K series upgrades

K series upgrades

Author
Discussion

Johno

Original Poster:

8,520 posts

289 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
I'm not wanting to start a debate about differing engines, I am sticking with a K for the time being and I've made the decision, changing to a Duratec will mean a raft of additional costs incl. gearbox etc I don't want to pursue as I may only be able to use the track car for the next couple of years and building the dream version would be wasted money potentially.

At the moment my SV has a 1.6k + Supersport cams, so about 135bhp and it's great fun, however I'd like more power of course and also recognise this is a long a winding road many have trodden before me. So I've a few questions . . .

- 4 into 1 or 4 - 2 - 1 exhaust - would I even notice the real world difference
- Easy to make a 1.6 a 1.8? Change the bottom end and then tune from there rather than start with 1.6?
- Forget that approach and try and find a VHPD 1.8 and then start
- Change bottom end, find VHPD head and then start
- DVA Power seems to be a great source of info and potentially for the work?

I will run Emerald as I run my TVR also on Emerald so it is familiar. It is already dry sumped, so it's really the tuning I want to develop. I have no out and out power needs or desires as I want to be able to use the power I have and 135 is great, but given it's an SV although a Superlight, given my 18 stone dressed driving up Kemmel was a long slow part of my lap, whilst I appreciate not every circuit is like Spa, I would like somewhere around 180bhp, which I hope finds the balance of reliability and my ability for the next couple of years, a passenger just compounds the issue to the point of comedy.

My goal isn't to be the quickest, its that I'm stuck behind cars through corners and then watch as they come past me down the straights to be stuck behind them in the next corner, I need enough to stay ahead or get past!

I am based in France, so being able to run the car through the year looking after it myself and without too much reliance on other suppliers is the aim aswell, hence a pragmatic view on power and reliability along with ease of use of the Emerald.

Any views appreciated . . .

VHPD

295 posts

155 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
Another way would be to buy a second hand VVC engine. New cams with a vvc blanking kit would get you to that level of power without any porting I would have thought. The standard vvc pistons (Trophy) should be okay?

chris_speed

308 posts

270 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
A trawl on DVA's extensive website will tell you all, or drop him an email, he's a top guy.

Shropcat

78 posts

168 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
DVA K05 puts you where you indicate. Change the exhaust before the upgrade and book a mapping session after. Job Donebiggrin

VHPD

295 posts

155 months

Friday 23rd December 2011
quotequote all
Shropcat said:
DVA K05 puts you where you indicate. Change the exhaust before the upgrade and book a mapping session after. Job Donebiggrin
That could end up around £4k and still no bottom end work eek

CraigyB

209 posts

258 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
I have the same setup, just with the standard bodies car. Fitting the 4-2-1 made a big difference in real world terms. The difference between overtaking in 4th rather than 3rd (I have the 6 speed box).

gpbox

22 posts

159 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
Hi, I had Dave (@DVA) fit his K16 SS upgrade kit last year.....totally transformed the power delivery, also had a session at Emerald afterwards.....torque is now much more constant through the rev range....

I am running a 1.6SS, 6 speed and a 4:2:1 exhaust upgrade.....

well worth the ££, (fingers crossed) has performed brilliantly through numerous track day sessions too !.....

enjoy Graham

gpbox

22 posts

159 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
sad I know.....photos too ;-)

in progress:



job done...


Johno

Original Poster:

8,520 posts

289 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
So an email/call to Dave I think, just struggle with staying at 1600cc, i like bigger capacity ...

What numbers did you realise at Emerald?

gpbox

22 posts

159 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
Hi came in a 150bhp @7K rpm......

BertBert

19,682 posts

218 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
So is that just throttle bodies on SS cams with no headwork?
How much is that?

Bert

gpbox

22 posts

159 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
TBs + Emerald + Verniers.........other than that standard 1.6 SS....all prices are on DVAs website.....

BertBert

19,682 posts

218 months

Saturday 24th December 2011
quotequote all
so about £2k for 16bhp?

chris_speed

308 posts

270 months

Sunday 25th December 2011
quotequote all
Sod the power, what about the noise wink

gpbox

22 posts

159 months

Sunday 25th December 2011
quotequote all
yeh, bonkers money, but makes a big difference in driving....and if you turn on "fuel on over-run' in the emerald you can have your own fireworks display too ;-)

VHPD

295 posts

155 months

Sunday 25th December 2011
quotequote all
BertBert said:
so about £2k for 16bhp?
What was the bhp before though?
Caterham quote 133bhp/110ft lbs but many don't make this figure as standard.

I know of a 1.8k ss that was only making 125bhp/110ft lbs before the upgrade. It made 151bhp/135ft lbs after so was 26bhp for £2k

The increase in torque through the rev range is what makes the most difference and as gpbox says its a big improvement in the driveability

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

211 months

Sunday 25th December 2011
quotequote all
Have you got a 6 speed?

As thats worth a hundred horsepower on the giggles front

VHPD

295 posts

155 months

Sunday 25th December 2011
quotequote all
thinfourth2 said:
Have you got a 6 speed?

As thats worth a hundred horsepower on the giggles front
gpbox has according to his photo.

Does add to the fun factorthumbup

Johno

Original Poster:

8,520 posts

289 months

Sunday 25th December 2011
quotequote all
Yep, 6 speed, LSD, wide track, dry sump ...

Had a good email exchange with Dave and have early formulation of a plan, ultimately will end up with the 1.6 as a spare engine .... There's always a good debate about budget regarding power gains, but I'm being realistic and getting to a reliqble 200bhp isn't really cheap, however, Daves initial view and estimate is very attractive and hits all of my targets and specs in a good number.

So it will become a 1.8 as I'd like the torque and it will run on Emerald, I'll update further as i go through the process. There's a lot of other stuff to do as well from suspension to body work etc wink

BertBert

19,682 posts

218 months

Sunday 25th December 2011
quotequote all
I'm notsure quite how useful a comparison that is as there's plenty that do make their quoted power.

VHPD said:
What was the bhp before though?
Caterham quote 133bhp/110ft lbs but many don't make this figure as standard.

I know of a 1.8k ss that was only making 125bhp/110ft lbs before the upgrade. It made 151bhp/135ft lbs after so was 26bhp for £2k

The increase in torque through the rev range is what makes the most difference and as gpbox says its a big improvement in the driveability