ANOTHER "played with camera AND Elise" thread...
ANOTHER "played with camera AND Elise" thread...
Author
Discussion

TonyHetherington

Original Poster:

32,091 posts

280 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
Yup, another weekend, another trip out with the car so I thought I would share some pictures. To be honest, I'm not 100% happy with them and I (rather frustratingly) can't tell why. Welcome comments and criticisms; I'm learning shed loads and love knowing your thoughts.

Strangely I someitmes post photos that I think are fantastic, and you guys think "eh?", then I post photos that I'm not keen on and I hear "WOW!"....

Anyhow, this wasn't the site I wanted - the place I did the security guard to the building site said that all the diggers were getting punctures and so thought my skinny little tyres wouldn't last. So I went for a drive and found this old water station. I liked the location but I just don't think I 'made it work'.

Appreciate your thoughts....
Tony

1.


2.


3.


4.


5.


6.


7.


8.


9.


(edited to add numbers)

Edited by TonyHetherington on Tuesday 9th January 09:14

GetCarter

31,298 posts

309 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
Nice ride TH.

I'd probably have liked no 6 best if that nasty railing wasn't there. I like the side on profile of the Lotus best.

BTW... black cars are a bitch to photo arn't they.

Oh and... have you still got Ted?

Gemm

1,833 posts

245 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
I think focusing is a bit dodgy in some shots. You (or the camera) focused on the wall rather than the Elise. And I've found some shots a bit too tight on the right and left. Also it would be better if the car was facing towards to centre of the picture rather than looking out of the frame. Apart from that, good try, and good location. There's so much potential there.

poah

2,142 posts

258 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
don't have the wheel turned so you can see the tyre tread and also don't have railing blocking the car lol

nice location and contrasts nicely with the car colour.

TonyHetherington

Original Poster:

32,091 posts

280 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
Nice ride TH.

I'd probably have liked no 6 best if that nasty railing wasn't there. I like the side on profile of the Lotus best.

BTW... black cars are a bitch to photo arn't they.

Oh and... have you still got Ted?


Thanks Is indeed my pride and joy - and trust me to get a black car. Not only because it's the most impossible thing to keep swirl-free, but also (as you say) to photograph is very frustrating. Can't wait until it snows; snow shots with a black car, let's set the exposure for that one, hey!?

With number 6 I tried to introduce the railing on purpose just to cut right across the smooth lines of the car. It, unfortunately, didn't work very well and just looks like I couldn't be bothered with the shot hehe

Yup I have Ted - e-mailing this morning to the next guy for an address and he'll be off tomorrow/wed time on his travels again.

GetCarter

31,298 posts

309 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
TonyHetherington said:

Yup I have Ted - e-mailing this morning to the next guy for an address and he'll be off tomorrow/wed time on his travels again.


excellent. Did you take a pic? (If so, I ain't got it yet)

TonyHetherington

Original Poster:

32,091 posts

280 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
Gemm said:
I think focusing is a bit dodgy in some shots. You (or the camera) focused on the wall rather than the Elise. And I've found some shots a bit too tight on the right and left. Also it would be better if the car was facing towards to centre of the picture rather than looking out of the frame. Apart from that, good try, and good location. There's so much potential there.


The focusing is puzzling me; that's been the case in a few of the photographs I took and I can't work out why?! I'm wondering if it focused on the REFLECTION in the car (of the wall), not on the car itself (if you see what I mean?).

Food for thought there on the positioning of the car. I think what I am guilty of is only moving the car once or twice and then just taking many photos of it in that position, rather than working out what shot I want and then moving it to there - this would solve both the problem of the wheels facing the wrong way in shot 1 (thanks Poah thumbup) and also the (sometimes needed) slightly tight cropping.

Thanks again people, as always really appreciate the comments
T

TonyHetherington

Original Poster:

32,091 posts

280 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
GetCarter said:
excellent. Did you take a pic? (If so, I ain't got it yet)


Yup but not processed yet, will send my Chatham Dockyard pic on in the next couple of days thumbup

poah

2,142 posts

258 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
also don;t do silly angles just for the hell of it

TonyHetherington

Original Poster:

32,091 posts

280 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
hmmmm interesting you say that - I thought number 5's angle made the car a lot more imposing towards you?!

cy88

2,808 posts

260 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
I like no 5 best, because the light on the black paint accentuates the curves on the waist of the car nicely. If it were me I might try shopping out the grey stuff on the brick wall and also the drain cover on the floor.

