RE: Saleen Mustang S281 Supercharged Roadster

RE: Saleen Mustang S281 Supercharged Roadster

Friday 28th January 2005

Saleen Mustang S281 Supercharged Roadster

Nauman Farooq explores this supercharged roadster


With the launch of the much-anticipated 2005 Mustang a few weeks ago in North America, I thought it would be appropriate to take one last look at the outgoing model (also do it -- as I write this -- while we are technically in 2004). And what better way than to look at the best and most outrageous model of its generation, the Saleen S281 Supercharged Roadster.

Saleen has been very heavily involved with customised, factory approved Mustangs for two-decades now. The cars are so heavily modified, that Saleen is recognised as a manufacturer, not just a modifier. That's why this car is called a Saleen Mustang, and not a Ford Saleen Mustang.

Saleen's extensive work just doesn't finish at an eye-pleasing body kit and a mammoth supercharger for those eye-popping acceleration runs. In fact, Saleen modifies the chassis, and even puts its patented live-beam rear axle to the car, to help make the car perform unlike any other Mustang on the road.

To test how good this Mustang really is, I picked up a Saleen S281 from the only authorised Saleen dealer in Ontario, Erinwood Ford in Mississauga. The car I got was equipped with just about every option you can specify, thus pushing the price tag to near CAN$80,000 -- that's £35,000 in real money.

That much for a Mustang? This had better be really good -- after all, you can buy some truly fabulous machines for that sort of money. That task would be especially hard to achieve since the Mustang platform isn't anywhere near the best basis to start off on.

So my expectations of this vehicle weren't very high, but all that was about to change, very quickly, after I put some very high-octane fuel in this hungry beast. Firing up the engine, it awakes with a very angry growl, planting a huge grin on my face. This was going to be fun -- a lot of fun.

I crawl around on city streets in second gear, listening to that fabulous exhaust note. You know the old saying, there ain't no substitute for cubic-inches? This car proves that, not only with its sound but also in the way it lunges forward when you stab that accelerator as if it were attached to a giant slingshot.

The speed rises quickly, and before you know it, you'll be well into speeds that would leave you explaining yourself to a judge. It'll go from 0-60 mph in 4.8 seconds, and top out at close to 170 mph, if your nerves can handle it. Those numbers are the work of the 4.6-litre V8 with a supercharger bolted on, which now produces 380 hp and 415 lb-ft of torque. Power is handled by a five-speed manual gearbox that is beefed up, along with the clutch -- make that a very heavy clutch.

So, it can handle its newfound power but, unlike regular Mustangs, this one can handle corners too. Mustangs have never been regarded as good handling cars, which is disgracefully disappointing for a sports car. Most lay the blame for its lack of handling on the live rear axle. The Saleen with its patented rear axle design proves those cynics wrong. I won't try to explain the geometry of this suspension system -- truth is, I don't know how it works myself -- but I can tell you that it works very well.

So, this is a Mustang that you can point into a corner and execute it with speeds you'd think are impossible. Not only will the car come out shining through, you'll also be smiling from ear to ear.

However, stomp on the brakes and you are overcome with fear. You see, the brakes aren't quite up to the standard a car of such power demands. It has dinner-plate discs upfront but, in the rear, it still sports the standard car's tiny side-plates. This means, under heavy braking, you'll get lots of dive in the front, which can unsettle the rear.

This car can be a handful to drive, but when you learn how to handle this car properly, it'll excite you in ways most of today's sportscars with their techno-wizardry just can't.

Just when I was really enjoying myself, the fuel light came on again, and I was in the hunt for a Sunoco gas station. Why Sunoco you ask?

Because of the way this engine is tuned, it'll only run on 94-octane gasoline from Sunoco; in Canada, most gas stations have at best 91 octane. Use any lesser octane and you are in fear of burning the engine out.

That means you cannot use this car over long distances in Canada as highway rest stops usually do not serve 94 octane fuel. If you want to drive from Toronto to Montreal (home of Saleen Canada), you either have to fill your trunk with jerry cans, or rent another car.

