Discussion
Had anyone actually tried one and can offer an informed unbiased opinion?
I know it's a manual lens and a budget lens but at two hundred rubs it is a quarter of the price of the canon 10-22 that I was considering. The intention is to try some creative outdoor nightime landscape type stuff so i'm only really interested in the ultra wide end of the lens, and I do mena try, I might decide I'm s
t at it.
Podie, I've already heard your Roll Royce/Sinclair C5 Metaphor so you don't count
I know it's a manual lens and a budget lens but at two hundred rubs it is a quarter of the price of the canon 10-22 that I was considering. The intention is to try some creative outdoor nightime landscape type stuff so i'm only really interested in the ultra wide end of the lens, and I do mena try, I might decide I'm s
t at it.Podie, I've already heard your Roll Royce/Sinclair C5 Metaphor so you don't count

I've not tried the Samyang but I have played with the Canon 8-15mm fisheye which to be honest the novelty soon wore off, at first it was great fun but soon I thought "when would I actually end up using this" and decided that it was really only regularly useable at the 15mm end (on full frame).
If I were you I would still consider the 10-20 or 10-22 as I think you would get more use out of them. I use a 17-40 on full frame and it is perfect, 10mm on a 1.6 crop would be similar.
If I were you I would still consider the 10-20 or 10-22 as I think you would get more use out of them. I use a 17-40 on full frame and it is perfect, 10mm on a 1.6 crop would be similar.
Have you read the review at photozone.de?
I have a the Samyang 14mm which I typically use on an APS-C body and it's very good for the price. In fact I would say it's better than very good so long as you are prepared to use a manual lens. There wasn't an option when I started snapping so it's fine by me.
The Photozone review of the 14mm seems spot on to me, as do their reviews of a couple of the other lenses I own. So I am tempted to trust the site's accuracy, assessment and final conclusions for the lenses they have tested.
Not sure I really need an 8mm, even if it is an untypical fish-eye design, but it would be tempting to play with one.
I think a few people must have done just that and decided they don't want to keep it based on the number to be found on eBay. However since they seem to be selling used for almost what they cost new it's currently not an expensive experiment. In fact it's not even really expensive if you buy, keep and rarely use.
I have a the Samyang 14mm which I typically use on an APS-C body and it's very good for the price. In fact I would say it's better than very good so long as you are prepared to use a manual lens. There wasn't an option when I started snapping so it's fine by me.
The Photozone review of the 14mm seems spot on to me, as do their reviews of a couple of the other lenses I own. So I am tempted to trust the site's accuracy, assessment and final conclusions for the lenses they have tested.
Not sure I really need an 8mm, even if it is an untypical fish-eye design, but it would be tempting to play with one.
I think a few people must have done just that and decided they don't want to keep it based on the number to be found on eBay. However since they seem to be selling used for almost what they cost new it's currently not an expensive experiment. In fact it's not even really expensive if you buy, keep and rarely use.
I have the Samyang 8mm which I use on a crop sensor. Its a very good lens, very sharp so can produce fantastic images. Just be mindful of its use/composition and angles that you shoot at - theres certainly a skill with framing images with the views and distortion they inherently have.
Can't help in terms of the 8mm, but regarding Samyang I have the 85 f/1.4 and love it. It's manual (but I use a lot of old lenses so not a problem), but putting that aside it takes beautifully sharp pictures, with lovely smooth OOF areas. I've got no issues with the build quality - not quite up to some of the old all-metal AI/AIS Nikkors, but then very little is nowadays.
There are quite a few Samyang groups on flickr, probably worth having a look through these to see some example shots too.
There are quite a few Samyang groups on flickr, probably worth having a look through these to see some example shots too.
david_b said:
Can't help in terms of the 8mm, but regarding Samyang I have the 85 f/1.4 and love it. It's manual (but I use a lot of old lenses so not a problem), but putting that aside it takes beautifully sharp pictures, with lovely smooth OOF areas. I've got no issues with the build quality - not quite up to some of the old all-metal AI/AIS Nikkors, but then very little is nowadays.
There are quite a few Samyang groups on flickr, probably worth having a look through these to see some example shots too.
I'll second that. Excellent image quality. There are quite a few Samyang groups on flickr, probably worth having a look through these to see some example shots too.
ian in lancs said:
Wheres that?
Just googled the area and I 'think' its on Lever Street. Its fairly obvious, in fact i just streetmapped it and its called The Real Camera Co. they even have a website www.realcamera.co.uk.Think the owner was into his exotic model shoots, quite a few raunchy pics on the wall

