Its irritating me....
Author
Discussion

Upatdawn

Original Poster:

2,202 posts

177 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
My Finepicx HS30EXR is a "bridge" camera which (i think) means i am looking at a lcd image even through the viewfinder?

what Nikon/Canon DSLR cameras are actual prism SLR where i see the actual image in my eyepiece?


DIW35

4,204 posts

229 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
All of them. Off the top of my head I can't think of any Canon or Nikon DSLRs that use an EVF (Electronic View Finder)

MysteryLemon

4,968 posts

220 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
Upatdawn said:
My Finepicx HS30EXR is a "bridge" camera which (i think) means i am looking at a lcd image even through the viewfinder?

what Nikon/Canon DSLR cameras are actual prism SLR where i see the actual image in my eyepiece?
The vast majority of DSLR cameras have an optical view finder. It's only these newer micro/compact system things that dont as they do away with the mirror. One of the many reasons I will never own one.

LocoBlade

7,653 posts

285 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
MysteryLemon said:
The vast majority of DSLR cameras have an optical view finder. It's only these newer micro/compact system things that dont as they do away with the mirror. One of the many reasons I will never own one.
Most Sony "DSLRs" have an EVF with no mirror

MysteryLemon

4,968 posts

220 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
LocoBlade said:
Most Sony "DSLRs" have an EVF with no mirror
I wont ever buy one of them either then biggrin .. Their older ones have proper view finders though, the Axxx's.

LocoBlade

7,653 posts

285 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
Me neither, I tried my uncle's SLT A37 and didnt get on with the EVF at all, it was very laggy and jerky when panning, not very clear to judge focussing and the colour reproduction was really washed out.

onomatopoeia

3,526 posts

246 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
LocoBlade said:
MysteryLemon said:
The vast majority of DSLR cameras have an optical view finder. It's only these newer micro/compact system things that dont as they do away with the mirror. One of the many reasons I will never own one.
Most Sony "DSLRs" have an EVF with no mirror
But not my a900 or a700

The EVFs on the new DSLTs divide opinions. Those on the higher end models have in fact been rather well received, those on the basic models are less well thought of (the A3x range mentioned on this topic are the entry level).


K12beano

20,854 posts

304 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
Of the Nikons, some of the viewfinders show less than 100% of the view. Bit pointless - especially in this digital age! But some of the pentaprisms also foul (or fowl as I managed to put it t'other day) the workings of a TS lens (luckily I don't use them - work of the devil!)

None of the Nikon viewfinders are brilliant when it comes to manual focussing - although a few have interchangeable focussing screens, none of the standard screens are anything like as good as "old-school" fresnel and split screens.

Some models (certainly my old D2X and my current D800) allow for replacing the eyepiece with a DK17M to give a slightly magnified view, which helps (as does an eyecup (DK-19 IIRC))

Ironically, when working on a tripod, I find the EVF useful for manual focus, especially for Macro and at low angles - but it IS an annoyingly slow option, and a good viewfinder with the right information is a godsend!


Don't know if Canonites suffer as badly as Nikon make us do!?!

Upatdawn

Original Poster:

2,202 posts

177 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
next question

Nikon/Canon, as i understand it one has cheaper lens with more availability as the lens has the AF motor, which is it?

and i dont like small cameras, my hands are too big, id LIKE something like a "pro"? D3 or DX (i think thats right) or a canon but they have a 5 and 6 series at almost the same price (£450-£650)


marctwo

3,666 posts

289 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
Upatdawn said:
My Finepicx HS30EXR is a "bridge" camera which (i think) means i am looking at a lcd image even through the viewfinder?

what Nikon/Canon DSLR cameras are actual prism SLR where i see the actual image in my eyepiece?
Bridge simply means that it's conceptually in between a compact camera and a full SLR. I don't think it really has any bearing on the viewfinder.

Good EVFs are very good these days and the WYSIWYG view is very useful. Bad ones however are terrible.

