EU proposals - enjoy your Vette while you can!

EU proposals - enjoy your Vette while you can!

Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

60 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
By 2012 the EU proposes the average across a manufacturer's range of cars should be CO2 emissions of 130 g/km. Current figures are,

Range Rover (supercharged) - 370 g/km
Corvette Z06 - 350 g/km
BMW X5 4.8 - 324 g/km
Corvette C6 - 310 g/km
Porsche Boxster - 250 g/km
Lotus Elise - 200 g/km

1.6 diesel Focus - 130 g/km
Toyota Aygo - 110 g/km

Combine this with graduated road tax plus introduction of graduated congestion charges across much of the UK and the future does not look very bright for our Vettes. Those of us old enough to remember 1973 (hem, hem) will recall the days when an E-type Jag was yesterday's news and the Jensen Interceptor became an instant dynosaur.

So enjoy it while you can! driving

c5ragtop

1,610 posts

254 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
5 USA said:
.............So enjoy it while you can! driving


Or pay up - more likely the case??

Gixer

4,463 posts

254 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
Even a the base yaris misses the new targets by 5!!!!

Be time to move I say. Can't see it happening - not in Germany anyhow-it will kill off their car industry

fletch360

128 posts

219 months

Wednesday 7th February 2007
quotequote all
Yep, I can see this country being evacuated rather quickly.

vetteheadracer

8,271 posts

259 months

Thursday 8th February 2007
quotequote all
They won't be able to apply this retrospectively.

Charging as you go also won't work. I will worry about it if it ever happens, but to be honest we all know it won't.

LuS1fer

41,594 posts

251 months

Thursday 8th February 2007
quotequote all
What is the effect of converting to LPG on CO2 emissions?

Gixer

4,463 posts

254 months

Thursday 8th February 2007
quotequote all
vetteheadracer said:
They won't be able to apply this retrospectively.

Charging as you go also won't work. I will worry about it if it ever happens, but to be honest we all know it won't.



I think charging as you go is going to happen - in the uk at least. I doubt it will use the much talked about GPS tracker system but may well involve ANPR which has very nearly been rolled outy nation wide.....even the single track country lanes have it around here now.


On the subject of road charging - if you havnt signed it yet the sign the petition!!!!!!!!!!!!!

franv8

2,212 posts

244 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
Post the link !! Post the link !!

woof

8,456 posts

283 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all

Re road charging

Classic labour spin - suggest something draconian - everyone protests against it - then they introduce a slighty less painful option - we all rejoice about defeating the government and they get the plan the actually originally wanted !

In fact Road pricing based on mileage could be a good thing (well for me)
I have 3 cars - the 930 only does a few 1000 miles a year - so more than likely i'll be paying less

sayerbloke

305 posts

222 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
woof said:
In fact Road pricing based on mileage could be a good thing (well for me)


Until you realise that the cost of all your goods and services has risen as a result. Labour have already spent billions just investigating the concept and developing new technologies that many feel will never get implemented. Let's face it, if the government are behind it, one way or another it's going to end up costing everyone more money I'm afraid.

vetteheadracer

8,271 posts

259 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
woof said:

Re road charging

Classic labour spin - suggest something draconian - everyone protests against it - then they introduce a slighty less painful option - we all rejoice about defeating the government and they get the plan the actually originally wanted !

In fact Road pricing based on mileage could be a good thing (well for me)
I have 3 cars - the 930 only does a few 1000 miles a year - so more than likely i'll be paying less


That is assuming this replaces car tax which knowing the government it won't, this will be an additional tax.

woof

8,456 posts

283 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all

yr probably right - although i have to admit that we've developed a technology that's already tested and proven to record mileage and report daily. But i do have nightmares akin to Terminator 2 - that we've invented Skynet !

Gixer

4,463 posts

254 months

Friday 9th February 2007
quotequote all
woof said:


In fact Road pricing based on mileage could be a good thing (well for me)



We already have road pricing based on mileage - its that maassive amount of duty and vat we pay on fuel and also, unlike the gov's new idea it also takes into account what type of car you drive- drive a thirsty car - use more fuel - pay more tax - simple really.

goto http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/traveltax/




Edited by Gixer on Friday 9th February 17:25

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

60 months

Saturday 10th February 2007
quotequote all
Tax disc reminders arrived from DVLA for our cars today. Strange but true, the 5.7 litre Vette is £175 but my wife's 2 litre convertible is higher at £190! The old C5 looks better very day.

Here's the table for 12 month car licence if car first registered before 1 March 2001,

Engine capacity up to 1550cc - £110
Engine capacity over 1550cc - £175

If petrol car first registered after 1 March 2001,

Up to 100 g/km - £nil
101-120 g/km - £40
121-150 g/km - £100
151-165 g/km - £125
166-185 g/km - £150
Over 185 g/km - £190
Over 210 g/km - £210 [new cars registered after 23 March 2006]

Gixer

4,463 posts

254 months

Saturday 10th February 2007
quotequote all
same with my 2l Mazda!! hehehe

c4koh

735 posts

250 months

Saturday 10th February 2007
quotequote all
I don't know why the government doesn't just go for the cheapest option: put the price on petrol.

It's not the point that there's already loads of tax anyway, but surely the cheaper option - which doesn't need computers, systems and guarantees fairness based on size of engine *and* miles travelled - is to do this.

Instead of course, the govt will go for a more elaborate solution, costing billions, greasing the palms of donating companies and chums, and still put some extra taxes onto the fuel.

Oh well. The only thing to keep me sane is the thought that I know of no country that's any different...

vetteheadracer

8,271 posts

259 months

Saturday 10th February 2007
quotequote all
I have been advocating they scrap car tax and also scrap the proposed road charging schemes.
Fuel tax is the most fair and also the most tax efficient revenue earner for the gov't.

derestrictor

18,764 posts

267 months

Saturday 10th February 2007
quotequote all
shoutCommie bastards! shoot

This has been coming for years. Basically, any reason for living in the passionate guise of a free man with all the liberties such a thing should entail (like no speed limits on the land of Norfolk) is being gradually eroded by a legion of unelected, broadly totalitarianist luddite for whom the automotive phallus is the symbolic enemy.

Literally, the day we are forced from our performance cars is the day Sharp and all his finest rifles are let loose upon this rancid shower.


furiousDOGS!furious



LuS1fer

41,594 posts

251 months

Sunday 11th February 2007
quotequote all
I don't know, these politicians must have been smoking drugs or something.....too many years of taking it up the exhaust too rolleyes

xyyman

1,076 posts

231 months

Sunday 11th February 2007
quotequote all
vetteheadracer said:
I have been advocating they scrap car tax and also scrap the proposed road charging schemes.
Fuel tax is the most fair and also the most tax efficient revenue earner for the gov't.


Spot on, eradicates road tax dodgers at a stroke as well. However I have a feeling that all the proposals relating to black boes in cars, id cards and cameras on every street corner are for the purposes of controlling the masses. The fact that they can screw a few more pennies (if only just pennies!) out of us all is a bonus. Those who cry, if you are innocent then you've nothing to worry about, should take note of the numbers of wrongfull arrests (and subsequent incarceration), the ability of the law to detain and hold individuals without charge for as long as they like (under the guise of anti-terrorism) and a multitude of other quite worrying powers.

Phil