Corvette rubs shoulders with the Hypercars

Corvette rubs shoulders with the Hypercars

Author
Discussion

Godzilla

Original Poster:

2,033 posts

255 months

Tuesday 17th March 2009
quotequote all

G4HKS

2,673 posts

225 months

Tuesday 17th March 2009
quotequote all
What is that HIDEOUS looking thing in front?!

vetteheadracer

8,271 posts

259 months

Tuesday 17th March 2009
quotequote all
G4HKS said:
What is that HIDEOUS looking thing in front?!
I looks remarkably like a Ferrari F50, 'cept it isn't red so it can't be.

G4HKS

2,673 posts

225 months

Tuesday 17th March 2009
quotequote all
Nige, it's bloody horrible isn't it?

Godzilla

Original Poster:

2,033 posts

255 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
What happened to the other replies to this thread, e.g. from Le Man?

Anyway, there were plenty of other cars there besides the F50.

I really liked the F50 in Grigio Silverstone (the same shade as my old F430 Spider) particularly with the red interior and colour coded wheels, but yes I would agree that it is one of the uglier Ferraris, especially from the front.

JenkinsComp

918 posts

253 months

Wednesday 18th March 2009
quotequote all
The F50 was only built so that Ferrari would not be done for cheating with the 333SP racecar that ran in IMSA in the 90s.
The rules clearly said that racecars must use a road car based engine, so Ferrari used an F1 engine in the 333SP and unsurprisingly beat other sportscar chassis using Nissan V6s. When the other teams complained Ferrari eventually (about 2 years later) built a few F50s when the FIA threatened to nullify their championship wins. Shame, the 333SP was a good car, actually built by Dallara not Ferrari. They just supplied the dodgy engines! The F50 wasn't much cop though, actually slower than the F40 that it replaced due to it's rushed gestation.
Judging from the F50s styling, I reckon they hurriedly employed the same blind people who worked on the Minotaur kit car...



Edited by JenkinsComp on Wednesday 18th March 09:50