Its fuel requirement is perhaps the biggest drawback to this car. Even if I could afford to buy this car, its picky appetite would be the reason I'd look elsewhere.

That's a huge shame, because I really loved this car. With a base price for a S281 Supercharged coupe at $68,000 (£29,100), it sounds like a lot of money, but this is better than any Corvette I have ever driven (and Corvettes cost about the same).

You know something, I like this car so much, if I could afford it, I might look into a cheap daily driver for those everyday chores, and keep the Saleen tucked away for the weekends. This way, I can listen to that wonderful centrally mounted exhaust whenever I want. I really do love that exhaust.

Author
Discussion

skinny

Original Poster:

5,269 posts

242 months

Friday 28th January 2005
quotequote all
story said:
It has dinner-plate discs upfront but, in the rear, it still sports the standard car's tiny side-plates. This means, under heavy braking, you'll get lots of dive in the front, which can unsettle the rear.


surely with bigger rear brakes the rear would be even more unsettled then?


story said:
Because of the way this engine is tuned, it'll only run on 94-octane gasoline from Sunoco; in Canada, most gas stations have at best 91 octane.


Is this RON!? is this why north american cars have such crap fuel economy and poor specific power - as their engines have be in a low state of tune compared to those in europe?

do like saleen tho

sancho

18 posts

258 months

Friday 28th January 2005
quotequote all
story said:
thus pushing the price tag to near CAN$80,000 -- that's £35,000 in real money.

What do you mean real money? Naw just playing around I know the money here in Canada looks like Monopoly money, and then we have the stupid 'loonie' and the 'toonie'. Great car though, paying for petrol sounds like fun, and well finding petrol sounds like an adventure, great review, hope you enjoyed your stay in Canada, even if it was close to Toronto.

bertie

8,566 posts

291 months

Friday 28th January 2005
quotequote all
That is one plug ugly gurner of a car with all the sublety and charm of a steam hammer!

pico

1 posts

241 months

Friday 28th January 2005
quotequote all
Like the car, have driven the normal V8 a few times in the states, goes well enough and there aren't any corners anyway so handling wasn't much of an issue. Could you use an octane booster? There is a company called Barque or something like that that do a 95 to 98 octane pellet that fits in your fuel tank.

blown 5.0

116 posts

267 months

Friday 28th January 2005
quotequote all
brother had the older s351 {500 hp and 495 ft lbs of torque , i had to settle with a s281 ,the s351 was a real ferrari eater on many a trip to Le Mans , saleens a good car but if you want a real rocket buy an 03 to 04 svt Cobra stock it will out run a s281 but 500 rear wheel horse power is available for $2000 and the stock motor will take in the region of 800 rear wheel horse power with out pulling a valve cover off.Has a IRS rear end to . If you dont believe it check out kenne bells web site or svt performance among many.

uk89camaro

1,399 posts

240 months

Friday 28th January 2005
quotequote all
bertie said:
That is one plug ugly gurner of a car


I'm afraid I agree.

blown 5.0

116 posts

267 months

Saturday 29th January 2005
quotequote all
i know who you are and where you live ,chevy boy.

>> Edited by blown 5.0 on Saturday 29th January 01:12

Road_Terrorist

5,591 posts

249 months

Saturday 29th January 2005
quotequote all
No substitute for cubes eh? Then how come that has the puny 4.6L engined variant? And it has a supercharger? So much for cubes... That is a great engine though, pity the rest of the car is rubbish, should put that engine in a decent car, put roof on it and give it the full 5.4 Litres. Oh wait they have a Falcon XR8

FestivAli

1,102 posts

245 months

Saturday 29th January 2005
quotequote all
Road_Terrorist said:
No substitute for cubes eh? Then how come that has the puny 4.6L engined variant? And it has a supercharger? So much for cubes... That is a great engine though, pity the rest of the car is rubbish, should put that engine in a decent car, put roof on it and give it the full 5.4 Litres. Oh wait they have a Falcon XR8



