Wildfire evacuation order & drink driving
Wildfire evacuation order & drink driving
Author
Discussion

DeuceDeuce

Original Poster:

564 posts

120 months

Tuesday 21st July
quotequote all
Let’s say you’re on a villa holiday with your wife, switched off from the world, both drinking lots of rosé by the pool and a text comes through on both your phones telling you to evacuate immediately due to wildfires closing in.

I imagine any police in the immediate vicinity might turn a blind eye but what if you need to drive 1 hour + to get to safety or what if you were involved in an accident?

fttm

4,528 posts

163 months

Tuesday 21st July
quotequote all
If evacuation is that time critical I somehow can't imagine anybody chilling by the pool drinking wine , you'd be choking on the smoke . Having seen first hand how the fires operate , unless you were trying to save the property (brave/foolish) you'd be long gone . Somehow I doubt the cops would turn a blind eye to DUI in those circumstances . no siree .

Pica-Pica

16,426 posts

112 months

Tuesday 21st July
quotequote all
It is the same as when you know anything is imminent; 'a birth, someone in the household is prone to seizures, etc. You stay sober, simple as that.

Aretnap

1,955 posts

179 months

Wednesday 22nd July
quotequote all
There is a general defence known as duress of circumstances (or necessity). If you reasonably believe that committing a crime is the only way to prevent death or serious injury, to yourself or someone else, then provided your action is a reasonable response to that belief (ie you didn't create more danger than the risk you were trying to escape from) then you potentially have a defense to any charge, short of murder.

https://www.motoroffence.co.uk/the-defence-of-dure...

Has been used successfully by people who have driven while over the limit to escape from danger, or to get to hospital. Whether it applies in any particular set of circumstances though is for the court to decide.

fttm

4,528 posts

163 months

Wednesday 22nd July
quotequote all
Aretnap said:
There is a general defence known as duress of circumstances (or necessity). If you reasonably believe that committing a crime is the only way to prevent death or serious injury, to yourself or someone else, then provided your action is a reasonable response to that belief (ie you didn't create more danger than the risk you were trying to escape from) then you potentially have a defense to any charge, short of murder.

https://www.motoroffence.co.uk/the-defence-of-dure...

Has been used successfully by people who have driven while over the limit to escape from danger, or to get to hospital. Whether it applies in any particular set of circumstances though is for the court to decide.
Don't get that may evacuation orders in the UK for wildfires though . No doubt someone will find some obscure stat

Aretnap

1,955 posts

179 months

Wednesday 22nd July
quotequote all
fttm said:
Don't get that may evacuation orders in the UK for wildfires though . No doubt someone will find some obscure stat
Well that's true, it's a very hypothetical question as far as the UK goes. As far as the laws of other countries go, it would depend on the country, which of course the OP didn't specify.

48k

17,194 posts

176 months

Wednesday 22nd July
quotequote all
DeuceDeuce said:
Let s say you re on a villa holiday with your wife, switched off from the world, both drinking lots of rosé by the pool and a text comes through on both your phones telling you to evacuate immediately due to wildfires closing in.

I imagine any police in the immediate vicinity might turn a blind eye but what if you need to drive 1 hour + to get to safety or what if you were involved in an accident?
Go on your villa holiday to a country that doesn't have a drink drive limit.beer

nutsyH

620 posts

226 months

Tuesday 28th July
quotequote all
48k said:
Go on your villa holiday to a country that doesn't have a drink drive limit.beer
IE Barbados.

Pica-Pica

16,426 posts

112 months

Tuesday 28th July
quotequote all
Duress of circumstances would imply no advanced warning (of fires, or floods, or storms). Lack of advanced warning is rare in the UK.

Riley Blue

23,205 posts

254 months

Wednesday 29th July
quotequote all
Pica-Pica said:
It is the same as when you know anything is imminent; 'a birth, someone in the household is prone to seizures, etc. You stay sober, simple as that.
Which is the reason (risk of my O/H having seizures) I haven't drunk a drop of alcohol this year and keep all her meds plus other essentials in a box ready to go in any ambulance - Monday night being the most recent.

Bill

58,230 posts

283 months

Wednesday 29th July
quotequote all
Years (ok, decades ...) ago I was in Yosemite when there were wildfires and the first thing the authorities did was close all booze outlets. Apparently a lot of people's first instinct in a crisis is to get pissed.

greygoose

9,566 posts

223 months

Wednesday 29th July
quotequote all
Bill said:
Years (ok, decades ...) ago I was in Yosemite when there were wildfires and the first thing the authorities did was close all booze outlets. Apparently a lot of people's first instinct in a crisis is to get pissed.
Alcohol is pretty flammable, got to get it out of the house somehow…..