Considering a Mustang Ecoboost as Company car.

Considering a Mustang Ecoboost as Company car.

Author
Discussion

interstellar

Original Poster:

3,784 posts

153 months

Saturday 19th January 2019
quotequote all
Let me start this by saving I can’t get the 5.0 due to my company car rules however I am not taxed on the car as I will own it which is why the eco boost is interesting.

I keep coming back to these and think I need to get one for a while for one reason only, why not.

It would be a fastback, ecoboost and auto probably in Kona blue with ceramic leather. Are there other option that are necessary? Sports exhaust?

What does the ecoboost sound like? I know it’s not the v8 but is it a fart in a thunderstorm or is it ok?

I am currently in a 640i having come from an M4 and an S5 but love the look of these and need to tick a box I think.

Thoughts from any ecoboost owners?

interstellar

Original Poster:

3,784 posts

153 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
Well that says it all, zero replies so I guess these are really that unpopular.

I looked st one yesterday and it sounds like a fiesta !!

The 2019 model now has a sports exhaust and the clips on you tube show it’s much better with 4 switchable modes but this is only on the 2019 model.

For that money I would rather get another M4 which I thought was an absolute weapon.

Ecosseven

2,094 posts

224 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
The Ecoboost is probably a very good car. The problem is the Mustang name. Many people in the UK view the Mustang as an Amercican icon (quite rightly) and want the V8.

Viewed in isolation as a stylish RWD 2+2 coupe with decent performance, looks, and handling then it certainly has some appeal, particularly if you are happy with have it remapped. I think of Ecoboosts as a modern day 90's jap coupe - something similar to a Nissan 300ZX.

I do think they are over priced for what they are. At around £30k I think they would sell a lot more.




LuS1fer

41,752 posts

252 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
The problem with the latest Mustang is that it looks like lots of other coupes. I have a 2005 Mustang but barely give these cars a second glance or notice them.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

268 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
The problem with the latest Mustang is that it looks like lots of other coupes. I have a 2005 Mustang but barely give these cars a second glance or notice them.
Is that a bad thing?

WonkeyDonkey

2,419 posts

110 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
I still find the mustang stands out despite seeing them quite regularly now. Quite distinct compared to the German beige that dominates the roads currently.

I'd go for one, in an ideal world you'd get the V8, but I'm sure the ecoboost will still be great car to drive, especially if primarily for commuting.

LuS1fer

41,752 posts

252 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
LuS1fer said:
The problem with the latest Mustang is that it looks like lots of other coupes. I have a 2005 Mustang but barely give these cars a second glance or notice them.
Is that a bad thing?
For a Mustang, yes. I keep thinking they are Audis...

David Beer

3,982 posts

274 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
Having a V8 convertible i had a rental eco convertible at Xmas . Yep it does move but it is hard work, pedal to the metal in order go forward. I suggest a drive in one.

slowhand99

242 posts

115 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
For a Mustang, yes. I keep thinking they are Audis...
Maybe an eye test?

interstellar

Original Poster:

3,784 posts

153 months

Sunday 20th January 2019
quotequote all
David Beer said:
Having a V8 convertible i had a rental eco convertible at Xmas . Yep it does move but it is hard work, pedal to the metal in order go forward. I suggest a drive in one.
Already decided to give it a miss. Have a 640i at the moment and will go back to an M4.

CaptainSensib1e

1,451 posts

228 months

Wednesday 23rd January 2019
quotequote all
Are you looking at a brand new one? Worth noting the ecoboost saw a small drop in power with the MY18 facelift. For that reason, I'd probbaly look at one a couple of years old if that's a possibility.

interstellar

Original Poster:

3,784 posts

153 months

Wednesday 23rd January 2019
quotequote all
I am going to pass, I won’t be satisfied with a sheep in sheep’s clothing.

Back to an M4.

jrinns

375 posts

190 months

Wednesday 30th January 2019
quotequote all
We had a 2.3 and 5.0 both with Borla exhausts for extended test drives, the 2.3 was more responsive and up for driving aggressively.

The 5.0 felt totally different, they feel like different cars and in hindsight, we would have been happy with a 2.3. We purchased the 5.0 as it just felt like the thing to do for not much more money, its a 3rd car. If it had been a 2nd car the 2.3 makes sense and I would still enjoy the drive.

Can't understand the love affair with all things German, I like them don't get me wrong but my F10 M5, which I got new was twice as much cash as the 5.0. And isn't twice the car. Make of that what you will.....

Maybe the price difference between the M4 and 2.3 is not that much in the current market?

David Beer

3,982 posts

274 months

Wednesday 30th January 2019
quotequote all
jrinns said:
We had a 2.3 and 5.0 both with Borla exhausts for extended test drives, the 2.3 was more responsive and up for driving aggressively.

The 5.0 felt totally different, they feel like different cars and in hindsight, we would have been happy with a 2.3. We purchased the 5.0 as it just felt like the thing to do for not much more money, its a 3rd car. If it had been a 2nd car the 2.3 makes sense and I would still enjoy the drive.

Can't understand the love affair with all things German, I like them don't get me wrong but my F10 M5, which I got new was twice as much cash as the 5.0. And isn't twice the car. Make of that what you will.....