I often find myself trying to take pics from ground level (as in your no 1, and several others). However, perhaps in number one you've gone a bit too low?, making the ground clearance of the car appear greater than it actually is, and drawing the eye to the debris on the floor in the foreground. I would also say (from reading the gravy tutorial) that your front left wheel should be turned the other way, showing off the spokes? All IMHO



Edited by cy88 on Monday 8th January 22:40

Altrezia

8,742 posts

241 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
I really like this set of photos. Good work Tony

Phone_Monkey

1,969 posts

239 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
not really into the photo stuff - my bro is though. It seems to me that yes, the car looks good but in all but the last it doesn't seem to be the main focus of the photo. For example, the first would be really good but there is too much foreground, which takes the attention off the car. Also, set against the red brickwork is a good idea, but there seems to be too much going on in relation to the car itself. that aside, they are much better than what I can do

cossiemetro

1,092 posts

270 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
nice pics very clear and love your car m8

bernie_eccle

309 posts

276 months

Monday 8th January 2007
quotequote all
Tony
Nice car. I think these pics are better than your last batch, but being critical, they don't do it for me. I am not sure that the composition is that great in a lot of them. I prefer the tighter cropped ones. I do like the very last one although perhaps too much of a jaunty angle.
The other criticism I have is that there is a bit too much going on in the background. Whilst the red brick is a nice contrast, I find the grafitti and silver/steel grill distracting as is the spilt sand. I do wonder if some of them would work better in B&W.
But hey don't listen to me I am grateful for you posting as hopefully I will learn from others comments also. As others have mentioned, well worth re-reading Matt's guide to static photo shoots (sorry not sure of URL).

Stewart

EmmaP

11,758 posts

269 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
Great to see that you've been out and about having fun with your camera again and producing some thought provoking images.

• Remind me to hit you very hard if you don't stop framing your shots so tightly.

• I actually like the location but agree that the red is a bit too intense. Red brick can be a royal pain in the arse. You might like to try toning it down a bit in Photoshop.

• The metal shutter is very distracting. The general rule is that one's eye is drawn towards the lightest part of a picture and also to red. Yikes on both counts. You could retouch out the shutter.

• I like very much the composition of shots one and two. These would be great to utilise in an editorial context as there is plenty of space provided for overlay of text or inset pictures. This would then counterbalance the fact that there is a great deal of foreground in shot one. Rules are made to be broken.

Shot 3 is too busy as the eye does not know where to settle.

Shot 4 is not very dynamic.

Shot 5 is good, but needs more room to breathe left and right.

Shot 6 is poorly focused. I often use manual in situations such as this as I do not always trust autofocus. Focusing seems to be a perennial problem for you.

Shot 7. I really am going to have to inflict a hard slap. What have I been telling you for the past 18 months about grass? Grrrr!

Shot 8 does not emphasise key features of car and 9 makes me feel a bit uneasy.

• I think that you need to invest in a step ladder too for the next shoot or else find somewhere to perch so that we can see some shots of the Elise from a higher viewpoint.

It is best, as someone else has said, to previsualise the shot and then keep moving the car. First, set tripod up and then keep moving the car until the angle is just right. This can take an age but it is worth it if you get a good shot. Also, be careful with the direction that the wheels are pointing in.

I for one would like to see you do some abstract, detail shots of your car next.

graham@edinburgh

26,553 posts

255 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
I've always liked the face of the Elise too - ie dead straight on. Specially with a dark one.

ie like this :



Only not shit

(eta - and..erm..straight)

Edited by graham@edinburgh on Tuesday 9th January 00:32

TonyHetherington

Original Poster:

32,091 posts

280 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
Thanks for the comments everyone thumbup

It's interesting getting different people's views on photos...for many reasons. Not only does it provide me with the ability to think more about my photography...looking at it in a different way, analysing it more and (therefore) learning more, but it also gives me an idea on how people receive the pictures.

What always frustrates me when you show friends/family your photographs is that they always say "oh that's nice". No no, that's not what I want to hear!!!! I want to hear "it's great because XXXXXXX but I'd have preferred it better if YYYYYYY"....so it really is valuable for me for you guys to comment. So, again, my thanks.

Emma - I get the feeling you don't like my tight crops? There's going to be some hard hitting, I can tell hehe I must admit, I quite like the car being framed by the corner of the image, and the rest of the image unfolding away from it - not necessarily those images themselves but the theory of it.
The grass thing; you told me never to put my car on grass, and I've not done that!! I just used it to frame and distract the picture a bit, honest guv!! Leaves or tree brambles would have been better, but I liked the contrasting colours. Point well and truly taken, though

One thing I do agree with, and I think everyone has said it, is that those shots for some reason just "didn't work"...I even said it myself in the first post. I'm glad I'm thinking along the right lines, that's for sure; just have to go and take the right pictures now hehe

Cheers one and all
Tony

graham@edinburgh

26,553 posts

255 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all
I meant to add that there's a hint of something in the first one. The shutter distracts as mentioned though. I like the floor level and angle onto the car.

TonyHetherington

Original Poster:

32,091 posts

280 months

Tuesday 9th January 2007
quotequote all


As Emma mentioned that your eye goes to the lightest part of the shot - what if it was darkened? (my photoshop skills won't allow me to get rid of it!)