Engine braking

Author
Discussion

Cock Womble 7

Original Poster:

29,908 posts

235 months

Wednesday 30th June 2010
quotequote all
How come the engine braking on "Katie" is so, well, brutal? Lift off the throttle and I seem to hit an invisible wall.

Is it the lightened flywheel, or just the fact that it's a very light car?

I swear that the engine braking on the Caterham is better than the actual braking on my old Scirocco (notoriously bad brakes).

Mars

8,947 posts

219 months

Wednesday 30th June 2010
quotequote all
Fairly high compression, lightweight and light flywheel will all work together on the overrun. Makes you conscious of the potential for spinning in the wet.

snapper seven

713 posts

219 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
Not to mention the 'air-brake' effect a full screen has. Plays a big role in (negatively) affecting areodynamics - hence why the likes of the old Merc 300SLR had such a big air brake, the Bugatti Veyron/McLaren F1 etc all have deployable vertical wings.

I fitted brooklands aero screens to my car a while back and really noticed the difference in acceleration and throttle pick up at higher speeds because it could push through the air more easily.

Cheers
SS

Cock Womble 7

Original Poster:

29,908 posts

235 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
snapper seven said:
Not to mention the 'air-brake' effect a full screen has. Plays a big role in (negatively) affecting areodynamics
Hadn't thought of that!

maturin23

595 posts

227 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
I read somewhere recently that the CD of the Caterham is around .9

Coming off the throttle at 70 does feel rather like deploying an airbrake..

ewenm

28,506 posts

250 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
Cock Womble 7 said:
snapper seven said:
Not to mention the 'air-brake' effect a full screen has. Plays a big role in (negatively) affecting areodynamics
Hadn't thought of that!
Try it with an aeroscreen - makes a huge difference to the retardation wink

Cock Womble 7

Original Poster:

29,908 posts

235 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
maturin23 said:
I read somewhere recently that the CD of the Caterham is around .9
The always reliable Wikipedia suggests that the Caterham is 0.7 - worse than a Hummer H2!

ewenm

28,506 posts

250 months

Thursday 1st July 2010
quotequote all
Cock Womble 7 said:
maturin23 said:
I read somewhere recently that the CD of the Caterham is around .9
The always reliable Wikipedia suggests that the Caterham is 0.7 - worse than a Hummer H2!
Although it is CdA that is more relevant - Cd x frontal area of the car.

Noger

7,117 posts

254 months

Friday 2nd July 2010
quotequote all
Yes, the CdA is about the same as an Elise. Less if you ditch the screen.

I would imagine low mass would be they key, coupled with fairly high (numerical) gear ratios which increases the engine braking torque.

edb49

1,652 posts

210 months

Friday 2nd July 2010
quotequote all
Also compared to lots of modern cars, the Caterham will stop fuelling when you come off the throttle - modern cars keep fuelling a little bit to aid smoother driving.

fergus

6,430 posts

280 months

Friday 2nd July 2010
quotequote all
edb49 said:
Also compared to lots of modern cars, the Caterham will stop fuelling when you come off the throttle - modern cars keep fuelling a little bit to aid smoother driving.
? most modern maps will have accel and decel clamp tables in them. I'm not sure if the stock caterham map/ECU does this, but most decent aftermarket ECUs offer these adjustments.

Murph7355

38,647 posts

261 months

Friday 2nd July 2010
quotequote all
Mars said:
...Makes you conscious of the potential for spinning in the wet.
Makes you doubly careful to match road with engine speeds smile

Though a bit of "rear steer" can be handy at times.