RE: Hi Vis Cameras are Dangerous Says Cop

RE: Hi Vis Cameras are Dangerous Says Cop

Thursday 14th November 2002

Hi Vis Cameras are Dangerous Says Cop

Hide them or just scrap them?


Author
Discussion

v8thunder

Original Poster:

27,646 posts

265 months

Thursday 14th November 2002
quotequote all
Of course a Stockport traffic cop would say they were dangerous, what with balancing your speedometer at 30 and all. Just proves that speed cameras aren't in accident black spots where they claim to be. Maybe the government's thinking was just to create some more black spots to justify the cameras?

FunkyNige

9,149 posts

282 months

Thursday 14th November 2002
quotequote all
So hidden cameras that everyone slams on the brakes for at the very last minute are safer than ones we can see a few hundred metres away? Fing retards.

bugmeister

812 posts

291 months

Thursday 14th November 2002
quotequote all
You see a cameraat distance, slow down gradually and are no hazaed to others.

You see a camera at the last minute, brake suddenly and are an instant hazard.

You don't see camera, get flashed, don't find out until a week later, and had not caused a hazard to anyone - but have increased the coffers of the local constabulary.

Which will show the best results for Safety.

JMGS4

8,770 posts

277 months

Thursday 14th November 2002
quotequote all
Obviously just some fast-tracking socialist arse-licker who just wants to get promoted faster in the BiB!!!

apache

39,731 posts

291 months

Thursday 14th November 2002
quotequote all
jesus! this from a traffic cop too......it is becoming so bloody obvious that even Maureen the Moose can see what this is all about

Size Nine Elm

5,167 posts

291 months

Thursday 14th November 2002
quotequote all
"High Media Vis Cops are Dangerous" Says Sane Motorist.

plotloss

67,280 posts

277 months

Thursday 14th November 2002
quotequote all
Where is this Stockport place?

Mental note to self: Never go anywhere near Stockport - they are obviously all barmy!

Matt.

v8thunder

Original Poster:

27,646 posts

265 months

Thursday 14th November 2002
quotequote all
It's just South of Manchester but even the locals deny it's existence. Just find out where Robinson's Bitter is brewed and steer clear.

Gazbo

5 posts

273 months

Thursday 14th November 2002
quotequote all
He's obviously never seen people 'slam-on' when they spot a grey one at close range!!! What an arsehole.

Mudge

18 posts

280 months

Friday 15th November 2002
quotequote all
<>

<>

Nah, it's a fine place, apart from a collection of barking nutters in the highways department of the local council.

<>

Nectar of the gods, mate.

Cheers!

Jason F

1,183 posts

291 months

Saturday 16th November 2002
quotequote all
Of course he means they are dangerously reducing the amount of money he can spend......

Colin Gibson

50 posts

264 months

Sunday 17th November 2002
quotequote all
Take the camera away and there is no need for
any panic braking!!!!!

Teppic

7,503 posts

264 months

Tuesday 19th November 2002
quotequote all
Speaking from my own experiences on a stretch of the A14 (50mph zone)...

When the cameras (they are not hidden btw) were grey people would stick to 70-80mph and slam their brakes on at the last minute, before speeding up again until they reached the next one where they slammed their brakes on again.

Now the cameras are yellow, and I've noticed now that drivers slow down to 50mph at the start of the 50mph zone and pretty much stick to 50mph all the way until the resumption of the NSL. Going by this cops logic surely the cameras being high visibility would increae the speed/brake-slam situation, yet the opposite seems to be true...

Go figure

nonegreen

7,803 posts

277 months

Tuesday 19th November 2002
quotequote all
This is knee jerk bollox. We had a fatality in Stockport 2 weeks ago near the latest piggy banks and this jerk is now generalising. I am gonna have a word with him and the bloody lib dem jerks.