Honda S2000 - one shot
Author
Discussion

_dobbo_

Original Poster:

14,619 posts

278 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
My new approach to photographing cars means I look to get one or two pictures that I like, rather than taking a frenzied approach and sorting out the results when I get home. I planned this shoot in detail, I drew diagrams, scouted the location, worked out how to deal with reflections in a black car and worked out exactly the results I wanted to get.

Then when I got there I had equipment problems - specifically the optical triggers for my remote flashes would constantly fire themselves despite not being in any sort of direct light.

In any case, I had two pictures in mind and only managed to get one of them - it's not quite what I wanted as the car isn't as well lit as I imagined - mainly because I only had one flash instead of three.

Enough talk - here's the picture - what do you think?



Personally I think it suffers from the lack of light on the car - I'm definately going to pick up some radio triggers now, the optical ones simply don't cut it in the field. I'm sure they work in a studio but that's not much use!

On the plus side I've found what could be a quality location for a couple more shoots, so it's not all bad news. smile

Andy47

132 posts

236 months

Saturday 5th April 2008
quotequote all
I like the work, sounds very thorough and the pic is very good. As you say, bringing more light onto the car would focus the eye better on the subject. There's a lot of sky in the pic, but I'm not certain that cropping some of it out would do much good as the clouds and colour work well. I wouldn't mind seeing a slightly lower shot and getting more light through the windscreen - I don't really know why!

SlimJ

401 posts

259 months

Sunday 6th April 2008
quotequote all
Hi,

Nice car wink

Yeah I think you need more light on the car, at the moment I find my eyes drawn towards the underside of the cloud where it's orange. Probably quite difficult to get right shooting a dark car with a bright background though?

James

trackdemon

13,476 posts

291 months

Sunday 6th April 2008
quotequote all
Nice idea, you are right about the lack of light on the car - I cant see any fill light on it at all. It takes a lot of power to light a dark coloured car!

I'd suggest:

(a) Shoot from lower down. This will give you a more dynamic view of the car, and separate the upper part of the car from the distracting tree lines.

(b) I'd also try getting a little closer, I think this focal length flattens some of the curves of the S2000. (A happy side benefit is this will make your remote flash trigger a bit more reliable)

(c) Take the shot against a darker sky, you'll probably get more interesting colours just before the sky loses all light & you'll have less contrast against the car which will make lighting it easier.

Dont be afraid to composite a few different flash exposures if you're not 100% happy. As an example I did this test shot using all of the above:


CivicMan

2,211 posts

231 months

Sunday 6th April 2008
quotequote all


Bit brighter.

_dobbo_

Original Poster:

14,619 posts

278 months

Sunday 6th April 2008
quotequote all
Thanks for the comments/advice chaps! I'm definitely going to invest in some radio triggers now, I've got a string of cars lined up to shoot so I'll be getting plenty of practice in.

Civicman - I tried using some gradient masks to bring out the car but it always ended up very noisy, so I didn't bother in the end.

smile

_dobbo_

Original Poster:

14,619 posts

278 months

Monday 7th April 2008
quotequote all
I'm supposed to be in Venice right now, but seeing as sleazyjet cancelled our flight and thus wrecked the entire holiday (gory details if you care), I find myself at a bit of a loose end.

Just looking through the shots again and found this one - lower angle, and with a bit of tweaking the exposure on the car looks better - an improvement?



A couple of others from the same session - these are at ISO800 which I've decided is useless, and I wont push the ISO that high again.





And I'll sneak one in of my ugly little Ignis too, can't have too many car pictures on this forum if you ask me.



Edited by _dobbo_ on Monday 7th April 17:03

Goldeeno

698 posts

225 months

Monday 7th April 2008
quotequote all
Can i ask why your going for radio triggers?? Just buy a cheap flashgun with manual setting, pretty much all of them have a pilot or test button. Alot of evening shots on ISO of 100 with a decent f number mean you'll be on 10seconds exposures at least, where you have more than enough time to run round with the 1 flash in ur hand and fire it a few times. Just an option. Better than a few hundred on pocket wizards etc.

_dobbo_

Original Poster:

14,619 posts

278 months

Monday 7th April 2008
quotequote all
I see where you're coming from with the whole running around thing, but that really limits you to either shooting in pitch black, or using a very small aperture and filters to shut out as much light as possible.

I want my flashes to be able to illuminate a subject irrespective of the ambient lighting conditions - which requires radio triggers. I am however thinking more along the lines of £20 ebay ones, rather than £300 pocket wizards! Something along the lines of this, or similar;

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Hot-Shoe-Flash-Wireless-Radi...

smile

JD

3,149 posts

258 months

Wednesday 9th April 2008
quotequote all
_dobbo_ said:
I see where you're coming from with the whole running around thing, but that really limits you to either shooting in pitch black, or using a very small aperture and filters to shut out as much light as possible.

I want my flashes to be able to illuminate a subject irrespective of the ambient lighting conditions - which requires radio triggers. I am however thinking more along the lines of £20 ebay ones, rather than £300 pocket wizards! Something along the lines of this, or similar;

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Hot-Shoe-Flash-Wireless-Radi...

smile
bounce

I got my Radio triggers in the post today

Same type as the ones you linked to

Been playing with them around the house and they seem to work a treat! they feel a lot better built than I was expecting as well!

I ordered from the only UK supplier I could find on ebay

shall have a proper play with them this evening, the range is rather impressive and I can stick a flash inside the car, and take snaps from outside

Its going to be great learning to use them, really means for under £50 I have a remote flash that is adjustable and can go anywhere! (still waiting for my second to turn up)


Out of interest Dobbo, what are you mounting them on? i was going to use one of the mini tripods I got bundled with a compact, but these flashes topple them

_dobbo_

Original Poster:

14,619 posts

278 months

Saturday 12th April 2008
quotequote all
Just back from hols and downloading several hundred pics!

I use a couple of cheap tripods, they have telescopic legs and are reasonably stable - certainly I was using them last night for some long exposure stuff whilst loaded up with the D200. Think they cost about £20 each.

Simpo Two

92,956 posts

295 months

Saturday 12th April 2008
quotequote all
_dobbo_ said:
I want my flashes to be able to illuminate a subject irrespective of the ambient lighting conditions - which requires radio triggers. I am however thinking more along the lines of £20 ebay ones, rather than £300 pocket wizards!
Radio is great. But there's an answer that's cheaper than Pocket Wizards and and bit nicer than Chinese £10 specials: http://www.theflashcentre.com/elinchrom-skyport-un...

I use it when clients are about as it looks a whole lot nicer than a £10 special, though it's more fiddly to use.