Mainly video 5d mk3 or a6300???

[torqueofthedevil]

Any experience of both here?

I’m not as clued up as my business partner but I now the basics. Used a borrowed 5d mk2 for predominantly video and I found it very intuitive and my partner had only ever used canon.

The mk3 is rated highly and even number 1 for dslr video in some reviews but the concensus seems to be that if you are predominantly shooting video then the Sony is the better option.

It has 4k and superior auto focus but I think it has more issues and is less intuitive and harder to use.

I keep thinking I’m set on the canon until I go to YouTube or Instagram and all the best videos seem to be on the a6300!

Thanks

[singlecoil]

The 5d Mk2/3/4 is full frame and the Sony is crop, but I don't know if the Canon is full frame on video. Might be worth looking into as it could well affect your lens choices.

[torqueofthedevil]

The canon video works with full frame lenses.

There are still plenty of lens choices for the a6300 even though it’s a cropped sensor and we don’t really own any lenses yet so no issues.

Yes it’s be nice to have the Sony full frame but watching videos online it doesn’t seem to compromise quality at all

[singlecoil]

torqueofthedevil said:

The canon video works with full frame lenses...

Indeed but that wasn't what I was getting at. AIUI not all FF cameras use the whole sensor when recording video, they are in video mode crop sensors anyway. Your choice should take into account what sort of videos you are making and whether the FF advantage is worthwhile to you or not.

[Gandahar]

what is the original poster wanting to do?

More details needed to give advice

[torqueofthedevil]

Gandahar said:

what is the original poster wanting to do?

More details needed to give advice

We are wanting to produce short promotional videos, generally featuring landscapes etc. Some internal video in buildings etc and to a lesser extent, photos of the above as well. These will generally be played on websites and social media.

Thanks

[Bacardi]

Have you considered hiring a professional? Someone with the knowledge, all the gear, experience, to make your company look professional for your clients?

Most probably cheaper than buying stuff you think you need, to end up with a crap home movie....

[Simpo Two]

Wot he said. The quality of your gear will be the least of your worries. For starters, what about the audio, eg mics, voice-over/presenter? For seconds, what about lighting? Good microphones and lights will cost more than the camera. Amateur film-makers NEVER think about sound or lighting!

And 4K for social media/websites?

[Phunk]

Simpo Two said:

Wot he said. The quality of your gear will be the least of your worries. For starters, what about the audio, eg mics, voice-over/presenter? For seconds, what about lighting? Good microphones and lights will cost more than the camera. Amateur film-makers NEVER think about sound or lighting!

And 4K for social media/websites?

+1

I'd perhaps experiment with your phone or similar first to see what you produce and what you need?

When creating video for business, I'd first off look at this:

https://wistia.com/blog/video-collaboration-worksh...

I'm speak to a local videographer who specialises In corporate video to start off with, shoot a few videos with him/her and see what works, then look at investing in your own kit.

If you are looking to go it alone, then at least find a video marketing consultant (like me :P) to guide you through.

To answer your initial question, both cameras have different advantages.

A6300:

Positive:
Cheap
Good autofocus
4K Video (100% not required for Social or websites, but can be useful for reframing interviews)

Negative:

It doesn't have a microphone input, so any sound you are looking to capture will require an external recorder. However, if you are pretty creative you can do without audio, especially as 70-90% of videos on social are viewed without sound.
Small sensor won't give you as shallow depth of field, but sometimes that can be an advantage.


Canon 5Diii

Positive:
Mic input
Full frame, giving awesome depth of field
Primarily a stills camera, so can get some great stills.
With a hack you can shoot super high quality 14-bit RAW video

Negative

It's getting on a bit!
No video auto focus
No log recording

---

There's plenty to think about when a business starts creating video for itself. Feel free to ask away on here or by PM and I'll be happy to advise.

Also have a read of: https://wistia.com/blog/hiring-in-house-contractor

[Simpo Two]

Phunk said:

I'm speak to a local videographer who specialises In corporate video to start off with, shoot a few videos with him/her and see what works, then look at investing in your own kit.

'Hi local corporate videographer, I don't want to employ you, but can I just come along on some of your pro shoots to hang about and get in the way so I can see how you do it, then go off and get my own kit so I don't have to hire you?'


No way would I have wannabees hanging around on any of my shoots, still less those wanting to pick my brains so they can deprive me of business!

[Phunk]

Simpo Two said:

Phunk said:

I'm speak to a local videographer who specialises In corporate video to start off with, shoot a few videos with him/her and see what works, then look at investing in your own kit.

'Hi local corporate videographer, I don't want to employ you, but can I just come along on some of your pro shoots to hang about and get in the way so I can see how you do it, then go off and get my own kit so I don't have to hire you?'


No way would I have wannabees hanging around on any of my shoots, still less those wanting to pick my brains so they can deprive me of business!

Sorry, that came across incorrectly, when I said speak to, I meant hire.