Right tools for Rally

[anonymous-user]

We've all seen RallyMedia on youtube...
And over the last few years I've been going to more and more rallys. At the professional rally events my camera just isn't up to scratch and often the pictures appear dark because of the flash coming from the DSLR guys.
So I need a decent not mega bucks camera...
And secondly a good HD vidcam that would be similar quality to those on RallyMedia.

Any help much appreciated

[Simpo Two]

PSBuckshot said:

At the professional rally events my camera just isn't up to scratch and often the pictures appear dark because of the flash coming from the DSLR guys.
So I need a decent not mega bucks camera...

A second-hand DSLR would seem the answer - fast shutter release, fast autofocus (probably tracking), decent low light performance, choice of lenses according to wallet.

[markmullen]

It depends on budget but for rallying I use a Conon 1d mkii and 70-200, available used for less than £1000

[McMacro]

I use the Canon 40D and 7D mainly. The advantage of the 7D is it's handling of low light conditions, plus the video is superb (with a decent lens), just focusing is a pain in the arse.

You don't mention your budget?

Couple of shots as an example.

Shot with 40D and Canon 100-400:



Show with 40D and Canon 17-40:



Shot with 40D and Canon 70-200 f2.8IS:



Shot with 350D and Canon 17-40:



Shot with 350D and Canon 10-22:



The lens has to be really suited to your location really. I would highly recommend a decent body, just make sure it is weather sealed. Been soaked many a time and the 40D and 7D have never let me down.

[Number31]

Don't worry too much about the kit, the first picture below was taken on film with a 35-80mm Canon lens that is even worse than the kit lenses of today, the second shot at 12mm just shows that location means that you don't always need a telephoto. Just enjoy going out and taking photos the quality will come with practice rather than from Jessops ;-)





Number31.

Edited by Number31 on Saturday 3rd December 09:49

[anonymous-user]

Heard only good things about the 40D. Have to give it a look.
For the video I was looking more to a full purpose camera rather than a DLSR that shoots video. They always seem that bit better.

[anonymous-user]

How does the 1100D compare to the 40D? I know the 40D has a faster shutter speed....

[McMacro]

PSBuckshot said:

How does the 1100D compare to the 40D? I know the 40D has a faster shutter speed....

Larger screen, more frames per second (6.5 compared to 3), and weathersealed.

http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-s...

[anonymous-user]

McMacro said:

Larger screen, more frames per second (6.5 compared to 3), and weathersealed.

http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-s...

Good site, thank you.
Looking at those it looks like I'll lean towards the 40D.

[Dogsey]

McMacro said:

PSBuckshot said:

How does the 1100D compare to the 40D? I know the 40D has a faster shutter speed....

Larger screen, more frames per second (6.5 compared to 3), and weathersealed.

http://www.dpreview.com/products/compare/side-by-s...

Plus more controls on the body rather than on menus, larger buffer, better ergonomics ...

[anonymous-user]

Dogsey said:

Plus more controls on the body rather than on menus, larger buffer, better ergonomics ...

I prefer body controls on cameras, seems more accessible if you know what I mean.
Only downside is the 40D will not shoot video unless connected to a comp....
But for the price it looks pretty sweet.