Stuffed anteater or not?

Author
Discussion

saaby93

Original Poster:

32,038 posts

184 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-4391...
It doesnt look like the same anteater

shortar53

548 posts

279 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
30s exposure... the anteater is way too sharp to have 'wandered' into shot

saaby93

Original Poster:

32,038 posts

184 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
shortar53 said:
30s exposure... the anteater is way too sharp to have 'wandered' into shot
The grass too?

karma mechanic

773 posts

128 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
It is a flash plus time exposure.

It looks very much like the stuffed one, mostly when you consider that he could have borrowed the stuffed one, placed it there and ruffled the fur a bit. For me it is the pose rather than the markings that make it look the same.

However, if you do an image search for anteaters you'll see plenty that look similar...

I guess somebody needs to find the non-stuffed one that looks like that.

Simpo Two

86,719 posts

271 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
shortar53 said:
30s exposure... the anteater is way too sharp to have 'wandered' into shot
The theory is that motion would have been frozen by the flash.

I don't know how fast anteaters move but over 30 secs I'd expect to see some ghosting from the anteater and light trails from the beetles, so I'm leaning towards fake.

saaby93

Original Poster:

32,038 posts

184 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
shortar53 said:
30s exposure... the anteater is way too sharp to have 'wandered' into shot
The theory is that motion would have been frozen by the flash.

I don't know how fast anteaters move but over 30 secs I'd expect to see some ghosting from the anteater and light trails from the beetles, so I'm leaning towards fake.
Isn't it that everything's dark except for those glow things
The anteater and the grass etc get captured by the flash
At least theyve agreed it wasnt photoshopped

toohuge

3,449 posts

222 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
shortar53 said:
30s exposure... the anteater is way too sharp to have 'wandered' into shot
The theory is that motion would have been frozen by the flash.

I don't know how fast anteaters move but over 30 secs I'd expect to see some ghosting from the anteater and light trails from the beetles, so I'm leaning towards fake.
i agree - I went to the exhibition in Edinburgh and was confused at how the anteater managed to come into the scene and leave the scene in such a clean manner, especially given the shutter speed.

Simpo Two

86,719 posts

271 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
If he was using flash it's odd that the right foreground is dark... perhaps two or more shots shopped together...

saaby93

Original Poster:

32,038 posts

184 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
If he was using flash it's odd that the right foreground is dark... perhaps two or more shots shopped together...
If you look at the sky its a very dark night to get the stars showing like that
The ground and the anteater is going to be very dark - you can see how dark middle right in the shadow
The flash has lit up the anteater (and the grass) before it scarpers
It may well be a real one smile

Simpo Two

86,719 posts

271 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
So why is the flash lighting up the anteater but not the grass which is closer? A curved chunk out of the centre foreground can mean built-in flash + lens hood, but this is missing the front right too. Did he really have time to set up an off-camera flash to the left so it catches Mr Anthony Eater perfectly?

saaby93

Original Poster:

32,038 posts

184 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
So why is the flash lighting up the anteater but not the grass which is closer? A curved chunk out of the centre foreground can mean built-in flash + lens hood, but this is missing the front right too. Did he really have time to set up an off-camera flash to the left so it catches Mr Anthony Eater perfectly?
I assumed it was an off camera flash about double height, left of image pointing at the anthill
yes he would have been waiting for the shot
Assuming it isnt a stuffed hehe
The more I think about, the more I think it is a real one, a clever shot, set up, patience, bingo



Turn7

24,066 posts

227 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Theres an image of the Stuffed Anteater at the entrance to the park on the net, its in exactly the same pose, exactly the same colour....

BlimeyCharlie

922 posts

148 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
I read (see link below) about this earlier - it has been judged to be fake...hardly a shock.

Also, there appears to be more and more of these 'photos' appearing that are a series of photos merged together - that ain't photography!
A photograph isn't an image that uses bits of 4 different photos - a photograph is a single image! These 'photographs' all look the same, over-produced, boring, false and the 'photographer' is more interested in the equipment used and telling us all about it.

Soon be Christmas.

https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2018/apr/...



Simpo Two

86,719 posts

271 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
I assumed it was an off camera flash about double height, left of image pointing at the anthill
yes he would have been waiting for the shot
Assuming it isnt a stuffed hehe
The more I think about, the more I think it is a real one, a clever shot, set up, patience, bingo
Lucky Mr Eater didn't come in from the right then!

I think said beast was in position when the lighting was set up. It's a Norwegian Blue Anteater, pining for the fiords.

BlimeyCharlie

922 posts

148 months

Friday 27th April 2018
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
saaby93 said:
I assumed it was an off camera flash about double height, left of image pointing at the anthill
yes he would have been waiting for the shot
Assuming it isnt a stuffed hehe
The more I think about, the more I think it is a real one, a clever shot, set up, patience, bingo
Lucky Mr Eater didn't come in from the right then!

I think said beast was in position when the lighting was set up. It's a Norwegian Blue Anteater, pining for the fiords.
A genuine replica. The photographer camped there for 16 years, waiting for that single shot. Johnny Kingdom helped too.
My mate once photographed the Black Panther, but when the postman crossed the county line, on his way to Truprint, the x-ray equipment fogged the film.

K12beano

20,854 posts

281 months

Sunday 29th April 2018
quotequote all
saaby93 said:
I assumed it was an off camera flash about double height, left of image pointing at the anthill
yes he would have been waiting for the shot
Assuming it isnt a stuffed hehe
The more I think about, the more I think it is a real one, a clever shot, set up, patience, bingo
This is no time to get technical!






hehe


Do we care - one day an Oran-utang will take a better picture than Uncle Steve Carter and we'll all be toast!!!?

Moonhawk

10,730 posts

225 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2018
quotequote all
shortar53 said:
30s exposure... the anteater is way too sharp to have 'wandered' into shot
Google second curtain sync.

WWA

121 posts

111 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2018
quotequote all
It would still have been a cracking image without the anteater, stuffed or not.

jimmy156

3,698 posts

193 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2018
quotequote all


This the taxidermy anteater.

A pretty obvious and brazen cheat IMO!

sgrimshaw

7,389 posts

256 months

Wednesday 2nd May 2018
quotequote all
That is an ex-anteater!