spot the difference - possible copyright breach
Discussion
The reflections on the bonnet are the same, the rivets on the sheeting above and below the wing mirror are in the same place and the shape of the light through the windscreens is the same. The only differences are the colour and the lack of numbr plate.
It's definitely the same car and the same pic but just recoloured imo.
I think you should have a polite word with them
It's definitely the same car and the same pic but just recoloured imo.
I think you should have a polite word with them
i would say that is they are the same shot, did you take a look at the website? there are other shots on there of the car. www.uniqueautomotive.co.uk/
I've just registered for their site so I can view the gallery and there are a whole load of shots of that Civic in front of that building but it appears to be yellow in them all.
Seems they did a shoot for Fast and Modified (which I'm taking to be a magazine).
There is no shot in the gallery that corresponds with your shot though Poah. I think they nicked it.
Seems they did a shoot for Fast and Modified (which I'm taking to be a magazine).
There is no shot in the gallery that corresponds with your shot though Poah. I think they nicked it.
I'm enjoying playing detective here!
Here is a shot from their gallery of the F&M shoot:
The car is different from in your shot. The no. plate has moved and the writing on the screen is different and it is yellow. So this shot was not taken on the same day as your shoot. Makes a stronger case for your image having been robbed to me.
Here is a shot from their gallery of the F&M shoot:
The car is different from in your shot. The no. plate has moved and the writing on the screen is different and it is yellow. So this shot was not taken on the same day as your shoot. Makes a stronger case for your image having been robbed to me.
There is quite a bit of sftware on the net that will allow you to put copyright information into a picture. You can't see the data visually, but the whole picture is infinitesimally altered in a very ordered manner.
If one were to take such an image, and simply change the colours, the information would remain. It's only buy cutting the original image into small small pieces, or doing a significant reduction in picture quality that the copyright information is removed.
On the other hand I think it's going to be quite hard to persue this myself. People copy icons whenever, and no-one seems to mind.
If one were to take such an image, and simply change the colours, the information would remain. It's only buy cutting the original image into small small pieces, or doing a significant reduction in picture quality that the copyright information is removed.
On the other hand I think it's going to be quite hard to persue this myself. People copy icons whenever, and no-one seems to mind.
Andy M said:
I think it's the same shot, even the tax disk has changed colour.
Good luck!
Good luck!

You're right. The writing on the bonnet is different too. On Poah's shot and the suspect shot, the word begins with an A (or a triangular motif that looks like a stylised A), whereas on the 'photoshoot' pic posted by matthew h, the word starts with a U.
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