Maybe the price difference between the M4 and 2.3 is not that much in the current market?
I only drove the 2.3 down the Florida keys, 130 miles. Up a slight hill you had to bury the pedal and found it hard work, basically you had to “rag it”. In the GT you do not notice a hill !
I went from a griff 500 to a merc SLK 250 amg, now that was a surprising twin turbo diesel .
Saw them everywhere so went for the gt convertible. In a year i have only seen one GT convertable.
Iam not a speed freak, my other car is a SVX defender convertable !

interstellar

Original Poster:

3,784 posts

153 months

Wednesday 30th January 2019
quotequote all
jrinns said:
We had a 2.3 and 5.0 both with Borla exhausts for extended test drives, the 2.3 was more responsive and up for driving aggressively.

The 5.0 felt totally different, they feel like different cars and in hindsight, we would have been happy with a 2.3. We purchased the 5.0 as it just felt like the thing to do for not much more money, its a 3rd car. If it had been a 2nd car the 2.3 makes sense and I would still enjoy the drive.

Can't understand the love affair with all things German, I like them don't get me wrong but my F10 M5, which I got new was twice as much cash as the 5.0. And isn't twice the car. Make of that what you will.....

Maybe the price difference between the M4 and 2.3 is not that much in the current market?
I would buy brand new but 35k gets a decent M4 these days.

Oxfordboy

3 posts

69 months

Tuesday 19th February 2019
quotequote all
So I have a 2.3 EcoB, had it from new. 2018, its a 2015/17 model. Its simply fab.. Yes its not a 5.0 and lacks the amazing noise, but its damn fast, its almost the same car and still puts a smile on my face every time i drive it. I have done 15k in year 1 so far. its my daily driver, totally practical for me, great for 2 seats up front and kids in the back, but its no family car !!!
I get 31 MPG with mixed driving urban and motorway, and I am not "too gentle" The Pirrelli stock tyres are awful, and hate the cold weather, summers great and it handles fine, but its not a BMW or Audi, but its not £40k+ either..
It is a Ford and does have some cheap plastics inside, but I don't make a habit of looking at them when I am driving.. Dash is good, stereo with the Shaker Sync 3 is very good. and seats are very good too.. I am a 6 footer and its super comfy.. But you have to remember its a Ford and its a Cheap American Sports Tourer.. its not a BMW nor a Audi or a Merc, but it is a Mustang and that's exactly it. Its a Mustang.. and everyone cant wait to talk to me when they know I have a Mustang... its a cult. When was the last time a fellow Audi driver waved to you and spoke to you at the petrol station. That's the point.. its so totally different.
If I had the money I would love a V8 but it would cost me £2.5k a year to pay the extra fuel to my EB.. its easy logic ..

David Beer

3,982 posts

274 months

Tuesday 19th February 2019
quotequote all
Oxfordboy said:
So I have a 2.3 EcoB, had it from new. 2018, its a 2015/17 model. Its simply fab.. Yes its not a 5.0 and lacks the amazing noise, but its damn fast, its almost the same car and still puts a smile on my face every time i drive it. I have done 15k in year 1 so far. its my daily driver, totally practical for me, great for 2 seats up front and kids in the back, but its no family car !!!
I get 31 MPG with mixed driving urban and motorway, and I am not "too gentle" The Pirrelli stock tyres are awful, and hate the cold weather, summers great and it handles fine, but its not a BMW or Audi, but its not £40k+ either..
It is a Ford and does have some cheap plastics inside, but I don't make a habit of looking at them when I am driving.. Dash is good, stereo with the Shaker Sync 3 is very good. and seats are very good too.. I am a 6 footer and its super comfy.. But you have to remember its a Ford and its a Cheap American Sports Tourer.. its not a BMW nor a Audi or a Merc, but it is a Mustang and that's exactly it. Its a Mustang.. and everyone cant wait to talk to me when they know I have a Mustang... its a cult. When was the last time a fellow Audi driver waved to you and spoke to you at the petrol station. That's the point.. its so totally different.
If I had the money I would love a V8 but it would cost me £2.5k a year to pay the extra fuel to my EB.. its easy logic ..
I guess the fuel consumption is easy to calculate, the V8 will use twice as much !
I had a SLK 250 AMG before the Mustang V8 convertable,would i go back ? No way. The Mustang is no cheaper inside for me, in fact whenever i park with the roof down, the number of people who comment is almost embarrassing. Just today a guy said it looked more Italian than Yank.
Thankfully the mpg is not an issue as i think i will do 1500 by the end of my first year !


Edited by David Beer on Tuesday 19th February 19:03

Bearintown

64 posts

124 months

Tuesday 19th February 2019
quotequote all
31 mpg for Eco your saying
23 my average for GT
at 15000 miles that about £900 extra per year.
Just saying lol

downthepub

1,382 posts

213 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
My V8 overall average is 23.7mpg, and that includes a healthy dose of town driving. On a run at 60/70mph it does close to 30mpg.

Not as efficient as the EB, but for a 5.0 it's not shabby at all! Certainly not twice.

Saleen836

11,442 posts

216 months

Wednesday 20th February 2019
quotequote all
downthepub said:
My V8 overall average is 23.7mpg, and that includes a healthy dose of town driving. On a run at 60/70mph it does close to 30mpg.

Not as efficient as the EB, but for a 5.0 it's not shabby at all! Certainly not twice.
I never understand why people assume a V8 will drink twice as much as an EB.
My supercharged V8 on a trip north following a mate in his Mk2 Focus RS at a constant 75ish mph on the motorway returned an almost identical mpg as him (him 29 me 28mpg)