Compact Camera w/ fast glass

Compact Camera w/ fast glass

Author
Discussion

RichTT

Original Poster:

3,146 posts

177 months

Sunday 6th March 2022
quotequote all
Afternoon everyone.

I currently find myself camera-less. I sold off my old Fuji X-PRO 1 and X100 last year as I was upgrading my motorbike and wasn't using the cameras that much. However I'm missing having a dedicated camera of decent quality.

I shot primarily with 2 x prime lenses one the X-PRO 1, a 35mm and 50mm equivalent and didn't need anything more. The newest Fujifilm X100V is the wrong side of 4 figures and that's if you can find it in stock. I spent some time looking at the reviews for the Leica D-LUX 7 which is just about palatable. But it seems that the Panasonic LUMIX DC-LX100 is a very similar proposition.

Currently looking at:

Panasonic LUMIX DC-LX100 II
Canon PowerShot G5 X Mark II

(At a push) Leica D-LUX 7

Any advice welcome.

Cheers

Gweeds

7,954 posts

58 months

Sunday 6th March 2022
quotequote all

RichTT

Original Poster:

3,146 posts

177 months

Sunday 6th March 2022
quotequote all
How much of an upgrade from the original X100 was the X100F? I found the original fine but the autofocus was terribly slow at times.

GravelBen

15,839 posts

236 months

Sunday 6th March 2022
quotequote all
I quite like the idea of the Fuji XF10, very compact size with a nice APSC sensor and 18.5mm f2.8 lens. Haven't used one to know what they're like in practice though.

tog

4,600 posts

234 months

Monday 7th March 2022
quotequote all
I use an EOS M100 (NLA, now replaced in the range by the M200) with a 22mm f2 lens and am very pleased with it. Simple, quite small, cheaper than most posh compacts, and decent quality images.

sgrimshaw

7,388 posts

256 months

Monday 7th March 2022
quotequote all
Have you considered the Sony RX100 ?


David_M

407 posts

56 months

Monday 7th March 2022
quotequote all
tog said:
I use an EOS M100 (NLA, now replaced in the range by the M200) with a 22mm f2 lens and am very pleased with it. Simple, quite small, cheaper than most posh compacts, and decent quality images.
Similarly - I have a Panasonic GX7 with 20mm f1.7 attached for this (plus other lenses when I want them)

RichTT

Original Poster:

3,146 posts

177 months

Monday 7th March 2022
quotequote all
sgrimshaw said:
Have you considered the Sony RX100 ?
I have considered getting a proper compact, but I really do like the quick access of the dials on top of the camera and round the lens ring for quick setting.

I tend to shoot using an EVF and manually adjusting settings as I go.

anonymous-user

60 months

Monday 7th March 2022
quotequote all
I have a fetish for decent quality compact cameras as I find that I take far more photos with compact/pocket cameras, than I do with larger cameras. Last year I had about £6000 worth of Sony full frame A7III bodies and various lenses. Sold it all, and bought:

Ricoh GRIII

£799, 28mm f2.8 fixed lens, and 24MP. 3 axis optical stabilisation etc.

I absolutely love it. The quality of the images is incredible for the size of the camera. I find the 28mm focal length to be perfect for travel, scenery, street photography, family etc.

https://www.ricoh-imaging.co.jp/english/products/g...

They also make a 40mm focal length version as well as the 28mm.

I have owned various compact cameras including several versions of the RX100 and RX1, and the Ricoh is by far the best I have had, for my needs anyway.

If you need zoom, then clearly the Ricoh won't be much use, but having gone from an RX100 (24-70mm) to a fixed 28mm, I have found myself never needing zoom, and it has actually improved my photography.

What I will also say is that size was really important for me, and if a camera doesn't easily fit in my jacket pocket, then I might as well have something bigger with interchangeable lenses... but then I just end up leaving it at home. But if it's as small as a Ricoh or RX100 then I really do use it a lot more.



Edited by anonymous-user on Monday 7th March 16:03

DavidY

4,469 posts

290 months

Monday 7th March 2022
quotequote all
RichTT said:
How much of an upgrade from the original X100 was the X100F? I found the original fine but the autofocus was terribly slow at times.
I have both! The X100F is much faster (AF) and the joystick makes moving the focus point a doddle. The X-Trans III sensor is also inherently sharper though the lens stiff suffers from softness wide-open on close focused subjects. Overall I think the X100F is a fine camera, but there is something about the colour rendition of the original X100 (Bayer Sensor) has the upper hand. That said I use the X100F a lot, and its my goto lightweight camera solution.

Incidently the X100V can be had for under 4 figures from the Fuji Refurb store (also out of stock at the moment) https://shop.fujifilm.co.uk/fujifilm-x100v-refurbi...

RichTT

Original Poster:

3,146 posts

177 months

Tuesday 8th March 2022
quotequote all
Interesting on the sensor. I loved everything about the original X100 and the in camera jpeg processing meant I very rarely ever edited off camera.

I'll set up an alert for the refurb fuji site and see if it pops up before i make a decision.

Craikeybaby

10,631 posts

231 months

Thursday 24th March 2022
quotequote all
The X100V does seem to be one of the bigger jumps in the X100 line - it is the first with the new lens. I also have an alert set up on the Fuji refurb store...