Canon announce 5d Mk3
Author
Discussion

theboyfold

Original Poster:

11,469 posts

255 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
Is anybody here tempted? I've been waiting to upgrade my Mk1 for this camera but might see what happens to the used prices of the Mk2

http://www.engadget.com/2012/03/02/canon-announces...

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
Looking through the sample images now.

For me the IQ has to be somewhere around fantastic at 22mp and low ISO vs the D800.

Pricing wise its going to be expensive. £2999 launch price, probably $5500 NZD.

Thats a 5D2 and 24tse instead.

S47

1,356 posts

209 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
About time thumbup

tim-b

1,279 posts

239 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
theboyfold said:
...I've been waiting to upgrade my Mk1 for this camera but might see what happens to the used prices of the Mk2
I've been waiting a few months for this to come out, in anticipation it will mean a healthy drop in price for the MKII.....here's hoping! Canon rumours gives the 4th (Sunday) as the day for a price drop, but no info on how much it will go down.

davidd

6,713 posts

313 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
I've been waiting for this, I'll give it a few months and see what happens to prices of this and also the mk2.


markmullen

15,877 posts

263 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
As much as I like the sound of this I think my next camera is going to be medium format with a Phase One back.

toppstuff

13,698 posts

276 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
Got to say I am not that impressed with the spec.

And it is SO expensive. The new lenses from Canon such as the latest 24-70 are also a lot more money.

The Canon is set to be a LOT more expensive than a Nikon D800. And the Nikon seems to have better features all round such as two different crop modes, more resolution, better video, USB 3, cheaper lenses in some cases and the option of the D800e for ultra detail. And the D800 is 20-25% less.

I loved my 5D2, and I will reserve judgement until the 5D3 is out and the price has hopefully settled, but so far it does not light my fire.

MartinP

1,275 posts

267 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
Not sure that I believe the review in that link when it says this isn't a replacement for the 5D mk ii but is supposed to sit between that and the 1D X. Not really enough difference between the mk ii and mk iii for that surely.

Glad to see they haven't gone for a big step up in mega pixels, the 21 from the 5d mk ii are plenty for my needs. I'm hoping it will have improved noise performance at very high ISOs and improved auto focus in low light on all focus points. Those two points would make it a winner for me. That said, I'm not at a point where I'd even think about upgrading my 5D Mk IIs yet.

londonagent

635 posts

197 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
Hopefully a drop in price of the mkII means I can finally justify getting one. biggrin

Xaero

4,063 posts

244 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
Not that I can afford it, but I was quite surprised by how lacking the spec sheet was. I was expecting a lot more focus on video such as an articulated screen and even 4k video. I'm sure it focuses fast, but 6fps? Canon can do better.

I reckon their competitors must be breathing a sigh of relief, least of all Nikon.

14-7

6,233 posts

220 months

Friday 2nd March 2012
quotequote all
As a Canonite I have to say (like others) I'm disappointed by not only the spec but the ridiculous pricing of the Mk3.

Far too expensive, not enough features to make it that attractive as far as I'm concerned.

I will look forward to Mk2 prices dropping slightly though (hopefully!).

DIW35

4,204 posts

229 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
There's not enough there to convince me to trade in my 5DII for one. Once it's been out for a while, the price has stabilised, and reviews have gone past the 'it's shiney and new so we ought to write something nice' stage, I might look at it again with a view to upgrading. Until then I am more than happy with what I have.

tinman0

18,231 posts

269 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
Yup, gonna watch 5d2 prices myself now!

theboyfold

Original Poster:

11,469 posts

255 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
Looking at the specs it does feel like a small upgrade on what went before. I guess specs only tell part of the story, the rest is told when you come to use the thing.

Saying that though, I think there will be lots of MkII cameras changing hands over the next few months...

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
I hope so! biggrin

If you gave me a choice, without the tiresome problem of cost, I would go for a 5d3.

Give me a choice of a 5d3 or 5d2 and 24tse (or 24-70mkII, or 16-35mkII etc) I think I know which way I will jump.

Cheib

25,366 posts

204 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
The tests between this and the D800 will be fascinating....seems like Canon have caught Nikon up on AF and maybe high ISO and Nikon have maybe got a more flexible camera as it can also be a 16MP DX camera and also shoot in FX RAW at different resolutions.

Will be fascinating.....

Canon's pricing does seem very punchy....mind the new 24-70 at comfortably north of £2000 really is even more punchy!

theboyfold

Original Poster:

11,469 posts

255 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
Cheib said:
Canon's pricing does seem very punchy....mind the new 24-70 at comfortably north of £2000 really is even more punchy!
I'd agree with that, the new 24-70mm does seem very very steep indeed!

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
I think the RRP for the new 24-70 is only $100-200 more than the old one.

theboyfold

Original Poster:

11,469 posts

255 months

Saturday 3rd March 2012
quotequote all
Ok, I never knew that. I never buy lenses new anyway, so to me it's RRP is around £750! hehe

Cheib

25,366 posts

204 months

Sunday 4th March 2012
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
I think the RRP for the new 24-70 is only $100-200 more than the old one.
According to Canon the RRP of the old one is £1540 and can be bought for under £1000 the new one is £2200 isn't it ?!?! That's bloody punchy!