I have one problem with that: The XR8 gets beaten down the line and around corners by the smaller capacity, lighter weight turbo 6 in the XR6. I'd call that a substitute for cubes...

aww999

2,069 posts

268 months

Saturday 29th January 2005
quotequote all
Those octane figures are MON, not RON. If you wanted to run it on the lower octane fuel you could put a bigger pulley on the scupercharger for lower boost, with the corresponding loss of bhp though.

big.bad.wolfie

910 posts

247 months

Saturday 29th January 2005
quotequote all
RON MON PON
90 83 86.6
92 85 88.5
95 87 91
96 88 92
98 90 94
100 91.5 95.8
105 95 100
110 99 104.5

So 94 MON is about 103.5.....bloody hell!

uk89camaro

1,399 posts

240 months

Saturday 29th January 2005
quotequote all
blown 5.0 said:
i know who you are and where you live ,chevy boy.

>> Edited by blown 5.0 on Saturday 29th January 01:12


If that's for me, I currently run a 2001 GT.

blown 5.0

116 posts

267 months

Saturday 29th January 2005
quotequote all
i take it all back ,my girlfriends got a 2000 GT rag top that we imported last year .I guess saleen recomend 92 or 93 oct fuel

pvapour

8,981 posts

260 months

Saturday 29th January 2005
quotequote all
FestivAli said:

Road_Terrorist said:
No substitute for cubes eh? Then how come that has the puny 4.6L engined variant? And it has a supercharger? So much for cubes... That is a great engine though, pity the rest of the car is rubbish, should put that engine in a decent car, put roof on it and give it the full 5.4 Litres. Oh wait they have a Falcon XR8




I have one problem with that: The XR8 gets beaten down the line and around corners by the smaller capacity, lighter weight turbo 6 in the XR6. I'd call that a substitute for cubes...




to right cobber!

planetdave

9,921 posts

260 months

Saturday 29th January 2005
quotequote all
Do they not have 'octane boosters' in Canadadada?

blown 5.0

116 posts

267 months

Sunday 30th January 2005
quotequote all
I have a problem with that , my 91 GT 5.0 , low 11s at 122 mph on pump fuel on slicks full weight inc ice ,mild tune stock short block , damn i forgot my paxton novi.Joking a side , i know small motors can make big hp but it cost a lot more to do it.Went to Orlando , Street nationals last year ,Chuck Samuel won the pro class with his small block turbo Mustang beating many a 600 plus cubic inch nitrous motor ,so if you conbine a big cube motor and turbos, 2000 plus horsepower is the end result .

blown 5.0

116 posts

267 months

Sunday 30th January 2005
quotequote all
Road Terrorist , why dont you put a blower or something on that Falcon of yours , would make a bloody good street sleeper.

speedy_thrills

7,775 posts

250 months

Monday 31st January 2005
quotequote all
aww999 said:
Those octane figures are MON, not RON. If you wanted to run it on the lower octane fuel you could put a bigger pulley on the scupercharger for lower boost, with the corresponding loss of bhp though.

I would suggest that a water injection system may be a slightly better alternative here given the engines immense fuel consumption and that it is indeed forced induction. The engine life may even be prolonged if the system is installed correctly.

I’m not that impressed with the car itself however, but I’m not generally a fan of large displacement engines or crude cars any way.

v8thunder

27,646 posts

265 months

Monday 31st January 2005
quotequote all
There's a bloke who lives near me who's got the coupe version of this. Great noise, shattering performance, but why the bodykit? Why can't anyone make anything look 'naturally' aggressive any more? Why do we have to resort to plastic surgery?

jvaughan

6,025 posts

290 months

Monday 31st January 2005
quotequote all
Now that I like ....

281 Drop Top, in that yellow, or even orange. Graphite wheels .. or even chrome .... Hmmmm Bye bye TVR