couple of pics of an Exige

[poah]

Spent 90 mins with this beast tonight

Edited by poah on Sunday 15th October 02:30

[sstein]

Those are fab!

Especially like 1 & 2, How do you get the effect on picture1?

-

Stuart

[poah]

sstein said:

Those are fab!

Especially like 1 & 2, How do you get the effect on picture1?

-

Stuart

used my 10-22 @10mm to get the distortion

[CVP]

Number 4 for me - nicely executed

Chris

[UKBob]

Very nice, as usual. I particularly like the first and last photos. Why on earth arnt you uploading them to shutterstock, along with your other nice pieces of automotive work?

[lightningghost]

I wish the wing mirrors were nicer.

[poah]

UKBob said:

Very nice, as usual. I particularly like the first and last photos. Why on earth arnt you uploading them to shutterstock, along with your other nice pieces of automotive work?

I probably will do. just not had time to do it yet

[UKBob]

poah said:

UKBob said:

Very nice, as usual. I particularly like the first and last photos. Why on earth arnt you uploading them to shutterstock, along with your other nice pieces of automotive work?

I probably will do. just not had time to do it yet

Car pics sell very well - just remember to submit as editorial

[poah]

stop teaching your gran to suck eggs please bob

[UKBob]

poah said:

stop teaching your gran to suck eggs please bob

tw@

[poah]

how rude bob

[UKBob]

poah said:

how rude bob

My thoughts precisely, after trying to offer a helpful comment.

[poah]

UKBob said:

poah said:

how rude bob

My thoughts precisely, after trying to offer a helpful comment.

you forget I'm an old hand at this stock lark though Bob

[lightningghost]

Am I the only one reading this dialogue and seeing it being played as an episode of Weebl and Bob?

[poah]

who am I?

[UKBob]

poah said:

UKBob said:

poah said:

how rude bob

My thoughts precisely, after trying to offer a helpful comment.

you forget I'm an old hand at this stock lark though Bob

Keep at it. You might mellow before retirement age, or catch up with my sales by the turn of the centuary

lightningghost said:

Am I the only one reading this dialogue and seeing it being played as an episode of Weebl and Bob?

Mmmm pie!

[poah]

nah I'll forget about photography when I become a career scientist

[bernie_eccle]

Good stuff Poah. Saw them earlier on SE2.

Stewart

[oldred_v8s]

UKBob said:

poah said:

UKBob said:

Very nice, as usual. I particularly like the first and last photos. Why on earth arnt you uploading them to shutterstock, along with your other nice pieces of automotive work?

I probably will do. just not had time to do it yet

Car pics sell very well - just remember to submit as editorial

Bob, please explain for those of us that are interested in uploading but have not yet done so.

Cheers,
Paul

[UKBob]

oldred_v8s said:

UKBob said:

poah said:

UKBob said:

Very nice, as usual. I particularly like the first and last photos. Why on earth arnt you uploading them to shutterstock, along with your other nice pieces of automotive work?

I probably will do. just not had time to do it yet

Car pics sell very well - just remember to submit as editorial

Bob, please explain for those of us that are interested in uploading but have not yet done so.

Cheers,
Paul

As a stock photographer, I take a pic of a refreshing bottle of nice cold ice cold coca cola. Closeup, macro. I upload to Shutterstock. Shutterstock sells the photo to "Joe Advertising Inc" Joe uses the photo to promote his company by plastering it on billboards across america.

Coke then sue Joe for using their copyrighted brandname (without payment or permission) for promoting his business. Joe looses, pays up XX million. Joe then sues shutterstock for his loss plus legal expenses.

Whether shutterstock come after me or not I dont know. They train their reviewers not to accept photos with brand names, logos, trademarks, company names, etc.

How does a newspaper get away with running hundreds of photos each day, of copyrighted things like ipods, coca cola bottles, etc? Simply because the photos are not promoting anything, for they are being used ad "editorial"

Shutterstock is one of the sites which lets users submit pics as "editorial" Thats my understanding of how it works.

Petrolhead story: (long time since I heard it, its accurate, I think!?!)...
In ferris buellers day off, a ferrari 250 GT California was used. The car was a replica. The company shooting the film made the mistake of putting the ferrari badge on the car without their permission. Because the car was a fake, and brand association was sought without permission... I think ferrari sued and destroyed the company who shot the film (cant remember). Im sure someone will correct me if Im wrong

Colours can be copywrited through association. In england, a chocolate bar was taken off shelves, because cadburys insisted the purple wrapper infringed upon their "purple wrapper/chocolate treat" brand and image that they had built up. The shape of a coca cola bottle is even copyrighted, as are many fragrences, and designs like ipods, TVR's, etc.