"Safety" Camera Partnership

"Safety" Camera Partnership

Author
Discussion

cazzo

Original Poster:

14,851 posts

274 months

Thursday 28th November 2002
quotequote all
Check out this website, you can even email your comments in their on-line survey!

www.safecam.org.uk/index.asp

Don't forget to read the Q & A and remember...

"32% of all crashes are speed related"

agent006

12,058 posts

271 months

Thursday 28th November 2002
quotequote all
"Monday - Bristol, South Gloucestershire, Mendip."

So that'll be a detailed summary of mobile trap locations then will it?

CarZee

13,382 posts

274 months

Thursday 28th November 2002
quotequote all
You only need to read a bit of the copy to realise that this site is aimed at inculcating imbeciles. Christ knows there are enough of those...

TSS

1,132 posts

275 months

Thursday 28th November 2002
quotequote all
I realise this isn't a very constructive posting, but www.safecam.org.uk/index.asp

Bonce

4,339 posts

286 months

Thursday 28th November 2002
quotequote all
Partnership between who and who?

>> Edit: D'oh, should've read the site. No partnership with ABD or Pistonheads.com I notice.

>> Edited by Bonce on Thursday 28th November 22:25

deltaf

1,384 posts

264 months

Thursday 28th November 2002
quotequote all
Nice site that is......nah im kidding meself.
"Notice the high visibility markings" it proclaims on the side of the Sharan.
Er no...bit of red and a bit of high vis black!
What a waste of time these folks are.
Dont they realise that more people die each year in "trouser related" incidents?
"Now lets switch live to the trouser cam.....snake anyone?"
Total bollox!

egomeister

6,866 posts

270 months

Thursday 28th November 2002
quotequote all
Filled in the online survey to strongly disagree - so I've done my good deed for the day!

P*Ting

5,591 posts

265 months

Thursday 28th November 2002
quotequote all



I imagine that cameras are put where most people can be caught?

There are strict criteria where cameras can be placed, and that isn’t one of the criteria!
- FIXED CAMERAS are placed where there have been at least fourcrashes involving death or serious injury and/or at least eight injury crashes in the past three years where speed was a main cause.






So that explains the ones they put up on unopened roads?



Edited to add : filled in the form.

I was impressed that they used the site for honest discussion, instead of using it to brainwash you.

[dazed look] I like speed cameras. I have seen the error of my ways...[/dazed look]

>> Edited by P*Ting on Thursday 28th November 23:38

soulpatch

4,693 posts

265 months

Friday 29th November 2002
quotequote all
** EXTRACT FROM THE SITE **

"Is this not another example of "bashing" the motorist?

On the contrary this will be of benefit to all people, including motorists. Cameras have already shown they save lives - more effective, targeted use of cameras will save even more lives, many of which will be motorists. The only motorists who will suffer are those who break the law by speeding"

***

Wow. I feel that this is a real benefit to me. They are going to relieve me of my evil nasty drivers license.

Thanks Safety Cameras, I have now seen the light.

deltaf

1,384 posts

264 months

Friday 29th November 2002
quotequote all
Thatll be the flash,

SGirl

7,922 posts

268 months

Friday 29th November 2002
quotequote all

Don't forget to read the Q & A and remember...

"32% of all crashes are speed related"

I should think 100% of all crashes are speed related. Doesn't something have to be moving for a crash to happen?? I wish the anti-speed lobby would stop citing stats without proving a thing...

Sorry - pedantic mode off for the day now!!

>> Edited by SGirl on Friday 29th November 10:26

mondeoman

11,430 posts

273 months

Friday 29th November 2002
quotequote all
Well I 've done my bit

Filled in the survey in the best possible way, of course!

And send them some feedback about the fallacy of their statements and policy. Bet they don't get back to me tho!

deltaf

1,384 posts

264 months

Friday 29th November 2002
quotequote all
I filled it in ....TWICE! LMAO

gilesn

214 posts

273 months

Friday 29th November 2002
quotequote all
This really is another pile of poo.

Speed, speed, speed - that's all people can think about.

Anyway, I've given them some "feedback" and told them what they should be concentrating on.

RegMolehusband

4,016 posts

264 months

Friday 29th November 2002
quotequote all
This is just a regional site though covering just Avon and Somerset. Does anybody know of a national "safety" camera partnership site at which our feedback could be better targetted?

Teppic

7,503 posts

264 months

Sunday 1st December 2002
quotequote all
32% of all crashes are speed related.

Therefore, according to that statement, it follows that 68% of all crashes are NOT speed related...

So in very basic terms, you are more likely to be involved in a crash if you don't speed...

I love statistics

mondeoman

11,430 posts

273 months

Monday 2nd December 2002
quotequote all
Well I got a reply from them. Didn't say much, but it wasn't political spin, which was a refreshing change. I've written back with more details points and I'll let you know what they come back with. See if they can defend the indefensible.

craigalsop

1,991 posts

275 months

Monday 2nd December 2002
quotequote all
I got a reply back - it was just bland spin, stating that for the first half year casualty figures are looking good, but only after 3 years will the results be known.
(I had to paraphrase that due to legalese attached to the mail)
None of my points were acknowleged or responded to, but then I expected no different.
If enough of us respond to this, at least they will have some awareness that there isn't complete acceptance of their message.

pdv6

16,442 posts

268 months

Monday 2nd December 2002
quotequote all

Safety Camera Partnership says:559 hospital admissions annually

In a country of how many million? Big deal.

skittle

312 posts

268 months

Friday 6th December 2002
quotequote all
A further 10 surveys dutifully completed