NZ IPP awards 2011
Author
Discussion

RobDickinson

Original Poster:

31,343 posts

283 months

Thursday 1st September 2011
quotequote all
This years New Zealand Institute of Professional Photographers award winner has been announced.

Here is a selection of his winning work.

http://www.dphoto.co.nz/photography-news-6900/iris...

Just wondering what peoples views are of it. Before I put mine forward..

dxbtiger

4,546 posts

202 months

Thursday 1st September 2011
quotequote all
Speaking about his own work Wood says his focus is turning the intangible into visual elements.

“I am about evoking not only a scene, but the feeling of the invisibilities, mysteries, emotions and passion beneath its surface.”

blah blah blah, what?

half of those 6 are so overly PP that they fail at being being 'photos'

How's that for starters?

londonagent

635 posts

197 months

Thursday 1st September 2011
quotequote all
I'll bite. I agree with dxbtiger, over processed, too much PS.

Simpo Two

92,709 posts

294 months

Thursday 1st September 2011
quotequote all
Well they're certainly different from the 'NZ landscape' genre.

I like this one:


dxbtiger

4,546 posts

202 months

Thursday 1st September 2011
quotequote all
I should add that my opinion is heavily laced with Jack..

However, I visit this part of the forum to get inspired, as a photo n00b.

The above shots do nothing for me, nothing at all.

Give me a a GC, RD, 911 landscape, a DD bridge wink, a GF or 4lM car, a FPC shot of nothing much at all, all of which and others that I can't recall right now are truly, GREAT, photos.


LongQ

13,864 posts

262 months

Friday 2nd September 2011
quotequote all
Photography as art.

There seems to have been a lot of effort put into the creation at one or more points and they certainly have a style although how unique it is I have no idea. They do seem a little dark both as photos and as messages. Looking at one of the other news items the supporting image is also very dark. Is this a current NZ fashion?

I can sort of appreciate them as works but they don't strike me as startling images that I would be desperate to have on the wall somewhere.

paul911

2,771 posts

262 months

Friday 2nd September 2011
quotequote all
Well I’m going to be different and say I kind of like them. They look very HDR and heavily processed, but I like them. Particularly the one Simpo posted. smile

Dogsey

4,301 posts

259 months

Friday 2nd September 2011
quotequote all
As pieces of art I do quite like them, however I think the term "photograph" has been pushed beyond the limit with those works.

andy-xr

13,204 posts

233 months

Friday 2nd September 2011
quotequote all
They feel Flickr'y, remind me of what Miss Aniela was doing maybe 3 years or so ago but with more recent themes and concepts. Interesting post work, and it feels heavy on that aspect of it but I think they stand up with that level of shoppery, they def wouldn't work the same without it

Robbie B

7,715 posts

212 months

Friday 2nd September 2011
quotequote all
I don't find the pictures themselves to be particularly impressive. If you took away the HDR they are just average IMO. He is obviously very good at post processing and deserves praise for that, but I think photographer of the year should be someone who takes evocative and original photographs that don't rely as heavily on post production.

But hey, what do I know? smile

rxtx

6,050 posts

239 months

Friday 2nd September 2011
quotequote all
They don't look HDR to me, just very very processed. I sort of like the first one with the guy and feathers, in a dogs-playing-poker kind of way.

havoc

33,346 posts

264 months

Friday 2nd September 2011
quotequote all
Art rather than photography, IMHO.

Creative, sure.
Interesting - some are, some don't really gel with me.
But the best out there?!? Nah...I've seen much better from PH's own crew.


...but then to me photography is about showing something that is really there - transporting someone to a place, an event, a perspective. If it conveys the feelings at the time, so much better. These are very clearly staged, and as such to me are artificial.

RobDickinson

Original Poster:

31,343 posts

283 months

Friday 2nd September 2011
quotequote all
havoc said:
Art rather than photography, IMHO.
Overall my view also.

The NZIPP awards are usually won by seriously 'over processed' shots. Sometimes I wonder if entrants work the images more knowing this is the bias of the judges or not. This guy seems to be a perfect fit though.

What gets me is the fundamental photography underlying this photoshopery is , if not poor, not exemplary.

His portraits tend to very formulaic. Face on a 3rd, 'object on the other. 'Peter Beck' is probably the least processed and rather uninspiring photography.

Andrew Hunter / The Hat Maker are excellent final images but I'm not sure what photography had to do with them.

The Emilie shots are pure kidsploitation. Emilie the Pioneer looks a poor photoshop job even.

Worst out of the lot is the Basilica one. Horrid fake sky , sepia colour wash, nasty vignetting. Strikes me as trying to photoshop your way out of a very poor photo.

Perhaps the prints look better.

havoc

33,346 posts

264 months

Friday 2nd September 2011
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Perhaps the prints look better.
hehe

Can't look much worse...

Gemm

1,833 posts

244 months

Friday 2nd September 2011
quotequote all
I'd call it 'Photo-Art' award rather than photography. Personally I don't really like them, maybe except for the one that's posted above.