Cervini body kitted mustangs........

Cervini body kitted mustangs........

Author
Discussion

97BlackC5

Original Poster:

352 posts

245 months

Monday 2nd March 2009
quotequote all
C300, C350 & C500 just wondered what people thought about these particular cars vs a Rousch / Shelby?

largelunchbox

586 posts

208 months

Monday 2nd March 2009
quotequote all
i absolutely love em

LuS1fer

41,708 posts

252 months

Monday 2nd March 2009
quotequote all
I'm going to be diplomatic here and say it's a matter of taste. Not my cup of tea but then bodykits in general are a trade off between looks and added weight. The Roush doesn't look that much different from a normal GT and to get the Shelby nose, you have to buy a GT500 which weighs considerably more than a GT. You can fit it aftermarket to a GT but it's not cheap.

There are other "standrad kits" like Saleen (my favourite) and the Steeda Screaming Q and a variety of aftermarket kits ranging from subtle to Stevie Wonder big wing fast and furious abominations.

Of the kits, Cervini have a good reputation for quality. I have the Cervini side ducts and they're reasonable quality for what they are although I haven't written home about them yet. wink

drichardw

34 posts

209 months

Tuesday 31st March 2009
quotequote all
I've got a Cervini Eleanor kitted car and I've never been happier. It's coming to two years of ownership and it's in near perfect condition.

The rear spoiler sits a few mm too high on one side, The side exit exhausts are so tight against the sideskirts that they are hard to clean all around and they sit low, so they scrape speedbumps. Apart from that everything from the durability, to the standard of fit are amazing.

I still can't get over how many heads my car turns. It draws a crowd like almost no other car I know of too. They really are gorgeous motors.

Do yourself a favour and get one ;-)

benny.c

3,517 posts

214 months

Wednesday 1st April 2009
quotequote all
Not for me, but each to their own smile I much prefer the Roush, Saleen and GT500 look, but the Cervini kits are good quality.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

197 months

Monday 6th April 2009
quotequote all
97BlackC5 said:
C300, C350 & C500 just wondered what people thought about these particular cars vs a Rousch / Shelby?
Not a fan myself, but then I like the look of the Mustang GT just as it is. Maybe I'm odd?? biggrin

LuS1fer

41,708 posts

252 months

Monday 6th April 2009
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
97BlackC5 said:
C300, C350 & C500 just wondered what people thought about these particular cars vs a Rousch / Shelby?
Not a fan myself, but then I like the look of the Mustang GT just as it is. Maybe I'm odd?? biggrin
No not really. Some of us weirdos even like it without stripes. eek

matmoxon

5,026 posts

225 months

Monday 6th April 2009
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
300bhp/ton said:
97BlackC5 said:
C300, C350 & C500 just wondered what people thought about these particular cars vs a Rousch / Shelby?
Not a fan myself, but then I like the look of the Mustang GT just as it is. Maybe I'm odd?? biggrin
No not really. Some of us weirdos even like it without stripes. eek
Yup I like the standard ones too, my younger brother (23) can't understand why I wouldn't want a Body kitted one confused.

Not to say that the body kitted ones don't look nice some do some don't I just prefer the bodywork to stay standard with a few minor cosmetic tweaks to personalise the car a bit.

Matt

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

197 months

Monday 6th April 2009
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
300bhp/ton said:
97BlackC5 said:
C300, C350 & C500 just wondered what people thought about these particular cars vs a Rousch / Shelby?
Not a fan myself, but then I like the look of the Mustang GT just as it is. Maybe I'm odd?? biggrin
No not really. Some of us weirdos even like it without stripes. eek
biggrin

shamrock

980 posts

197 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all

My girlfriend was at the garage yesterday and said a bloke there had a Cervini 500 Mustang. I had never heard of it but apparently there are only 5 in the UK.

The OH knows I've got my eye on a VXR 500 so she knew I'd be interested in this little gem. Wish I'd seen it and been able to find out how it compares to the VXR 500 frown

benny.c

3,517 posts

214 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
There's way more than five knocking about.

LuS1fer

41,708 posts

252 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
The VXR500 is a lot heavier than a blown Mustang GT but maybe lighter than a lardy GT500, even more so wearing a bodykit.

shamrock

980 posts

197 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
The VXR500 is a lot heavier than a blown Mustang GT but maybe lighter than a lardy GT500, even more so wearing a bodykit.
I do like the looks of the Mustang, you have a very nice example, but the performance figures of the VXR 500 are very attracting. 0-100mph in 8.5 secs.

LuS1fer

41,708 posts

252 months

Thursday 9th April 2009
quotequote all
shamrock said:
LuS1fer said:
The VXR500 is a lot heavier than a blown Mustang GT but maybe lighter than a lardy GT500, even more so wearing a bodykit.
I do like the looks of the Mustang, you have a very nice example, but the performance figures of the VXR 500 are very attracting. 0-100mph in 8.5 secs.
8.5? I doubt it. CAR quoted 10.9 to 100 which is more like it. Even my Corvette Z06 which has a similar power to weight ratio as the blown Mustang, only does it in around 9 seconds and EVO said it performed about even with a Jag XKR in a straight line.

http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/Drives/Search-Results...

http://fifthgear.five.tv/jsp/5gmain.jsp?mnk=611&am...

I wouldn't rely on this contribution by "unknown" http://www.fastestlaps.com/car47dcc0302a077.html

Even the M5 is 10.0

Not that I'm even remotely trying to dissuade you. smile I'd love a VXR500 as well but not instead of my Mustang and you would have to change the suspension on the Mustang to make it handle properly.

shamrock

980 posts

197 months

Tuesday 14th April 2009
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
shamrock said:
LuS1fer said:
The VXR500 is a lot heavier than a blown Mustang GT but maybe lighter than a lardy GT500, even more so wearing a bodykit.
I do like the looks of the Mustang, you have a very nice example, but the performance figures of the VXR 500 are very attracting. 0-100mph in 8.5 secs.
8.5? I doubt it. CAR quoted 10.9 to 100 which is more like it. Even my Corvette Z06 which has a similar power to weight ratio as the blown Mustang, only does it in around 9 seconds and EVO said it performed about even with a Jag XKR in a straight line.

http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/Drives/Search-Results...

http://fifthgear.five.tv/jsp/5gmain.jsp?mnk=611&am...

I wouldn't rely on this contribution by "unknown" http://www.fastestlaps.com/car47dcc0302a077.html

Even the M5 is 10.0

Not that I'm even remotely trying to dissuade you. smile I'd love a VXR500 as well but not instead of my Mustang and you would have to change the suspension on the Mustang to make it handle properly.
Thanks for the info. It's a shame as the quoted 8.5s 0-100mph stat was the main selling point for me as it seemed quicker than the M6 and similar cars.

The Z06 is also on my shortlist. I shall ask over at the Monaro forum what the true stats for the VXR 500 are before ruling it out.

Thanks for the help.