Simpo Two

92,708 posts

294 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
Upatdawn said:
Nikon/Canon, as i understand it one has cheaper lens with more availability as the lens has the AF motor, which is it?
Entry level Nikon bodies don't have a focus motor. This means that for autofocus you need a lens designated 'AF-S' (in reality this is of little concern as most Nikon lenses are AF-S now)

Upatdawn said:
and i dont like small cameras, my hands are too big, id LIKE something like a "pro"? D3 or DX (i think thats right) or a canon but they have a 5 and 6 series at almost the same price (£450-£650)
Bricks are expensive, but one option if you don't need 'pro' performance is to buy a lesser body and add a grip underneath.


marctwo said:
Bridge simply means that it's conceptually in between a compact camera and a full SLR. I don't think it really has any bearing on the viewfinder.
AFAIK bridge cameras don't have a pentaprism so can't have an optical VF, merely a telly that takes a feed from the sensor. I think. Many makers of bridge cameras add a lump on top to make them *look* like a DSLR, but don't be fooled.

Xaero

4,063 posts

244 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
I wouldn't compare a cheap Fujifilm bridge camera EVF to a high end Sony or Olympus EVF, they are miles ahead in terms of clarity and are only going to improve in the future too. Optical viewfinders on the other hand are unlikely to improve anymore as it's not needed.

marctwo

3,666 posts

289 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
marctwo said:
Bridge simply means that it's conceptually in between a compact camera and a full SLR. I don't think it really has any bearing on the viewfinder.
AFAIK bridge cameras don't have a pentaprism so can't have an optical VF, merely a telly that takes a feed from the sensor. I think. Many makers of bridge cameras add a lump on top to make them *look* like a DSLR, but don't be fooled.
I guess what I meant was that the term 'bridge camera' is not used to refer to a camera with an EVF. My Olympus has an EVF but is not a bridge camera. Likewise you could have a bridge camera with an OVF that wasn't an SLR.

extraT

1,876 posts

179 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
  • Thread highjack*
Upatdawn said:
My Finepicx HS30EXR is a "bridge" camera ....
I'm glad I popped into this thread as I am thinking of getting the HS30EXR...what do you think of it?

Im quite happy with the sample pictures I have seen so far, but I am after the opinon of someone who owns one! What are the quality of the pictures like?

Bearing in mind all I would photograph is scenery and the baby, what do you think??





binliner

262 posts

250 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
MysteryLemon said:
The vast majority of DSLR cameras have an optical view finder. It's only these newer micro/compact system things that dont as they do away with the mirror. One of the many reasons I will never own one.
If you tried one of the high end compact system things like the Olympus OM-D or Fuji X series you might change your mind about EVFs and start to wonder if you really need a DSLR wink

Upatdawn

Original Poster:

2,202 posts

177 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
extraT said:
I'm glad I popped into this thread as I am thinking of getting the HS30EXR...what do you think of it?

Im quite happy with the sample pictures I have seen so far, but I am after the opinon of someone who owns one! What are the quality of the pictures like?

Bearing in mind all I would photograph is scenery and the baby, what do you think??
mmmmmmm

well I had a S9500 before, its LCD screen was smaller but i found (for me) the thing worked better, maybe im just being a bit "i want a nikon"....

my "baby's" dont always sit still....

im more bill bailey than david bailey - more constipation than composition
















Edited by Upatdawn on Wednesday 14th November 18:50

extraT

1,876 posts

179 months

Wednesday 14th November 2012
quotequote all
Thank you so much for taking the time to reply with those beautiful pics!

Your cat does not look amused!

But I think you have sold me on the camera- perfect for my needs! Thanks!

Upatdawn

Original Poster:

2,202 posts

177 months

Thursday 15th November 2012
quotequote all
Its fine in most respects, you dont need to carry extra lenses, its got 24-750mm (they say) onboard, takes fair movies, and a wide variety of settings

wanna buy mine? lol

extraT

1,876 posts

179 months

Saturday 17th November 2012
quotequote all
Upatdawn said:
Its fine in most respects, you dont need to carry extra lenses, its got 24-750mm (they say) onboard, takes fair movies, and a wide variety of settings

wanna buy mine? lol
Thanks, but I no longer live in the UK!