Interesting photography from the 40's
Interesting photography from the 40's
Author
Discussion

NDA

Original Poster:

25,615 posts

254 months

Robbie B

7,715 posts

212 months

Saturday 8th October 2011
quotequote all
NDA said:
How on earth are they such high quality? I had no idea that was possible in the 40s.

Mr Beaumont

463 posts

234 months

Saturday 8th October 2011
quotequote all
Very odd to see such good quality photos and them be so old. You could confuse some of them for being sets/scenes in a modern film, set in the 1940s!

Olf

11,978 posts

247 months

Saturday 8th October 2011
quotequote all
Notice the complete absence of fatties....

Ben Magoo

547 posts

251 months

Saturday 8th October 2011
quotequote all
Wow thanks for that NDA, an incredibly interesting snapshot from a period dominated by pictures of the war in Europe.

It's interesting to see just how many kids clearly never wore shoes on a daily basis!

I think they were mostly shot on 620 roll film (Eastman Safety Kodak 62 - markings on some of the later frames) the quality is lovely.

Simpo Two

92,708 posts

294 months

Saturday 8th October 2011
quotequote all
Robbie B said:
How on earth are they such high quality? I had no idea that was possible in the 40s.
hehe Photography had been going for 100 years by the 1940s, even with like film and everything.


Now *this* is more astonishing: www.albertkahn.co.uk



Bacardi

2,235 posts

305 months

Saturday 8th October 2011
quotequote all
The notches on the edge indicates a lot of them were 4x5 sheet film. The notch code is for Kodachrome, which explains the loverly rich colours.

Yes, Autochromes are loverly, all you need is some dyed potato starch and you can make your own. The exact process has been lost but there are some people trying to recreate it.

LongQ

13,864 posts

262 months

Saturday 8th October 2011
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Robbie B said:
How on earth are they such high quality? I had no idea that was possible in the 40s.
hehe Photography had been going for 100 years by the 1940s, even with like film and everything.


Now *this* is more astonishing: www.albertkahn.co.uk
Or this ....

http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/empire/

Bear in mind that all of these, Albert-Kahn images and the pics in the original link will almost certainly have been posed for a purpose and most likely used large format cameras (certainly the earliest ones) for which high quality lenses were readily available at a price. The optics and film quality at that size do not present the same sort of if problems of physics that smaller film sizes do.

On the other hand the size and weight of the cameras, the slow speed of use and the awkwardness and challenges of the film of or glass slide processing certainly DO present some challenges. It's quite remarkable how many images survive.

Robbie B

7,715 posts

212 months

Saturday 8th October 2011
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Robbie B said:
How on earth are they such high quality? I had no idea that was possible in the 40s.
hehe Photography had been going for 100 years by the 1940s, even with like film and everything.


Now *this* is more astonishing: www.albertkahn.co.uk
eek Good lord.

I know a rough history of when photography came about etc., I just had no concept of how the quality improved. When I think 1930s - 1940s I think black and white hehe

S. Gonzales Esq.

2,559 posts

241 months

Saturday 8th October 2011
quotequote all
Try Shorpy.com for more historic large format stuff from the US.

Here's a sample: Flatiron

Simpo Two

92,708 posts

294 months

Saturday 8th October 2011
quotequote all
Bacardi said:
all you need is some dyed potato starch and you can make your own. The exact process has been lost but there are some people trying to recreate it.
...says Bacardi as he disappears into the cupboard under the stairs with a packet of Walkers crips, a flask of mule's urine, a magnifying glass and a torch biggrin


Robbie B said:
When I think 1930s - 1940s I think black and white hehe
True, colour was much more expensive and so the vast majority was b/w, notably Joe Public with their Box Brownies etc. American stuff is most likely to be in colour 'cos they had more money than us.

It is certainly a revelation to see WW2 etc in colour; suddenly the years collapse and you feel you can step in.

Bacardi

2,235 posts

305 months

Saturday 8th October 2011
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
...says Bacardi as he disappears into the cupboard under the stairs with a packet of Walkers crips, a flask of mule's urine, a magnifying glass and a torch biggrin
I tried it but it smelled and didn't work…. I'll stick to Tin Types.

S. Gonzales Esq. said:
Here's a sample: Flatiron
He wants colour, this is one of my favourites of the Flatiron from Stieglitz, not real colour but Gum bichromate over platinum, very ethereal from 1904…




Robbie B

7,715 posts

212 months

Sunday 9th October 2011
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
It is certainly a revelation to see WW2 etc in colour; suddenly the years collapse and you feel you can step in.
You know your stuff, sir, I'll give you that beer

Unless you're a 90 year old American, then I'm less impressed. hehe

NDA

Original Poster:

25,615 posts

254 months

Sunday 9th October 2011
quotequote all
Bacardi said:
He wants colour, this is one of my favourites of the Flatiron from Stieglitz, not real colour but Gum bichromate over platinum, very ethereal from 1904…

Lovely.....

Would make a superb framed print.... almost like a watercolour. I like that a lot.