EOS 500 deal on bay or save for 600d
Discussion
Decided its time to get a real camera
I was looking to save a bit more and get myself a EOS 600d, but I've just seen this deal on ebay
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Canon-EOS-1000D-18-55-75...
So is it worth waiting and getting the 600 , this is less than a 1/3 of the price it would cost for the same 600D kit ,but would I regret not getting the newer better spec 600
Take into account the only camera I've ever previously used is a Canon Ixus
I was looking to save a bit more and get myself a EOS 600d, but I've just seen this deal on ebay
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Canon-EOS-1000D-18-55-75...
So is it worth waiting and getting the 600 , this is less than a 1/3 of the price it would cost for the same 600D kit ,but would I regret not getting the newer better spec 600
Take into account the only camera I've ever previously used is a Canon Ixus
djt100 said:
The Fold out screen is why i was looking at the 600d, but the price on the 500 is very temping especially as it will be my first real camera, but will i regret not waiting .....
Certainly if you are planning to use the video facility an articulated screen is well worth having.In a 'studio' sort of environment and especially using Live View it also offers advantages. Similar with macro shots even in the 'wild'.
'Over a crowd' shots too. Or very low level quick takes without actually having to lie on the ground. In fact you can get lower than you could holding a camera to the eye whilst lying on the ground.
If any of these situations are useful in your areas fo interest then I think you might find the articulated screen rather useful. If not, go with the less expensive solution if it gives you all that you need.
Edited by LongQ on Saturday 4th February 11:46
Get the specifications side by side and find the diffeences. How much in the next year are you likely to need them? Remember that you can shoot low level macro by bending down etc.
As a first SLR either will be fine but you will hvae a very steep learning curver understanding the 3 way management of exposure controls, composition, how your autofucus is working etc and either camera body will allow you to do this. Stay clear of the 1000D as there is too much automation to get in the way of learning.
When you have more to spend then buy glass not a body upgrade.
As a first SLR either will be fine but you will hvae a very steep learning curver understanding the 3 way management of exposure controls, composition, how your autofucus is working etc and either camera body will allow you to do this. Stay clear of the 1000D as there is too much automation to get in the way of learning.
When you have more to spend then buy glass not a body upgrade.
hazzel_frazzel said:
Have just gone through the same, and decided that the 270 odd quid saved on going for the 500d was quite a few decent lenses. As said though, if the screen is something you are likely to use a lot, then that might be the better option despite the higher price.
Unfortunately the £270 is only a proportion of one truly decent lens, but the same logic applies. In reality, any of the most recent DSLRs can produce great images. You will notice much more difference in image quality between a cheap lens and a decent one, than between different cameras.Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


