RE: Caterham 7 hits max economy

RE: Caterham 7 hits max economy

Thursday 27th July 2006

Caterham 7 hits max economy

Eco-marathon figure beggars belief


Slippery Caterham Seven
Slippery Caterham Seven
Caterham is famed for producing some of the fastest cars in the world, but what about one capable of returning 131 miles per gallon?

That’s exactly what a modified Caterham Seven achieved at the recent Shell Eco-Marathon at Rockingham.

Customised by carbon fibre specialist Axon Automotive, with the support of Energy-Efficient Motorsport (EEMS), the standard Caterham Seven Roadsport 1.6-litre K Series used enhanced aerodynamics, new lightweight seating, narrow low rolling resistance tyres and economic driving techniques to ensure it maximised every drop of fuel. The sportscar smashed the team’s initial 100mpg target.

The Shell Eco-Marathon is an annual competition to determine the car with the greatest fuel economy after 40 minutes driving and seven laps of the track at a minimum of 15mph. Each entry must meet strict safety requirements and drive using as little petrol, LPG, diesel or hydrogen as possible.

Axon Automotive project leader, Dr Steve Cousins comments: "We are showing that careful driving and relatively simple modifications to conventional cars can lead to significant fuel savings. Significantly the Caterham 2R was the only car in the competition that was moulded from a road-legal vehicle."

Author
Discussion

mafioso

Original Poster:

2,370 posts

221 months

Thursday 27th July 2006
quotequote all
Hmmmmm well done to them(!), but it ain't the prettiest Caterham i've ever seen!! But can you imagine how slowly the fuel guage would go down!?

marsdalebear

136 posts

254 months

Thursday 27th July 2006
quotequote all
15 MPH???????????????? Not exactly the reason to buy a Cateringvan

Jon Ison

1,304 posts

240 months

Thursday 27th July 2006
quotequote all
The fuel gauge is not one I worry about with this type of car, when there empty I put some in, if anyone asks whats the mpg I give an honest answer, aint got a clue.

errek72

943 posts

253 months

Thursday 27th July 2006
quotequote all
Well that should shut up the green nutters. Catherhams all round for everyone.
If they want to ban SUV's, we want free Caterhams in return.
Although I won't promise I'll leave mine tuned to max mpg

MrKipling43

5,788 posts

223 months

Thursday 27th July 2006
quotequote all
Well, I got nearly 300 miles out of the tank in the SV - it was press car and lets just say it wasn't driven in an economically sympathetic fashion.

They're just so light the motor hardly has to do any work.

cyberface

12,214 posts

264 months

Thursday 27th July 2006
quotequote all
Tripe. That's so far removed from practical transport they may as well have used a Honda C90 Cub and got 150 miles per gallon. It probably would have been more comfortable.

The whole point of the 7 is enthusiastic fast driving - nobody would put up with all the disadvantages of the Caterham to save a few quid on petrol FFS.

I'm not normally a miserable boo-boy but this seems not only largely pointless, but almost an embarrassing display appearing like they're trying to suck up to the green anti-car tts.

(back off rant box, the wheels look like the collapsible space saver in the front of my 911!)

slinky

15,704 posts

256 months

Thursday 27th July 2006
quotequote all
Looks like the victory doughnuts will be easy

ultimasimon

9,643 posts

265 months

Thursday 27th July 2006
quotequote all
cyberface said:
Tripe. That's so far removed from practical transport they may as well have used a Honda C90 Cub and got 150 miles per gallon. It probably would have been more comfortable.

The whole point of the 7 is enthusiastic fast driving - nobody would put up with all the disadvantages of the Caterham to save a few quid on petrol FFS.

I'm not normally a miserable boo-boy but this seems not only largely pointless, but almost an embarrassing display appearing like they're trying to suck up to the green anti-car tts.

(back off rant box, the wheels look like the collapsible space saver in the front of my 911!)


Agreed, but this sort of low speed stunt still atracts the media, the interest of the general public and gets us talking about it, so just as a PR exploit it will bring them business and raise their company profile

Edited to add quote cos slinky got in there.. hey slinks, its not a race you know

Edited by ultimasimon on Thursday 27th July 19:57

slinky

15,704 posts

256 months

Thursday 27th July 2006
quotequote all
note I only used a few words.. This is a thread about economy after all

cyberface

12,214 posts

264 months

Thursday 27th July 2006
quotequote all
slinky said:
note I only used a few words.. This is a thread about economy after all

old64er

1,388 posts

245 months

Thursday 27th July 2006
quotequote all
It sure ain't no looker

Bigglesworth

58 posts

250 months

Thursday 27th July 2006
quotequote all
Hmmm........it probably does it for someone , blowed if I know who though. If this is a trend, we'll have diesel race cars next then! - oh sorry, we already got them didn't we? - (well prototypes anyway)
New diesel TVR engine? - Any takers who don't hug trees?

code monkey

3,310 posts

264 months

Thursday 27th July 2006
quotequote all
2 fingers up at grin piss tho isnt it, next time they say sports cars are not good for fuel economy.

davy9449

1,275 posts

226 months

Friday 28th July 2006
quotequote all
ultimasimon said:
cyberface said:
Tripe. That's so far removed from practical transport they may as well have used a Honda C90 Cub and got 150 miles per gallon. It probably would have been more comfortable.

The whole point of the 7 is enthusiastic fast driving - nobody would put up with all the disadvantages of the Caterham to save a few quid on petrol FFS.

I'm not normally a miserable boo-boy but this seems not only largely pointless, but almost an embarrassing display appearing like they're trying to suck up to the green anti-car tts.

(back off rant box, the wheels look like the collapsible space saver in the front of my 911!)


Agreed, but this sort of low speed stunt still atracts the media, the interest of the general public and gets us talking about it, so just as a PR exploit it will bring them business and raise their company profile

Edited to add quote cos slinky got in there.. hey slinks, its not a race you know

Edited by ultimasimon on Thursday 27th July 19:57


Agreed, but still a relatively pointless exercise seen as nobody drives like that or you would fall asleep at the wheel trying.

AER

1,142 posts

277 months

Friday 28th July 2006
quotequote all
bloody hell! you guys are a bunch of miserable cnuts! This was obviously an exercise in engineering maximum efficiency. I'm sure there was some thought put into how to make things efficient, all of which affects the ultimate performance of any machine.

If you don't think efficiency counts, then not only are you a miserable cnut, you are an ignorant, miserable cnut!

</rant>

BTW, well done to Caterham and those involved.

peter pan

1,253 posts

231 months

Friday 28th July 2006
quotequote all
As posted elsewhere I really dont see the point of dragging around an extra ton of un-needed metal used to form big cars of any type. Colin Chapmans code was `add lightness' which is where Cateringvans and Rustfilleds come from.

shoestring7

6,141 posts

253 months

Friday 28th July 2006
quotequote all
....but I wonder how fast a R500 could go with those bodywork mods?

SS7

Stephen White

100 posts

289 months

Friday 28th July 2006
quotequote all
Hear hear, shoestring. Actually, I think the basic reshaping of the body, back to where the windshield would be, looks great - very purposeful, and quite 'Frank Costin', in a 21st century sort of way...

polus

4,343 posts

232 months

Monday 31st July 2006
quotequote all
Thats the most sorry looking car Ive ever seen....

stormbear

1 posts

219 months

Tuesday 1st August 2006
quotequote all
For more Caterham design fun...



see more