto ISO? eek

Why would turning on Auto ISO change the performance at anything other than ISO100? confused

AndWhy

2,359 posts

229 months

Friday 25th July 2008
quotequote all
_dobbo_ said:
AndWhy said:
I was disappointed with anything other than ISO100 performance until I started using auto-ISO.
Auto ISO? eek

Why would turning on Auto ISO change the performance at anything other than ISO100? confused
If you're shooting at ISO100 and end up underexposed you can claw back quite a lot from the shadows with no real increase in grain or loss of quality. Shoot at other ISOs and the same isn't true.

But if you shoot with auto-ISO the camera gets the right ISO/ exposure combination and high ISO performance is actually acceptable.

I'm sure that if you shot the same scene manually on the same settings as auto-ISO there'd be no difference, I suppose it's more a case that if you're shooting at high ISO you're better off letting the camera choose the ISO settings for you cos if you get it wrong - for instance the light changes - you could end up disappointed.

ian in lancs

3,853 posts

228 months

Sunday 27th July 2008
quotequote all
I have a D80 and use it extensively - over 800 pictures from a recent trip to Greece. I shoot raw and use Sigma 18-50mm f2.8 with Macro mainly and Sigma 10-20mm, 70mm Macro and the Nikon 55-200mm.

I shoot mainly landscapes/scenes and flowers/macro. The pictures are superb and need very little work in a computer. If you want to shoot action/sport I believe a Canon is better but I don't know why!

The functionality is very good. I've set it up so the aperture and speed command wheels are under finger and thumb, the function button is the focus method and the metering is also easy to change.

It's a great camera. It is just as good used as a snapshot camera too. I have heard that highlights burn out but I've not had a problem.