Bugger, bugger, bugger - Roadsport v Superlight

Bugger, bugger, bugger - Roadsport v Superlight

Author
Discussion

Trikster

Original Poster:

841 posts

207 months

Wednesday 26th August 2009
quotequote all
Well thought my sensible head had won - after driving the Roadsport 125 at the weekend was heading towards ordering a new car rather than a used one and have something for the spring...

Now they've just phoned up and offered me a Superlight with the 150 Sigma engine in it, but with the 'comfort' stuff too - heater/weather gear plus 6 speed box, uprated brakes .. for probably what I'd spend on speccing up a new 125... arrgh!

OK, may try and get over tomorrow to have a butchers/drive - but from you guys experince will an 'amateur' like me notice the differences - is the Superlight 150 a better ownership proposition, how does the 6 speed compare to the 5 speed etc. etc. - have some great driving roads round where I live so lots of road use, plus hope to use this as the entry to track days....

Dave J

891 posts

271 months

Wednesday 26th August 2009
quotequote all
I wouldnt buy a sigma engined car. I think they will undesirable for resale with the duratec in the range. The sigma offers limited tunability and will possibly end up like the 8v Vauxhall classic cars ?.

Snapper7

990 posts

264 months

Wednesday 26th August 2009
quotequote all
I have had the six speed box and the 5x speed box.. The 6 Speed is far more on the button than the 5 speed. Although if you only want the car for touring, the 5 speed box is easier on the ear while at Motorway speed.

On the Sigma engine. the extra BHP is only at the top end of the revs from what I understand, so you will only get the benefit if you are giving it some. Combined with the 6 speed box over the 125bhp and 5 speed box there is a big difference. The Superlight version (If I am correct, may have changed recently) would also give you adjustable wide track suspension which would also be a big benefit.

But I would want to see the spec of both and know more about what you want to do with the car.

Personally I would go for the 150bhp, 6 speed, wide track superlight car over the 125bhp Roadsport if they are the same money. I think it would hold its value better.

But

Dave is correct that a Duratec would be a better option if it falls within your price.

Are you being offered this upgrade because Caterham have an order that has fallen through or they have surplus?


Trikster

Original Poster:

841 posts

207 months

Wednesday 26th August 2009
quotequote all
Ahh, thanks guys - my post wasn't clear - the Superlight would be a 1 year old car.

Decisions to be made... :s

7 Sevens

658 posts

226 months

Wednesday 26th August 2009
quotequote all
I would try the Superlight as personally that would be my choice. I think you will enjoy the extra power and 6 speed box more but if you don't at least you've tried it.

Trikster

Original Poster:

841 posts

207 months

Wednesday 26th August 2009
quotequote all
Right, dealer's now come back and Superlight at little more pricey than he first anticipated - they're getting the car in tomorrow... looking out the window at the driving rain.... oh I hate buying cars wink

BertBert

19,488 posts

216 months

Wednesday 26th August 2009
quotequote all
I've been casting my eye back towards Caterham ownership again. My favourite (out of Vx HPC, SLR, R500) was my k-series 1600 exec superlight. But I thought I'd focus on the new-worlde caterhams rather than the olde-worlde ones.

The problem is that there is in my mind some stigma associated with the sigma. I have absolutely no idea why. Just like my kids, haven't tried it but don't like it.

Once you get into the D world, it all gets much more expensive. If you have an R300, you might as well have an R400. I am not sure I want to get up to those pwoer levels again.

I suspect I'll be back with a 1600ss again for 12 or 13k!

Bert

rubystone

11,254 posts

264 months

Wednesday 26th August 2009
quotequote all
BertBert said:
I've been casting my eye back towards Caterham ownership again. My favourite (out of Vx HPC, SLR, R500) was my k-series 1600 exec superlight. But I thought I'd focus on the new-worlde caterhams rather than the olde-worlde ones.

The problem is that there is in my mind some stigma associated with the sigma. I have absolutely no idea why. Just like my kids, haven't tried it but don't like it.

Once you get into the D world, it all gets much more expensive. If you have an R300, you might as well have an R400. I am not sure I want to get up to those pwoer levels again.

I suspect I'll be back with a 1600ss again for 12 or 13k!

Bert
Graham - that blue Superlight? I knew that car before you bought it - nearly bought it myself actually! As you may know, I really rate the DR300 - enough power and nice torque spread but still revvy. Great car for consistent lappery on trackdays and yet still not too much of an animal - I put in far more consistent laps of Brands Indy in that car than in my R500 - OK so not as outrightly fast, but easier to drive nearer the limit that the R500.

BertBert

19,488 posts

216 months

Thursday 27th August 2009
quotequote all
rubystone said:
BertBert said:
I've been casting my eye back towards Caterham ownership again. My favourite (out of Vx HPC, SLR, R500) was my k-series 1600 exec superlight. But I thought I'd focus on the new-worlde caterhams rather than the olde-worlde ones.

The problem is that there is in my mind some stigma associated with the sigma. I have absolutely no idea why. Just like my kids, haven't tried it but don't like it.

Once you get into the D world, it all gets much more expensive. If you have an R300, you might as well have an R400. I am not sure I want to get up to those pwoer levels again.

I suspect I'll be back with a 1600ss again for 12 or 13k!

Bert
Graham - that blue Superlight? I knew that car before you bought it - nearly bought it myself actually! As you may know, I really rate the DR300 - enough power and nice torque spread but still revvy. Great car for consistent lappery on trackdays and yet still not too much of an animal - I put in far more consistent laps of Brands Indy in that car than in my R500 - OK so not as outrightly fast, but easier to drive nearer the limit that the R500.
My 1600 was titanium silver, came from shiny andy at bookatrack, now with John Howe being durateched. Sounds good about the DR300, I'll have to go and give one a drive alonside the sigma (when footy is working again).

Piers917

559 posts

229 months

Thursday 27th August 2009
quotequote all
BertBert said:
I am not sure I want to get up to those pwoer levels again.


Bert
Can I ask why BB? I have a Superlight at the moment but i'd love to have another 50bhp.

allen l

443 posts

183 months

Thursday 27th August 2009
quotequote all
It will always be the question how far you want to go. On one hand I know I don't have a 110% control over my 160 bhp Caterham at all times. On the on the other hand, you still get used to the power output. Especially on the straights of the track. biggrin

Thinking about upgrading it to 185 only. Who knows what I'll think of that next year...

Graham E

12,829 posts

191 months

Thursday 27th August 2009
quotequote all
OP, big vote for wide track and 6 speed from me, they both really add to the car.

BertBert

19,488 posts

216 months

Thursday 27th August 2009
quotequote all
Piers917 said:
BertBert said:
I am not sure I want to get up to those pwoer levels again.


Bert
Can I ask why BB? I have a Superlight at the moment but i'd love to have another 50bhp.
It's just a preference. In my caterham experience I went 165, 190, 230, 135 bhp. The best fun for me was the last one. Maybe it's about the power/grip balance. The net is that I dont seek higher and higher power.

Bert