Seany88 said:
Just googled the area and I 'think' its on Lever Street. Its fairly obvious, in fact i just streetmapped it and its called The Real Camera Co. they even have a website www.realcamera.co.uk.
Think the owner was into his exotic model shoots, quite a few raunchy pics on the wall
Might have to have a look in there.Think the owner was into his exotic model shoots, quite a few raunchy pics on the wall

Seany88 said:
ian in lancs said:
Wheres that?
Just googled the area and I 'think' its on Lever Street. Its fairly obvious, in fact i just streetmapped it and its called The Real Camera Co. they even have a website www.realcamera.co.uk.Think the owner was into his exotic model shoots, quite a few raunchy pics on the wall

1a35 said:
david_b said:
Can't help in terms of the 8mm, but regarding Samyang I have the 85 f/1.4 and love it. It's manual (but I use a lot of old lenses so not a problem), but putting that aside it takes beautifully sharp pictures, with lovely smooth OOF areas. I've got no issues with the build quality - not quite up to some of the old all-metal AI/AIS Nikkors, but then very little is nowadays.
There are quite a few Samyang groups on flickr, probably worth having a look through these to see some example shots too.
I'll second that. Excellent image quality. There are quite a few Samyang groups on flickr, probably worth having a look through these to see some example shots too.
). No good for reportage style or anything that involves quickly changing focussing...So what's the Samyang like for this?Seany88 said:
ian in lancs said:
Wheres that?
Just googled the area and I 'think' its on Lever Street. Its fairly obvious, in fact i just streetmapped it and its called The Real Camera Co. they even have a website www.realcamera.co.uk.Think the owner was into his exotic model shoots, quite a few raunchy pics on the wall

tim-b said:
1a35 said:
david_b said:
Can't help in terms of the 8mm, but regarding Samyang I have the 85 f/1.4 and love it. It's manual (but I use a lot of old lenses so not a problem), but putting that aside it takes beautifully sharp pictures, with lovely smooth OOF areas. I've got no issues with the build quality - not quite up to some of the old all-metal AI/AIS Nikkors, but then very little is nowadays.
There are quite a few Samyang groups on flickr, probably worth having a look through these to see some example shots too.
I'll second that. Excellent image quality. There are quite a few Samyang groups on flickr, probably worth having a look through these to see some example shots too.
). No good for reportage style or anything that involves quickly changing focussing...So what's the Samyang like for this?I've not had much chance to use mine all that much yet, but I've got some nice baby portraits from it, plus some shots from Goodwood - having said that, trying to do any "street" style stuff at f/1.4 is always going to be a challenge (well it is for me anyway!), plus impossible when it's sunny without filters... One from the paddock that I liked (this is at f/4):

Goodwood Revival 2011 by david_b, on Flickr
david_b said:
I've not tried the Zeiss to be able to give a direct comparison unfortunately, but I've just grabbed a couple of old Nikkors and the Samyang feels pretty similar to these (105 f/2.5 and 180 f/2.8). It's a bit less than 180deg lock-to-lock as well, if that helps.
Thanks, that sounds good, IIRC I had to change grip 3 or 4 times to go lock-to-lock with the Zeiss....great for getting perfect focussing in a studio or on a tripod, not so good for wandering around the paddock at Goodwood (and it certainly looks sharp from your pic)! So glad to hear it's a 'normal' setup for the Samyang. Will probably be getting that lens sometime soon!tim-b said:
david_b said:
I've not tried the Zeiss to be able to give a direct comparison unfortunately, but I've just grabbed a couple of old Nikkors and the Samyang feels pretty similar to these (105 f/2.5 and 180 f/2.8). It's a bit less than 180deg lock-to-lock as well, if that helps.
Thanks, that sounds good, IIRC I had to change grip 3 or 4 times to go lock-to-lock with the Zeiss....great for getting perfect focussing in a studio or on a tripod, not so good for wandering around the paddock at Goodwood (and it certainly looks sharp from your pic)! So glad to hear it's a 'normal' setup for the Samyang. Will probably be getting that lens sometime soon!
I think they do two versions now, a newer one with a chip ("UMC" version) and one without - mine is the slightly cheaper original one, but rather cunningly my D2H meters with it quite happily anyway. Can even manage the odd pan too (mainly because I forgot to change lenses...):
Goodwood Revival 2011 by david_b, on Flickr
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff


